Thread by @sheshapatangi1

The story #Periyar nobody wants to talk about...

The Jinnah Supporter, Who Wanted A Separate Tamil Eelam Like Pakistan, Is Worshipped Across TN & By Bharath-Thodo Forces.

"Today Dr Ambedkar had started taking the sterile stand of the North Indians that this nation should not

be partitioned. I am afraid that in coming days he would also oppose the Dravidstan demand". - Kudiarasu (8 July 1947)

One Casual Glance Towards History Of Freedom Struggle In Tamil Nadu Will Show You, Brahmins With Their PEN Were In Forefront Of The Movement, Also These

Brahmins Were Highly Critical Of Conversion Too.
THE CHURCH wanted to break the bone of Brahmins & found an ally, E V Ramaswamy Naiker.
EVR grew rapidly on the altars of Church & in later life befriended Communists to further propagate his idea.

The magazine he edited, the

published articles praising the ascendancy of Adolf Hitler and warning Brahmins in Tamil Nadu that they should learn from the plight of Jews in Nazi Germany are few examples of his hegemony towards Brahmins.
Even after the fall of the Nazi regime, the approach of EVR,

particularly when he addressed his cadre, was the same.
“Parpanan (a traditional honorific Tamizh term for twice-born, changed into a derogatory term by Dravidianists) should be driven away from this land,” EVR wrote on 29 January 1954. He further said, “However much a

rationalist or atheist, if a person is a Brahmin he should not be allowed in our organizations” (20 October 1967).
Sami Chidambaranar in his hagiography of EVR titled Tamizhar Thalaivar (“The leader of the Tamizhs”), writes: “To destroy caste discrimination burn the pictures of

Nehru and Gandhi and also the Constitution of India. If all these methods fail to give us results, then we should start beating and killing the Brahmins; we should start burning their houses”.

When the first wife of EVR Nagammai wanted to go to temple, EVR could not win over

her by his arguments. So he secretly went to some of his ‘minor’ friends and showed them his first wife and told them that she was a new Dasi in the town asking them to make her consent to their desires. Consequently they started teasing and stalking her from the temple.

Traumatised by this his wife stopped attending the temple. Later she came to know that this was a trick played by her rationalist husband.
- Tamizhar Thalaivar
To Understand How He Treated SC’s & Women, Annadurai, his once disciple & founder of DMK, published a cartoon in their

magazine #Murasoli where EVR “the economist” said prices of clothes had increased because SC women had started wearing jackets.
Anbu Ponnoviam, a venerated historian who had meticulously documented the lives of SC leaders and spiritual personalities, had written that as a keen

observer of EVR from 1939, he was one of those who were shocked when he heard EVR offering Pariah women wearing jackets and Pariah men becoming literate as reasons for the rise in cloth prices and unemployment (Nasthikam, 2 March 1963).

The term ‘Periyar’ has been converted to

a brand name so much so that the term is used as a synonym for ‘eradication of casteism’. But this is the biggest lie of the century. This carefully curated lie has been so seamlessly spread among the masses of Tamil Nadu that this has entered into the psyche of the ordinary man

Of late, there is an increase in this cacophony.

In a speech made on 30 March 1951, EVR called Silappadikaram, as “nothing but a propaganda tool of Aryans”. Condemning Tamil scholars who were conducting a seminar on the epic, he said:
Can a true Dravidian or a true Tamizh

conduct a conference on Silappadikaram? I can only say that those who conduct a conference on this work are simply those who want to be certified as ‘good boys’ by the Brahmins. What is there in Silappadikaram, except the fact that it is a propaganda text of the Aryans?

From the commencement to the end it is filled to the brim with Aryan concepts and nothing else.
Shivagnanam, a brave Tamilian Scholar rebuked Periyar with this beautifully & logically worded letter…
So (according to EVR) Kannagi, an individual woman fighting against the

miscarriage of justice by a king is an Aryan concept; realizing the miscarriage of justice in his rule, the king voluntarily giving up his life is an Aryan concept; seeing the death of her beloved at once the queen spontaneously dying because of her love is an Aryan concept;

Taming the pride of the northern kings who spoke ill of Tamizh is an Aryan concept; Harmonising the politically three-fold divided Tamizh provinces through literature by Illango that is Aryan concept; though born in the lineage of sex workers, Maathavai standing firm in her

conviction and love - that is Aryan concept; Kannagi the heroine of the epic is shown as refusing to pray to the deity of love despite being suggested by her Brahmin friend - that is Aryan concept. If all these are Aryan culture set against the so-called Tamizh culture then let

us hail that Aryan culture.
This Creature Didn’t Leave The Most Sacred #Thirukkural Too,
EVR at one time (1948) praised Thirukkural, like every Dravidianist did, saying it was all rational and anti-Hindu. However, by 1950, he wrote that he also used to condemn Thirukkural as

having thoughts contrary to rationalism. And people asked him if the Tamil text too would be gone, what book they would have left. “And I answered them thus: 'I am saying remove the excreta emanating bad smell from the room. And you are asking me if we remove this excreta what

should we place in its place?’” (Viduthalai, 1 June 1950)

It is a well-known fact that EVR and his movement were pro-British and they also supported the Muslim League in its pro-Pakistan demand. In an interview to a Tamil magazine, Anantha Vikatan, in 1965, EVR expressed how he

had hoped that, given the pro-British stand of their movement, the British would hand over the authority to the Justice party. In his own words, “I went and told the British that it was not British honesty to hand over the power to them while we are the ones who have always

supported you. The British smiled and said that they now knew only Hindu-Muslim difference and not Brahmin non-Brahmin difference. Then I went and saw Jinnah and asked for his help. He said that your bed (plan) looks good but it lacks the legs to stand on. And he told that only

I had to look after my problem. The media wrote that Jinnah had tar-brushed the face of EVR.”

Finally, This Can’t Be Forgotten Nor Forgiven
“In 1971, at Salem, Periyar took out a rally in which undressed images of Lord Sri Ramachandramoorthy and Sita -with a garland of

slippers and no news outlet published it.” Except For Periyar’s Mouth Piece Viduthalai & Thuglaq, Cho Ramaswamy Had That Courage To Go Against Evil Periyar.

DK’s official newspaper Viduthalai (Freedom) had reported the two-day event during 23-24 January 1971 and the newspaper

carried the event as the lead story calling it “Big, new programme”. It calls the event as “Ravana Leela” in which a 10-foot-high Lord Rama image was burnt.
The daily reported that two lakh people witnessed the event and celebrated the burning of Lord Rama with glee.
EVR had

brainwashed Tamilians to such an extent that “People at the rally denounced Shree Rama for murdering Ravana just because he was a shudra ” Whereas Ravana was a Brahmin, Periyar converted him as a Shudra to modify his agenda. And for this Periyar, Ravana wasn’t Aryan too.

Who was responsible for the formation of the Tamil Nadu state?
Who was responsible for the Tamil language’s development and the spread of the language?
Who was responsible for the emancipation of the culture and education of the people?
Who was responsible for liberating the

downtrodden and reinstating their rights?
PERIYAR IS NEVER THE ANSWER,
but Periyar marked the beginning of the toxic Dravidian politics in TN and the South as a whole.
DOES TAMILIANS REALISE THIS?
Large portion of this thread is based from evidences shared by

Shri. Aravindan Neelakandan. Many thanks to him for his stupendous work in exposing Immoral Soriyar.

#ForgottenIncidents

#VandeMataram