New: UK Omicron studies suggest certain populations (e.g. fully vaccinated) may have a reduced disease severity vs Delta.
Hope though, that Omicron is “mild” enough to avoid increased Covid admissions and further rationing of non-Covid care for UK is, unfortunately, diminishing.
According to several early studies on Omicron severity: in previously exposed (vaccines +\- infection) populations, hospital attendance may be reduced by around 25% and admission by around 40%.
[The Imperial investigators advise these numbers may change as the wave progresses.]
On an individual risk level, so long as you are up to date with your vaccines it is great news. Your risk of serious disease appears significantly lower. Even for those unable to take vaccines, there may be a reduced severity.
For countries with decent healthcare capacity or reserves this will also come as good news:….perhaps less severe restrictions will be needed.
For countries with saturated healthcare systems it is disappointing news. The likely reduction in hospital admissions is unlikely anywhere near enough to avoid an increase in Covid admissions, and as such, further rationing of healthcare
..if things continue as they are
Should these findings hold over the next few weeks, there are many important questions to be asked…can this tell us how the pandemic may “end”…and if so, will it be possible to see what the ‘best’ way was and learn from it.
For the moment we must ask different questions…
1. Do we have enough space to treat the sick? 2. How do we slow the spread down until we do? 3. Are we ready for the next new variant? 4. How do we make our environments less virus-friendly?
Arguably, one of the greatest mistakes of this pandemic has been failing to plan ahead. We will almost certainly defeat Covid-19, but how much loss we suffer until we do depends on our collective actions and the decisions of those in Leadership. Choose well.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
❗️Massive…Omicron Disease Severity Study just released in pre-print.
Huge thanks to our South African Colleagues who must have worked through the night to complete this so soon.
Some thoughts on it…
[summary last two tweets]
A good study.
✅ Only reported on cases that had an outcome
✅ Controlled for age, co-morbidity, etc…
✅ Used quite solid proxy for Omicron
✅ admitted limitations -
❌low numbers,
❌no raw data on morbidity or mortality
The most important limitation the investigators highlighted, was the likely difference in vaccine/immune status. Around 50% of the target adult population had at least one vaccine by the time Omicron hit. It was less than half of this at the start of October.
There is a real concern that some decision-makers BELIEVE Covid-19 is only a ‘bit’ worse than Flu. This justifies less effort to treat or prevent Covid.
It is so important to dispel this absolutely wrong comparison.
Let’s use the UK as an example:
Flu directly causes around 4 deaths per day.
Bacterial pneumonia around 55 deaths per day.
Currently Covid-19 causes around 120 deaths per day.
Source: ONS.
Some agencies and scientists report flu and pneumonia together. This leads to the confusing estimate that “Flu and Pneumonia” causes 20k deaths per year. Covid around 40-60k.
Some interpret this as “well Covid is only twice as bad as flu”.
This is entirely wrong!!!
Funnelling all “available” NHS staff to vaccinate is a poor strategy.
Appropriate response is to: 1. Mitigate properly 2. Redeploy to frontline to treat the sick. 3. Then boost when able.
To avoid a few weeks of sharp restrictions a lot of people will suffer unnecessarily.
1. Letting #Omicron spread without capacity to treat the sick is not a sound public health strategy. Nor is it sound clinical prioritisation or appropriate critical incident triaging. It may temporarily appease those who have little idea of the consequences.
2. Our first duty is to treat the sick. It is pandemic management 101. Find them, isolate them, treat them. Do it well and the threat lessens.
No doubt vaccines lessen the threat, but mortality still depends heavily on access to treatment, as the UK and US have shown previously.
Preventing lockdown…
Our gov have had one eye on herd immunity since The start. This shaped policy and provision.
It must now change if we are to suppress Omicron - avoid lockdowns - and protect the public.
Mistakes are forgivable; failing to learn from them is not.
RT pls
Herd immunity leads to an attempt to minimise casualties NOT suppress infection.
Omicron is set to overwhelm healthcare providers. This will lead to higher mortality from Covid and Non-Covid disease.
Two things can stop it:
▪️Suppression of cases
▪️Optimising Care Capacity
1. Find the Sick!
Cough, Fever and loss of taste/smell account for less than 50% of presentations in early disease.
We must add “cold/flu-like symptoms” as reasons to test and isolate. It may be test and release is possible. But to avoid lockdown, we must catch more cases early
Deepti and others have IMO been right: the least global impact would be (and is) to eliminate SARS-CoV2.
The world has not been united enough, at least not yet, to achieve this. And our leaders have lacked the vision to even consider it.
Perhaps it raises important questions about our processes and systems, if we have the power to prevent an infectious disease with a similar mortality as Endemic Malaria from becoming established and have chosen not to.