Hospitalizations in % of the prior week's cases are hovering constantly around 18%.
(7/x)
Now let's do this for the height of the ascending #Delta wave, when the case growth was much higher (epiweek 25-27 ending with 18,921 new cases), in fact in the neighborhood of the compared #Omicron wave in early December.
When cases grow more quickly, it looks like hospitalizations don't keep up. But they do. Eventually.
(12/x)
The growth of hospitalizations and cases is entirely consistent with a wave that will be just as severe as the #Delta wave.
That cases may have peaked in #Gauteng doesn't change anything. Those who will be hospitalized in the next 1-2 weeks have already been infected.
(13/13)
Maybe one addendum to this threat:
Not sure how exactly that plays out mathematicall, but I think what matters for the % number calculated above is not the absolute number of new cases during that week, but the ACCELERATION in case growth.
Epiweek 48 started on November 28 with 1,851 cases (7 day average) and ended on December 4 with 8,860 cases.
I think this ACCELERATION is why the % number is just 8% and it looks like hospitalizations are falling. But they are not. They will appear in the coming week(s).
I think is has to do with the left-skewed distribution of cases in the week during the #Omicron wave.
If case growth accelerates substantially during the week, a high proportion of cases come in in second half of the week and may therefore not be hospitalized in the next week.
And that's why a comparison with the BEGINNING of the #Delta wave is problematic. Case growth accelerated rather slowly.
A better comparison for the #Omicron wave is the height of the ascension of the #Delta wave (epiweeks 25-27) when growth acceleration was similar to #Omicron.
I am quite confident that if hospitalization ratios and other severe outcomes were compared with #Omicron from that period, it would match very consistently.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh