“This strange mixture of normalcy and emergency”

I wrote this 21 months ago, at the start of the #Covid pandemic. I would slightly amend it now: It’s the bizarre mixture of (en)forced normalcy and (yet again escalating) emergency that is utterly disorienting and exhausting.
Almost two years in and all the professional demands have long ago ramped back up to “normal.” But we’ve lived through a world-historic emergency, are still suffering through it - no time, though, society says: You have to function normally through the emergency!
I live in DC, where the incidence is rising rapidly and more new infections are detected than ever before. But the mayor ended the indoors mask mandate just a few weeks ago, so when I go to the grocery story, I’m breathing the same air as people who can’t be bothered to mask up.
Hospitals are quickly filling up, but we are constantly invited to sizable indoor holiday gatherings by friends for whom the pandemic is basically over, leaving us to juggle the demands of our social life and our desire to act responsibly and protect ourselves and others.
Omicron is going to spread like wildfire, changing the game completely (yet again!) - but the societal imperative even here in DC seems to be “No turning back!” above all else, and so the mayor isn’t ready to reinstate the indoors mask mandate. She’s waiting for… what?
And through it all, I feel completely exhausted. Empty. We’re clearly still living through an unprecedented pandemic, with all the added mental and emotional demands that entails in ways big and small, more or less obvious. But there was never any time to rest, reflect, recharge.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

14 Dec
I agree that whether or not Republicans “actually believe” the election was stolen is not all that important. We must understand, however, that they absolutely believe the outcome of the election was *illegitimate* in a fundamental way.

Some thoughts on an important debate: 1/
There’s a lot more than just semantics at stake in the debate over how to frame and conceptualize Republican attempts to delegitimize the 2020 election and what’s actually animating the initiatives to subvert future elections. 2/
I think @ThePlumLineGS is making some important points here: Saying Republicans “actually believe” the election was stolen could be taken to suggest they’re all good-faith actors who just have sincere doubts (and maybe have a right to have their questions heard and examined?). 3/
Read 36 tweets
12 Dec
And that is, of course, exactly what the actual argument is, about the past, present, and future of the country: Attempts to establish a functioning multiracial democracy are illegitimate; America must remain a nation dominated by white Christians - a herrenvolk democracy.
The ideology behind 2021’s “Reconstruction was bad” is the one that also animated 1957’s “Why the South Must Prevail”: The overriding concern is to uphold white Christian patriarchal dominance - because it’s the “natural order,” or “culture,” or the superior “civilization.”
In this view, attempts to interfere with that “natural,” “superior” white Christian patriarchal order are illegitimate and “Un-American” - and so Reconstruction was bad, Brown v. Board of Education was bad. Conversely, initiatives to uphold that order are always justified.
Read 9 tweets
10 Dec
The nonchalance with which too many mainstream media outlets have treated the revelations of how close the country came to a self-coup would perhaps be *somewhat* justifiable if Trump were fully ostracized from politics and society.

But the American Right is unified behind him!
At this point, Trump must be considered the clear favorite to be the Republican Party’s next presidential nominee: The base wants him, GOP elites stand with him - even supposedly “moderate” ones like Nikki Haley -, Trumpism is rapidly becoming the Republican orthodoxy.
Conservative intellectuals are either all in on Trumpism (the Claremont Institute types, for instance); or claim to be loathing Trump the Man while absolutely supporting Trump the Politician who promises to shut up the Libs (the religious conservatives like Dreher, Ahmari…).
Read 12 tweets
6 Dec
Absolutely crucial point by @ThePlumLineGS: L. Boebert and M. Taylor Greene are not fringe figures. It’s impossible to adequately understand American politics without grappling in earnest with why their radicalism is widely seen as justified on the Right.

Some thoughts:
Their actions are well in line with the Republican Party’s central political project. And conservatives see their radicalism as justified because they believe themselves to be in a noble war to defend “real” (read: white Christian patriarchal) America against an insidious “Left.”
This siege mentality characterizes all strands of the American Right: Republican officials, conservative intellectuals, rightwing militias – they are radicalizing because they are convinced to be confronted with overwhelming forces of liberalism, leftism, wokeism.
Read 14 tweets
3 Dec
An urgent reminder by @perrybaconjr: America’s slide into authoritarianism is continuing – it has actually accelerated in 2021. We are running out of time to stop it, and just hoping for the best won’t be enough.

I’ll add a few more thoughts on the political situation: 1/
Voting Trump out was never going to be enough. When Joe Biden took office, it was clear that unless the system was fundamentally democratized, we would soon reach the point where it would become impossible to stop America’s slide into authoritarianism through elections. 2/
2021 is almost over – and the system has not been democratized in the slightest. On the contrary, wherever Republicans are in charge, they are fully committed to erecting stable one-party-rule systems. 3/
Read 37 tweets
29 Nov
A distorting #polarization framework and the never-ending search for “both sides” equivalence produce seriously misleading political analysis.

Let’s dive into an especially egregious example: A PBS @NewsHour interview with sociologist James Davison Hunter. Brace yourselves. 1/
Right off the bat, JDH claims that the culture wars have turned into “class culture wars”: America split into two camps, a progressive elite vs the conservative middle and working classes. This, however, completely obscures the actual fault lines of the political conflict. 2/
This idea of “class culture wars” misrepresents the political coalitions on either side of the conflict. First of all, it ignores how enormously important a wealthy reactionary elite is in funding and defining the conservative political project. 3/
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(