How many names does he have? Why didn't an IPAC country accept him from Turkey if he felt unsafe there? Was it because he was arrested multiple times? Or it wouldn't have been as useful enough a story? What was he arrested for? Why aren't you taking more Uyghurs from Turkey then?
Is it because just like in 2011, you still don't really actually believe these "escapees"?
Do you not find it ironic that IPAC is looking for evidence of Uyghurs in camps while one of your member countries LITERALLY built and kept Uyghurs locked up in European camps?
Can't find any pictures of the camps that The Netherlands kept Uyghurs locked up in, but I did find an image of Norway's camps taken by a brave anonymous photographer.
Have these European Uyghur camp operators ever opened themselves up to foreign journalists? If not, why?
Another question for @ipacglobal. Considering Canada is also a part of your organization, do you feel language like this undermines your ability to prove that you really care about Uyghurs and don't believe China's claims of a legitimate terrorism issue?
Why isn't there a Uyghur open door policy if you really believe there's a genocide? Not like you're afraid of disobeying China like w/ the US. China also made it easy with Aishan, unlike with Snowden he was still traveling on a valid Chinese passport which he left China on too 🤔
The UK alone is set to give 3 million Hong Kongers access to move in just because HK, like the UK, now has a national security law. Isn't genocide worse? The West could easily find space for the ENTIRE population, but aren't overly interested in even the few asking to be let in🤔
The West's actions seem to be unsynchronised with and even runs contrary to their rethoric. It's almost if something else could be going on here...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For months, no journalist was willing to react to Tursunay's "concentration camp" survivor story holes. Finally, a reaction, and from someone who pushed Tursunay's story while winning the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting!
Alison asked for my reaction to the ASPI article. I gave it, while proactively recognizing she wouldn't like it, inviting her to ask any specific question she'd like. Her showing up on Xinjiang seperatist/extremist shows helps put into perspective the aggressive/dishonest reply.
What's even more remarkable & facetious about the whole thing is that while falsely stating I didn't answer her question, my very real reply & invitation to ask anything else she'd like was a response after her very real 5-month long deflection/real refusal to answer a question.
A YouTuber with 784k subs (@laowhy86), long suspected of disingenuously parroting "I hate the Chinese gov't not the people", caught fabricating douyin videos & an escape from China story, was found to have been desecrating local unmarked graves in Taiwan.
Evidence suggests Matt was always ill willed towards Chinese people. Shortly after 100s of millions of Chinese were pulled out of extreme poverty & as China began making headway against the pandemic, a frustrated Matt wished they'd be pushed back into poverty to adopt his ideals.
Here are the details of when Matt used a fabricated/altered douyin video as hard evidence (as he claimed) of China committing a genocide.
This poor little girl isn't creeped out by two foreign men filming her in her village, who contrary to what they say to her, think her ethnic clothing is stupid, she's upset because she has to tow the party line & dance every time cameras are rolling, except this time of course.
Maybe she didn't realize exactly how much of a serious, totally not creepy, hard hitting filmmaker SerpentZA was. He should consider showing people some of his work on the road more often, to put his subjects at ease.
Here they are in my city, Shenzhen. I'd be creeped out/ask what they're doing if I caught them filming my children outside their school. I'd be furious if I found out they were filmed to be used as b-roll footage of them talking about childhood sexually. WTF is wrong with them??
When US platforms become the primary way your country's people communicate & have their ideas shaped, then you see its content being curated/culled to manipulate people into supporting malicious foreign interests over their own, you begin understanding countries who block them.
VOA/RFE/RFA/etc was the CIA's direct misinfo hotlines to foreigners, delivered under the guise of free speech, designed to facilitate their lying/cheating/stealing, and it still is, but they've also had to innovate & lean on platforms with greater reach.
But it's far more dangerous when you've got platforms with near monopoly-level control over attention spans across the globe, deploying the strategic culling of info while tricking you into believing you're getting the full story. They don't even need to try as hard anymore.
Cotton was one of the earliest targeted industries when Western backed NGO's and Think Tanks were trying to put Uyghurs out of work, because they knew it was an industry locals heavily relied on. Tomatoes are as well and the narrative is based on a lot of the same shoddy tactics.
You'll notice Adrian Zenz & his disciples, like France's mini-Zenz (Antoine Bondaz) ACTUALLY say there's NOT enough evidence to support coming to any conclusions, but they refuse to clearly say this in order to mislead others while covering their asses.