Where was Allah before the creation Hadith -
Abu Razin (Rh) narrates:

قلت يا رسول الله أين كان ربنا قبل أن يخلق الخقلق قال كان من عما ما تحته هواء وما فوقه هواء ثم خلق عرشه على الماء

"I asked, Ya Rasulullah! Where was our Lord before creating the creation? He said, He was above a cloud, which was neither had
wind above nor below. Thereafter, he created the Arsh above the water.

وقال قال أحمد: قال يزيد العماء، أي ليس معه شيء

Imam Ahmad said: "Yazid (Ibn Harun said (about) 'Amaa (cloud): Meaning, there was nothing with Him."

جمع الفوائد 34/6

More below
Ibn Al Jawzi:

"Amaa" means "cloud". Furthermore, you should know that 'above' and 'below' in the Hadith in related to the cloud and not Allah. The preposition 'Fi' (i.e. in) means Fawqa (i.e. above), meaning "aboveness". Therefore, this Hadith means, Allah is/was above with His
regulation and authority above the clouds. When the human being gets used to the creation, it is natural that they ask themselves these questions. The cloud belongs to Allah's creation. If one asked the Prophet, Where was Allah before creating the cloud, he would have answered...
Allah existed and nothing existed with him, relating to that which was narrated from the Prophet:

كان الله ولا شيئ معه

Allah existed and nothing was with Him.

We are in agreement that there is no creature higher than Allah, or that Allah does not incarnate in any of it...and
that He is not forced by them. Because if Allah was incarnated in creation, then He would be from such thing."

-Daf' Shubah At Tashbih
قال الترمذي: ‌قال ‌يزيد: ‌العماء، ‌أي ‌ليس ‌معه ‌شيء

"
أخرجه الترمذي، وقال: قال أحمد (1) : ‌قال ‌يزيد (2) : «‌العماءُ: ‌أي ‌ليس ‌معه ‌شيء»

جامع الأصول 16/4
وقال الترمذي: " حدثنا أحمد بن منيع، أخبرنا يزيد بن هارون، أخبرنا حماد بن سلمة، عن يعلى بن عطاء، عن وكيع بن حدس (2) ، عن عمه أبي رزين، قال: قلت: يا رسول الله، أين كان ربنا، قبل أن يخلق خلقه؟ قال: كان في عماء، ما تحته هواء،
وما فوقه هواء، وخلق عرشه على الماء"، قال أحمد: " ‌قال ‌يزيد: ‌العماء، ‌أي ‌ليس ‌معه ‌شيء"
Besides the next comments made by Ibn Al Jawzi, this Hadith seemingly was weakened by Albani himself along a few others (according to what I've sighted), but graded Hassan by Imam Tirmidhi.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Abu Yusuf

Abu Yusuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @truthunveilled

7 Jan
Once again you've proven yourself not to be able to answer the question, we are not even talking about the word استوى here. Moreover, we are talking about the word ارتفاع for which you are not providing the meaning.

Does it mean moving from a lower place to a higher or not?!
Bringing quotes where the Dhahir Ma'naa but not Muraad us discussed won't bring you anywhere. It's a simple question, what do you mean by rising, you can't answer with the same word and say, "oh rising means rising" then you are literally doing Tafwidh because you have تجهيل of
Prime example of you again not being able to stick to the point.

*We are talking about what Irtifaa' means*
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
Just finished listening to the discussion of brother @Alminhaji and what I can deduct from the discussion is the following, especially for those who say 'He got destroyed he didn't even bring evidence in regards to Tabari'.

Follow...
At minute 45 he mentions clearly, Imam At Tabaris mere statement of ارتفع is yet kot enough to give us what he himself means by this. I have mentioned this in a thread earlier, the point at Tabari is making by this still remains vague.

He negates that which I understood in the
language and he brings forward the argument against the Mu'attil and thereby says 'why don't you say it's it's Irtifaa' of Mulk and Sultan'. So both the Majazi and the Lughawiyy meaning have been stirred by Imam Tabari.

Yet what Imam Tabari tells us, is the outward
Read 6 tweets
29 Dec 21
The reality of Allah's hearing and seeing and how they differ from what we know [Part 2]

[A 🧵]
Today we carry on about unveiling the reality of the understanding, about the the hearing and seeing of Allah according to the Maturidiyah.
We will start with Imām Al-Maghnīsāwī and his explanation of Al-Fiqh Al-Akbar:

„And he sees, not like our seeing – because we see shapes/forms and colours with organs and restrictions, Allah sees shapes/forms and colours with His seeing, that is His attribute in eternity, not
Read 10 tweets
28 Dec 21
Iman, actions and the Hanafiyyah

[A 🧵]
Imam Abū Hanīfah says in Al-Wasiyyah:

„Actions are other than the belief, and the belief js other than actions, the evidence for this is at many times an action is uplifted from a believer, and it is not allowed to say, 'Iman was uplifted from Him.'
So an example would be, Allah ﷻ has lifted the prayer from her (the woman on menstruation), but it I not allowed to say, 'Iman was lifted from her and [she] was commanded with leaving Iman.
Read 9 tweets
27 Dec 21
Is Allah affected by creation? [Part 1]

[A 🧵]

Imam Abu Ja'far at Tahawi says:

"...[He is] a provider without [any] effort"
A group claims that Allah's actions are Muhdath [Originated] yet not created. They have opened the door to Kalami arguments.

Why do they say this?

1) Because it happens when Allah wants it to happen, for example, Allah spoke to Musa a.s. in the past, not in the present.
They use the above example as proof, that Allah's actions of speaking with Musa, isn't eternal, rather it originated at that moment when of event.
Read 13 tweets
25 Dec 21
Af'āl and Muhdath [Maturidi explanation]

[A 🧵]
Recently, I was listening to a discussion about the issue of Kalamullah where one Salafi brother threw in the claim that the actions of Allah are Muhdath in support of his claim that the Qur'an is Muhdath, and something Muhdath can be applied to Allah.
Oftently, when we see the Mutakallimeen and opposite cross paths, they roll over each other due to their terminological differences.
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(