Adoption is trafficking. The willful naïveté of US adoptive parents to this fact is the fuel that keeps the machine going.
“Possibly thousands of Chilean adoptees taken from their parents without their consent during the country’s military dictatorship” nytimes.com/2021/12/17/wor…
“Gen. Augusto Pinochet, actively encouraged overseas adoptions to reduce poverty. The process was abetted by a vast network of officials— including judges, social workers, health professionals and adoption brokers—who forged documents and are widely assumed to have taken bribes.”
This happened in the 1970s and 80s, and these US adoptees are just learning the truth now. That they were in fact stolen from their mothers. And none of this would have ever even come to light without DNA testing technology.
Ernesto Londoño @londonoe, thank you for for shining a light and for centering #adopteevoices in your reporting. So many of us adoptees in the US have been fighting for so long against the ongoing secrecies and deceptions of the adoption industry. This is why.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Like every #adoptee I’m still thinking about this week’s NYT exposé and want to offer historical, intersectional context for widespread belief that adoption is benevolent.
Stolen at Birth, Chilean Adoptees Uncover their Past
First, the Chilean baby-trafficking operation, which apparently brought thousands of infants to the US for adoption by white couples in the 1970s-80s, is not exceptional. It’s an old script first drafted during the Greek civil war in 1946 when conflict, chaos, and oppression…
…created a political smokescreen that allowed adoption networks to airlift and adopt out 3,000+ Greek infants/kids to US couples. This became the blueprint for large-scale, trans-national adoption to the US during the Cold War.
I want my climate activist friends and my LGBTQ brothers and sisters to know that it’s not okay to say you’ll “just adopt” if you want kids. Adoption is a corrupt industry that preys on poor women denied reproductive justice and denies basic civil rights to adoptees.
Among these are our right to our birth certificates. If you assume sealed records are not a thing anymore, you’re wrong. Good thread about the systemic harms of the adoption industry and the enduring falsifications/secrecies that are its hallmark features:
THREAD: Can we be clear on something?
There is no “debate” within the academic, independent scientific community about the snake oil that is Blue Hydrogen which is made from fracked gas. There is science showing that it’s bad and then there are its influencers.
Here is the best peer-reviewed science we have, authored by our two of our finest climate scientists: environmental engineer Mark Jacobson at Stanford @mzjacobson and biogeochemist and ecosystem ecologist Bob Howarth at Cornell @howarth_cornell
The Howarth Jacobson paper clearly shows that Blue Hydrogen is a climate disaster when you factor in unavoidable methane emissions. In fact, we’d be better off just burning the gas directly. Blue Hydrogen attempts to put filters on cigarettes and declare hey they’re safe now!
So I spent the last two weeks waiting for results from the pathology lab after my colonoscopy on 7/29 and I’m now here to tell you why you need to follow me into that procedure room, friends.
I got the results yesterday. One of the two polyps found and removed from my body was almost certainly NOT going to turn into my assassin. But the other one was of the kind that can and do.
But it’s out now. And that means that mf-er is not going to be the cause of my death.
Here are the three great things about colon cancer. (All the other things about it are wretched and miserable.)
1) Unlike almost all other cancers, colon tumors go through predictable, progressive stages of growth and development before becoming deranged psychopaths.
Fun thought exercise: Read the subhead, swap out "natural gas" for "hydrogen" and you are essentially in a time machine to 2009.
How about we not ask Big Oil to promote climate solutions and then retail their press releases and then announce oh snap actually that makes it worse
"Industry has been promoting hydrogen as a reliable, next-generation fuel to power cars, heat homes and generate electricity. It may, in fact, be worse for the climate than previously thought"
New long-anticipated paper on the mirage of “blue hydrogen” by @howarth_cornell and @mzjacobson dropped this morning. Here’s a good plain English summary:
Key point: By “may backfire,” the Guardian means “will make climate change worse instead of better-just like fracking before it” and not “it’s stupid so it won’t happen,” which is the kind of backfire I’m working for.