I would kindly suggest, if you are really concerned about safeguarding of trans kids, you don't report those concerns to a guy on the internet who was let go from Childline because he was practicing a form of what some consider to be trans conversion therapy on the phonelines. 1/
Obviously, other people, like those at Christian Concern, who ask "when will this trans madness end?", and at the famously pro-LGBT+ Daily Mail, read his actions differently. To Christians and the Right-Wing media he is a hero.
With "friends" like these etc... 2/
James is a former barrister who was re-training to become a therapist, but he was expelled from university. He is now taking a case against the university and has raised the usual 10s of thousands the gender critical movement is able to raise for personal cases like this. 3/
He has also formed Thoughtful Therapists" (even though, he is not AFAIK a qualified therapist?) which seeks to add some caveats to legislation to ban trans conversion therapy, which would allow people like him to continue to fight against the affirmation of trans kids. 4/
At best, he is a controversial figure, and at worst he is a completely unqualified internet crank trying to directly "save" trans children, elevated to prominence in a transphobic UK-based conspiracy theory cult. Either way, IMO, not an authority to report "concerns" too. 5/
If you are a trustee of any organisation who professes to help children, and you have legitimate safeguarding concerns which are dismissed in-house, there are actual authorities you can report those concerns to that aren't "some guy called James on the net with a portfolio." 6/
Clearly, James, and the wider gender critical movement, have an overall agenda against the core mission of Mermaids, a UK charity that has existed for 25 years.
Going to the GC movement with "safeguarding concerns" immediately undermines the legitimacy of those concerns. 7/
It's almost three years since the gender critical movement took a serious crack at Mermaids. Back then, they managed to get a 500k Lottery grant withheld pending an investigation by the Lottery. They were exuberant, until... 8/
...@Hbomberguy, streaming himself playing Donkey Kong, raised 340k, while also getting people like Alexandra Occasio Cortez to appear on the stream. It was a PR disaster for the GC movement, compounded when the Lottery concluded their review and gave Mermaids the 500k grant. 9/
After the Keira Bell decision against the Tavistock was rightly overturned, and an appeal is unlikely to be granted, or to be successful (and Keira has been spotted out on anti-vax protests now) it seems they are gearing up to take another serious crack at Mermaids in 2022. 10/
I really do feel for the people who work at organisations who are just trying to help transgender kids, while also having to constantly deal with social and mainstream media panic about transgender people getting support at an earlier age (which is a good thing.) 11/
It is also literally impossible for any organisation at all to profess support for trans people, or use trans inclusive language online, without being piled on by this well-funded internet mob.
I really hope that this trans panic begins to disappate in 2022. 12/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Coming in to 2022, gender criticism is riven with hypocrisy, because gender critical leaders are stuck in the impossible conundrum of wanting to appear extreme enough to appease their increasingly extreme followers, while also being moderate enough for the general public. 1/
They've spent years cultivating the idea that most trans women transition for sexual reasons, and associating trans people with pedophilia. So, now, when they say they "have nothing against trans people," some followers ask: "you have nothing against perverts and pedophiles?" 2/
There have been a few gender critical trans people supporting this movement. Debbie Hayton, Fionne Orlander, Kristina Harrison, and latterly a trans guy called Aaron Terrell. A growing amount of GC extremists are asking: "Why are we associating with pedophile apologists?" 3/
Once people get into conspiratorial modes of thinking like this, even the act of trying to explain that this is a very silly thing to think is seen as hostile, and ultimately a part of the conspiracy against them.
Still, I'm going to try. 1/
This particular conspiracy theory has been going since 2019, and started with this tweet. It was seen as @jk_rowling "coming out" as gender critical (even though most trans people already knew she was GC.)
As such, it is VERY important to the gender critical movement. 2/
How important? At the recent LGB Alliance conference, they were selling it printed on merchanise. *That* important. After a few months, some GC people noticed that when it appeared in their timeline again it looked like they hadn't liked and retweeted, when they knew they had. 3/
- Tiktok only became available worldwide in 2018.
- There has not been exponential growth since 2018.
- GIDs referrals have FALLEN.
It really is time for the @ChtyCommission to decommission the LGB Alliance disinformation machine.
Also - and I cannot stress this enough - transgender people existed before 2018, before Tiktok, before the internet, in their millions, all around the world, in every culture.
Just like the internet didn't make your kids gay; it's not making your kids trans.
The referrals for GIDs - given the expected incidence of gender dysphoria in a pop. of 10s of millions - are, if anything, incredibly low. We are talking about an infintessimal percentage here, compared to the number of kids who might have TikTok on their phones, for example.
Here's a New Year's Resolution: next time trans people tell us that they're dealing with a transphobic hate cult of people who *obviously* don't want them to exist, we don't take five fucking years to believe them, okay? 1/
You can't take back explaining to trans people that your mate Graham Linehan isn't transphobic, actually.
You can't take back publishing articles by his allies arguing for watchful waiting, and talk therapy, which is *always* about stopping trans people existing as trans. 2/
You can't take back publishing letters by Linehan's mates in your paper calling trans women "porn-addled autogynophiles," effectively accusing them of sexual perversion for just existing. You see how that is an attempt to stop them existing at all, now, right? 3/
Hi @RosieDuffield1 and @BevJacksonAuth, Kurtis Tripp (LGL USA) has said "stop lying about your sex to trick men and get laid, you disgusting rapist" about a trans woman.
The dangerous gender critical campaign to associate trans people with rape has to stop. 1/
Please use your influence in the GC movement to stop this.
Or, at least, make a statement to the fact that you regret liking and promoting other tweets by Kurtis Tripp in light of his recent grossly transphobic statements, and encourage others not to associate with him. 2/
A movement that is rooted in love for Magdalen Berns, who called trans women "blackface actors", inexorably led to people openly calling trans people perverts, pedophiles and rapists. It's hugely dangerous for the safety and welfare of trans people in the UK. It has to stop. 3/
Two videos, one near the start of 2021, the other near the end, which neatly demonstrate how the UK anti-trans movement is going internally:
"All the people I've met in this, I consider my foxhole friends...you all just inspire the hell out of me." - Graham Linehan.
Yet... 1/
Just under a year later...
"...let's just win and then go our separate ways because there's absolutely no reason we need to be friends with each other or even associated with each other beyond this fight." - Graham Linehan
The "better friends" part of your life, eh? 2/
What's tragic is that this is the bit leading up to GL's first statement. They've duped people like this into thinking losing their actual friends is a *good* thing that should make them happy, and barely a year later Graham is saying that that "friendship" is temporary. 3/