🧵 on the physiology of regional strain. While the added value of global longitudinal strain is doubtful, compared to MAPSE, strain and strain rate was, and is still a method for visualising inequalities of *Regional* systolic shortening.
1/ B-mode provides all the necessary information where changes are large and obvious, as in this case, but regional strain/strain rate may be of added value in giving some added physiological information
2/ in other cases, where changes are small, strain and strain rate may add diagnostic value.
3/ However, regional strain and strain rate are vulnerable to all kinds of noise and other distortions, as well as method and vendor dependent. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28528162/
4/ But the physiological mechanisms are independent of vendor and method. Qualitative evaluation of curve shape or colour M-mode are thus far more robust, while containing most of the pathophysiological information. This is Strain and strain rate from the septum of pat. in 2/
5/ the curve shapes of strain rate and strain gives the same information, but strain may be more intuitive. Colour M-mode is another semi-quantitative approach, giving much of the same information, useful for evaluating timing as well as extent of pathology.
6/ Even with different technology, speckle tracking and Tissue Doppler gives roughly the same information, relating to the same physiology, as in this example from the case in tweet 1/
7/ To understand the physiology of altered regional function, it is necessary to look at shortening versus load. In a symmetric ventricle the load can be described by intracavitary pressure, P, wall thickness, h, and the radius of regional curvature, r by the law of Laplace.
8/ Looking at the experimental model of isolated papillary muscle, it explains this well. As the muscle develops tension (force), the contraction is isometric, until tension = load, where the muscle starts to shorten, in an isotonic contraction.
Of course, this model is simplified, relating to the whole heart, but is still useful in explaining the physiology.
9/ The papillary muscle model illustrates the dependence of strain and strain rate on load, in the case of unchanged contractility. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13978233/
10/ Contractility changes also affect strain and strain rate, also with constant load. Contractility change also affects relaxation rate. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14220048/
In the case of ischemia, the prolongation of relaxation is even more pronounced, as SERCA is energy dependent
In general, the wall stress is fairly equally distributed over the ventricle, curvature being greatest in the apex, but the apical wall is also thinnest. P, of course is the same for all parts of the ventricle. Thus all segments shows approximately the same shortening.
11/As long as contractility is normal in all segments, this will be the pattern. However, looking at the longitudinal tension, it is also part of the load of the neighbouring segment. If both segments (red and blue) have normal contractility, the tension balances.
12/ A segment with reduced contractility (blue), will produce less tension. Thus:
1: Shortening of the segment is reduced
2: Shortening of neighbouring segment is increased due to less load.
3: Delayed relaxation in the segment, thus shortening when the normal segment relaxes
Which looks like something you've seen before
13/ With less tension, there is less shortening, until tension is too low to shorten the segment, but instead it will stretch. But with some tension and delayed relaxation, there will still be PSS
-as also seen before.
14/ Basically, in regional dysfunction (or asynchrony), the tension of a segment is part of the load of the other segments, and the strain pattern depends on the tension-load-shortening relationship. Looking at the systole:
15/ In ischemia, global tension is reduced, giving globally reduced annular motion. But load induced regional hyperkinesia in non ischemic segments, gives reduction of annular in all walls. Annular motion cannot locate iskemia.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14534065/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32600336/
16/ - and when infarcted segments recover, the hyperkinesia of healthy segments reverses as well, although, we didn't quite understand the mechanism of the hyperkinesia at that time. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15891749/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Asbjørn Støylen

Asbjørn Støylen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @strain_rate

11 Dec
🧵While it is doubtful that GLS adds anything to MAPSE in global function, strain (and strain rate) are useful to assess differences in regional function, both in CHD and dyssynchrony. Regional myocardial work, however, doesn't seem to add information.
1/ The typical finding in CHD is delayed onset and reduced magnitude of systolic shortening, and post systolic shortening in affected segments as seen here in the apex (white curve - compare normal magenta curve). Image
2/ In segmental length-pressure loops, using a reconstructed pressure curve, the width of the loop at AVC, corresponds to the strain at AVC. But any regional difference in the loops, must be a function of the difference in strain, as all segments relate to the same pressure curve Image
Read 12 tweets
17 Nov
🧵What’s layer strain, and what does it mean? With speckle tracking, the ROI can be divided into layers, and strain measured selectively in each layer, both longitudinal strain in apical views, and circumferential strain in short axis views. But what is this actually?
Strains differ between layers, but the difference is NOT due to differences in fibre function in the different layers, it is again a function of geometry.
1/ 1/ starting with circumferential strain, which is conceptually easiest, in the HUNT study, with linear strains, we found outer Sc ca 13%, midwall Sc ca 23% and endocardial Sc 36%, so there is a clear gradient of Sc across the wall. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31673384/
Read 18 tweets
14 Nov
🧵Strain is defined in three dimensions; longitudinal, circumferential and transmural (radial). Each strain component defines deformation in one dimension. It is, however, absurd to consider the three components independently, or as reflection of shortening of specific fibres.
1/ Any three-dimensional object is defined by a three dimensional coordinate system. The simplest is the cartesian system of xyz. In the LV myocardium, being more of a a hollow ellipsoid, the longitudinal, circumferential and transmural directions are more convenient.
2/ Thus, systolic deformation of a 3D object occurs along the three axes, simultaneously. With some incompressibility (not necessarily total), deformation in one direction must relate to deformation in the two other, expansion in one usually follows shrinking in the two others.
Read 17 tweets
12 Nov
🧵GLS is higher (absolute values) in women,shown in the HUNT study by proprietary software pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19946115/, in meta analyses , lately in the Copenhagen heart study by ST (GE software) pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33624014/
and even MR pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25890093/
So, it seems pretty general
However, in the HUNT study, we found no significant sex differences in MAPSE (although a trend, p=0.1), but in a large study of 1266 subjects, the difference was small < 0.05mm - far below measurement limit). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29399886/ Why, when both are long axis function?
1/ In our study, we compared GLS derived from segmental values by our software, with MAPSE normalised for the corresponding end diastolic wall length (straight line) and non-normalised MAPSE pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29399886/
Read 12 tweets
10 Nov
🧵What is GLS?
1/ It is evident that it is some measure of the systolic LV longitudinal shortening, normalised for the diastolic LV length, after the basic Lagrangian formula S = (L-L0)/L0
But how do we chose the numerator and denominator?
2/ The simplest measure would be LV systolic shortening / LV end diastolic length. In the HUNT 3 study, strain by this method was -17.1%. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32978265/
LV shortening can be approximated by MAPSE, so GLS is similar to MAPSE normalised for LV diastolic length. Average MAPSE of sep-lat was similar to average of sep-ant-lat-inf within the measurement accuracy in the HUNT3 study. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29399886/
Read 20 tweets
21 Oct
And the final short 🧵 from pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34620522/ about the findings in the ejection phase, continuing 🧵🧵
and
dealing with ejection.
1/ During pre ejection, the vortex is seen to persist after MVC, and the septal part aligns with left ventricular outflow. This adds momentum and kinetic energy to the ejection flow.
2/ During ejection, however, the vortex seems to disappear, outflow more or less filling the whole apex, as flow in the lateral part is recruited by the rapid flow into the LVOT.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(