The #BordersBill is hideous and should be scrapped for many reasons. One thing it has, yet again as with Brexit and EU citizens, highlighted though is just how little awareness so many people have of the UK's immigration laws as it stands. 1/
The bill doesn't suddenly allow the government to strip 6 million people of citizenship. It has been able to do, and has done, that for years. What it does is mean the government doesn't need to tell someone that they have had their citizenship stripped. 2/
That in an of itself obviously makes it harder to appeal, but the actual act of being able to strip citizenship is already there. Likewise when people spoke of Brexit and EU citizens being stripped of rights, they ignored that non-EU citizens have faced that for years already. 3/
Maybe this is a failing on those of us who work to campaign against these policies. Maybe we have failed to raise significant awareness. Maybe though people only pay attention when they think it relates to them. 4/
The Borders Bill doesn't change the fact that people have already been stripped of citizenship. It has made people more aware of it though, and maybe that is good because they can now start fighting back against it, but don't pretend it is new. 5/
This bill denies safety and security to those fleeing persecution. It allows for operations in the channel which will cost lives, and the prosecution of those who try to save them. It makes a mockery of international law and human rights. 6/
But so much in the existing legislation already does that. Be angry, but don't pretend that it is only just happening please. The UK has demonised and discriminated against migrants for decades. Stand up to it. Not just with the #BordersBill, but with existing legislation. 7/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Sohege 🧡

Daniel Sohege 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stand_for_all

14 Dec
Consultation on the Human Rights Act has been published, and, from a cursory reading, it's even worse than previously thought. Seems designed to strip rights from people the government deems "unsuitable" and remove the last legal protections some have. 1/

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Just as a point, when you seem to complain the right not to be returned to a country where you face torture, right to a fair trial, and right not to be ripped from your family are barriers to your government's policies, you kind of have to start questioning those policies. 2/
The main focus of the consultation appears to be, as the government has widely publicised, a means by which to remove foreign national offenders. This raises several crucial points. 3/
Read 11 tweets
14 Dec
"Typically British liberties", such as freedom of speech and trial jury, because no-one else has though. #r4today
Unless you are going to start saying that anyone who has served a prison sentence is no longer allowed the right to a family life I don't see how you can argue that it is consistent with human rights to deprive people of t based on where they are born. #r4today
As many have already pointed out, the UK already has the legal systems in place to remove people if it is in the public interest. It is not in the public interest to deprive people of the right to a family based on where they are born though.
Read 5 tweets
14 Dec
While Raab talks about removing human rights from certain people. This is what's happening already, before the Borders Bill passes, before right to protest is totally removed, before human rights are abandoned, UK is leaving people in distress. 1/ #r4today
theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/d…
If the UK is serious about not leaving the ECHR then for most people reforms of the Human Rights Act will actually mean very little. They will still be able to take cases to Strasbourg in the worst case scenarios. 2/
For those who are most vulnerable there isn't the reality of being to progress claims though. For those who are already being denied human rights, they risk having that removal enshrined in domestic law. 3/ #r4today
Read 6 tweets
11 Dec
There is something genuinely sick about this from the @ukhomeoffice Comms team. Using the deaths of 27 people in the channel to push disingenuous bullshit aimed at promoting a policy which has repeatedly been shown will benefit gangs and cause more deaths. 1/
This week 307 MPs voted against an amendment to the bloody bill which had one purpose, to prevent loss of life in the channel, but the @ukhomeoffice comms team keep churning out the same old wildly debunked misinformation, without any concern for people's lives. 2/
The "resettles more" line is a particular master stroke in avoiding recognising just how far fewer asylum seekers the UK actually takes than many countries, but being disingenuous is probably the most consistent thing about @ukhomeoffice Comms. 3/
Read 6 tweets
9 Dec
Just so I have this clear, the PM has implemented further restrictions in order to shift the story from one about a party which he says didn't happen, and after apologizing to for the fact that people may have been offended by a clip of people joking about the non-party. 1/
Meanwhile though the real villains are the people wanting to know if Downing Street did break restrictions last year and hold a party, at the exact same time as telling the public that they couldn't see loved ones, because they are "playing politics".
But it is all okay though, because Johnson has appointed someone who may have been at the non-party to investigate if the non-party happened, but only the one non-party, and definitely not the one which people say the PM personally attended.
Read 5 tweets
8 Dec
And the lies have it. The lies have it, by 298 to 231. Every MP who voted in favour of the third reading of the #BordersBill just knowingly voted to put more lives at risk, violate international law, undermine the global refugee regime and benefit trafficking gangs.
For what? What's the point? To placate a dwindling number of bigots and embolden the far-right. Well hats off one and all. The UK just told the rest of the world that it officially has decided the rule of law and human rights do not apply to it. "Global Britain" my arse.
There are going to be a lot of tired and frustrated advocates tonight. More than that though, there are going to be tired and fearful migrants and refugees who have just been put in more uncertainty, at more risk, by a government which seems not to care.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(