It’s okay if vaccinated people spread covid.
As you can tell from the anecdote, two lines forbid people with covid from going in, but the vaccinated line is indifferent to whether you have covid or not. All that matters there is your vaccination status.

If you are vaccinated, it is fine to carry in a live case of covid.
So, to get in to the event, you can either (a) not have covid or (b) have covid but be vaccinated.

Does this double standard make sense? How is it just? Or sane?
I mean, you’d have to be an idiot to think “vaccinated” = “does not have covid”, right?

No one actually believes that vaccination prevents contracting covid, do they?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eve Keneinan 𝛗☦️ن

Eve Keneinan 𝛗☦️ن Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EveKeneinan

31 Dec 21
OMNI-MAN vs ONE PUNCH MAN’S S-CLASS HEROES
Omni-Man vs Puri Puri Prisoner (S-class 17)
Winner: Omni-Man

Puri Puri Prisoner is very strong, fast, and durable, but he just isn’t in Omni-Man’s weight class. He’s likely more comparable to Monster Girl.
Omni-Man vs Tanktop Master (S-class 16)
Winner: Omni-Man, probably

Tanktop Master is also extremely strong, fast, and durable, but not in Omni-Man’s weight class. However, TTM is a highly skilled combatant. It is possible he could defeat Omni-Man using e.g. holds, but unlikely.
Read 36 tweets
31 Dec 21
Trans ideology is a legacy of Descartes — and Kant — in that it holds there is some kind of sexed “spirit” or ghost that lives inside the sexed body, and can be sexed oppositely to the body.

One claims to be a woman if one’s “ghost” is “female” — even though one’s body is male.
No one, as far as I am aware, has ever come ever close to giving a coherent account of what it MEANS to say “My living body is male, but I am not male. I am in reality a female, despite my factical embodiment.”

What could this possibly mean? One has a sexed “spirit”?
It isn’t clear, if one’s body is male, what it could even mean to say that one is “really” female. What is female? Not one’s body, by definition. What, then?

One’s soul/spirit/ghost in the machine? Is that what an “identity” refers to? Really?
Read 15 tweets
30 Dec 21
This is true. The *constant* lies about #GamerGate were a massive red pill for me. My attitude of default mild skepticism toward most media transformed into one of default distrust. I take *most* media reports with as much faith as emails telling me I’ve inherited millions …
This is KEY.

Woke / Critical Social Justice isn’t well-meaning and it isn’t honestly mistaken.

It is EVIL and needs to be understood as such. Some people might be duped by its moralistic rhetoric at first, but no one stays in it unless they *enjoy* hurting people.
This is the main commodity Woke / Critical Social Justice sells, after all: a license to hurt people without consequence and with a deep feeling of moral self-righteousness.

Pleasure in hurting the weak and defenseless is an irresistible drug to some human types.
Read 4 tweets
28 Dec 21
Woke repudiates principles. It must, because the same act has a different moral value depending on the identities of the agent and patient. This is always, necessarily, arbitrary. But arbitrary rules always foster tyranny, which depends on such arbitrary rules.
Woke — and Woke compatible doctrines, like CRT — reject Kant’s universalizability test of moral maxims. Because Woke maxims can’t pass it, no more than other racist or bigoted maxims — their ESSENCE is their exclusion of the demonized outgroup.
Universalizability is one key test of a moral maxim: can we make a particular maxim a universal principle?
Read 15 tweets
28 Dec 21
I suppose I should explain the fallacy here, since it may not be obvious if you aren’t used to seeing it.
Basically, it is an equivocation on “objective.”

The claim is that an “objective morality” is “any moral system with a non-mind-dependent standard.” And it is trivially easy to select such a standard.

The problem is that the SELECTION is subjective.
So I can claim that morality is based on "how much the nearest feather weighs.”

That would yield objective, indeed, measurable standards.

But it wouldn’t really, because the objective standard is erected arbitrarily and subjectively.
Read 19 tweets
28 Dec 21
LAPD release shocking footage of shooting that killed teen bystander
Watch it before YT bans it.
I saw some dimwit going on about how shooting was overreaction to a guy with a bike lock, but it was not. This guy was severely beating random, innocent people. Shooting was definitely warranted. A bike lock used so is a deadly weapon.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(