A THREAD on t profound implications of human beings being born connected.
My tweet ystrdy on #CommunicativeMusicality has had lots of engagemnt, so I thought I'd offer more. Let's go back to t late 1960s, whn radical discoveries were being made abt babies.
2. Anyone who follows my work knows that I am constantly saying "Babies are born already connected." It sounds sweet, but actually it is radical. It was only in the 1960s that infant scientists began to think this. It was a claim that generated major scientific arguments.
3. Video technology had improved by 1960s, so scientists cd examine infant behaviour in very slow motion. And suddenly it was possible to see all t nuances, the coordination, the sensory complexity that you miss in real time. What did they discover? Babies are born COMMUNICATIVE.
4. Let's look at that earlier video again. What do we see if we look closely? The baby is 10 wks old. He's not looking AT t mother. He's looking WITH t mother. The mutual gaze is a relational moment. He's discoverng what sharing attention feels like. Comfortable or uncomfortable?
5. Can we think about this radical idea for a moment? It ties in fully with what we now know about attachment & trauma & developing stress systems. A baby is born with a biology ready & eager & able to communicate. How that feels depends on what other people offer back.
6. Mum says in a soft voice "Where's my smile gone?" And the baby smiles! In response! Not because he understands her words, but in response to her warm, quiet tone. His brain perceives her attention is directed to him. He feels he MATTERS to her! Yeah!
7. When he vocalises, Mum ups the intensity. She takes it as invitation for MORE! Her smile gets bigger and she offers more words, in a faster rhythm. "Yes, Yes, I know! I knew there's gonna be another smilie!"
It's a spontaneous jazz session, with BOTH actively contributing.
8. Baby thinks somethng like: "OMG. That is so exciting! Mum is sooo much fun!!!" And then? It starts to get a bit TOO excitng, too intense. Watch his hands. They start to move, to flail. He looks away, to calm t excitemnt (to self-regulate). We're seeing his strss systm develop.
9. What does Mum do? She takes hold of his hands! Is she aware of that? Probably not. Does she do it for a particular reason? Probably not. She's just 'playing'. It seems sweet. But the baby???? He is discovering a LIFE LESSON: what emotional intimacy feels like.
10. ALL HIS SENSES. All his bodily movements. His muscles, his hearing, his vision, the hormones now pumping through his body. They are all oriented to this jazz exchange. ALL AT THE SAME TIME. His biology is coordinated toward communication. This iconic image conveys that.
11. This is a radical idea. It is a profound idea. Human beings are born with a biology that is built for relationships. Their brains NOTICE what other people are doing. Their brains think everything those people do MEANS SOMETHING. They read everything as 'intentional'.
12. So when I tweeted earlier this week about new research on how mobile phones change parents' interactns with babies...? That's relevant. If a baby's communicative bids go ignored because parents are often distracted, the baby FEELS ignored.
13. Whn I tweeted earlier quotng @DrGaborMate on how stress interferes w/ parents' ability to attune to their babies? That's relevant. All t people who replied ths is why we need to support parents? They're right! If parents are stressed, babies notice.
14. When I tweeted earlier about the work of paediatrician @childinmind ? It's relevant. She keeps saying that if health systems could make space to LISTEN to parents & help them make sense of children's behaviour, lots of problems dissipate.
15. Whn I tweeted abt @SimonPartridge work on early boardng school? He's sayng somethng radical: That t damage many of these childrn experienced goes back further than being sent away at 8. It started as babies, in a culture whr disconnection is t norm.
16. Whn I tweet abt t work of early years settings who focus on helpng t children in their care to feel LOVED, like @lullabynursery? In USA, 25% of new mothers go back to work w/in 2 weeks of birth. What if a baby doesn't feel heard, safe, KNOWN by staff?
17. Ok, I've moved a long way frm t ground-breaking, fascinating work done by scientists of 1960s & 1970s. I'm workng hard to make sure their theoretical work doesn't stay in t text books. It needs to inform our society, our culture, our professions. Parents deserve to know it.
18. When @katesilverton publshd her book 'there's no such thing as naughty', she must intentionlly hv chosen a provocative title. Lots of folk will disagree. Our culture is attached to t idea that childrn who behave 'badly' need punished. T idea they are communicatng is radical.
19. If I can help ppl to be more curious abt babies' capacities, my work is done. If I can help parents realise t power of their hugs & laughter & warmth, my work is done. We're living thru a pandemic. Lots of parents are stressed. This will change our future if we don't get it.
20/end. THANK YOU to every person who finds ways to ripple out these insights to others. I like knowing I am one member of a big choir, all of us singing loudly. (And, given the season, lets make that a jolly Christmas Carol Choir!)
Seasons Greetings, all.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Suzanne Zeedyk

Suzanne Zeedyk Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @suzannezeedyk

11 Dec 21
'Twas Two Weeks Before Christmas.
Last year on ths very day, we were broadcasting live this Seasonal Special of #TigersAndTeddies. My thanks to all who came, to @garywrobinson who is The Best & to t teacher who taught me to write outrageous drivel poetry.
2. Okay, I'm in fits of giggles remembrng this moment of the Poetic Recitation. "And then? Gary was speaking, his good jolly self. That's 'good jolly self', not 'jolly old elf'." #GoodFriends
@garywrobinson @paulinescott222 @fionalarkin13 @HeatherMunro8 @JKnussen @gerrydiamond71 Image
Read 5 tweets
4 Dec 21
THREAD. This is crucial for us to understand. This is what James Robertson wrote about in the 1970s. This is what I wrote about in 2014. This is what @childinmind wrote about last week. CHILDREN’S PAIN BECOMES TOO MUCH FOR US ADULTS TO BEAR. So we leave them alone with it.
2. Here is James Robertson in 1970 on Professional Anxiety. "The worker’s defence agnst pain may cause him unwittingly to avert from the child whose extreme distress is painful to see. Young childrn tend to be seen en masse, only fleetingly as people." robertsonfilms.info
3. Here is me in 2014: "Children’s distress is too sharp for us, as adults, to risk feeling ourselves. So we tell ourselves, consciously and unconsciously, that it’s not ‘that bad’, that a child will get over it."
suzannezeedyk.com/why-profession…
Read 18 tweets
28 Oct 21
Why is it sometimes hard for members of professional groups to see how ordinary practices can be harmful to children?
A THREAD that looks back on history for some help.
Why did I want to write it? Well, t @BPSOfficial call for a ban on isolation rooms has sparked disagreement.
2. Many of you will have heard me talk about James Robertson's work in hospitals in 1950s. He was concerned about t common, ordinary policies that separated young children frm parents. He was so concerned, he made a film to help ppl see. Here's t trailer.
3. It was ordinary, accepted practice to restrict children from seeing parents until 'visiting times', which were often only on a Saturday. Children cried intensely for their parents. Eventually they would stop. The staff saw 'settling'. Robertson saw 'emotional deterioration'.
Read 22 tweets
28 Oct 21
Good Behaviour vs Bad Kids. Here's one of Robin Grille's summaries of t empirical evidence:
"Contrary to popular myth, many studies show that whn childrn expect rewards, they perform more poorly....Rewards kill creativity. They discourage risk-taking."
naturalchild.org/articles/robin…
2. "Rewards and praise condition children to seek approval; they end up doing things to impress, instead of doing things for themselves. This can hold back the development of self-motivation and makes them dependent on outside opinion." naturalchild.org/articles/robin…
3. "Rewarding children's compliance is the flip-side of punishing their disobedience. It is seduction in the place of tyranny. Many studies show that people who use more rewards also use more punishment; they are more likely to be autocratic." naturalchild.org/articles/robin…
Read 6 tweets
22 Oct 21
I was awake too early this morn, the stories I’ve been hearing circling uncomfortably around my head. What are they stories of? How our exhaustion & fear is leading us to damage young children. A THREAD on BEING BRAVE and SAYING NO.
(2) Story 1: A mum carries background worry all day at her work abt her beloved 1-year-old, because she has never seen inside the nursery where her baby now spends her day. Never even *seen* it. I wonder: How many other mums & dads are coping with the same disorienting worry?
(3) Story 2: Children are dropped off on a busy high street, next to traffic. T risk of COVID is deemed to make it too dangerous for them to come inside. I think: Okay, so the toughest moment of every day for these children is taking place amidst sensory onslaught.
Read 23 tweets
15 Oct 21
New THREAD on authoritarianism & attitudes toward children.
I woke to enthusiasm frm many of you abt my thread yesterdy on this topic, so I thought I might expand on it. I believe that understandng these links helps give depth & sense to much of what is happening in our society.
2. Here is ystrdy's thread.
The most essential thing I say in it is: Fight fear.
The second most essential thing is: Adults hold beliefs about how children shd 'be'. Those beliefs are related to their sense of threat.
(Yes, that can feel surprisng.)
3. Stanley Feldman is a leading political science researcher. Here is his 2020 paper, drawing on data frm 1763 Americns in 2016. His key conclusn: t more authoritarian a person is (more controlling of children), t more intolerance & threat they feel. stanleyfeldman.site44.com/Feldman_Author…
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(