The blockchain as a globally shared database & the open source nature of smart contracts re-establishes free competition in the market and erodes concentration of power among a few platforms—the winners ultimately being end consumers & participants.
Oh, and in the broader US economy, there's evidence that monopsony is contributing to wage stagnation and declining geographic and job mobility in the real world.
Two projects can have the same “amount” of attention in terms of time spent, but command vastly different valuations due to the *quality* of users' attention.
Like @cobie's post said, attention is the scarcest resource.
That's true not only in crypto, but in the world -- our time on earth is finite, we can mass-produce goods, but no more attention can be produced.
Web2 and web3 are going to co-exist for a long time. New business models & technologies does not mean the complete supplanting of what already exists.
Instead, there are now new tools in the toolset for builders & creators, which means more choice and possibilities.
...and for users, web3 brings the opportunity to participate in the ownership & wealth creation of a new generation of products that distribute value via tokens.
To completely dismiss either web2 or web3 is a mistake.
CT runs on Twitter—it's good at its "job to be done," which is disseminating information broadly.
Millions of creators *are* monetizing through advertising and subscriptions and other web2 models.
This is the story of how the web2 internet broke the business model of media, and how web3 holds promise to tilt the scales in favor of creators. every.mirror.xyz/y_WLA-Tk3VF5uP…
Written in collaboration with @kplikethebird and @every, this essay is available as a collectible NFT on Mirror!
25 years ago, Bill Gates wrote an essay, "Content is King," that predicted a flourishing of user-generated content on the internet, but challenges in monetizing it.
Music monetization on the internet is unquestionably broken. With a payout of $0.003 per song stream, a musician needs 6 million plays annually to earn $18,000.
I'm so excited to support @soundxyz_ in their quest to let 1M artists live off their music, leveraging NFTs & web3.
This ability to decouple audience size from monetization is one of the most powerful effects of web3 for creators.
Creative industries, by definition, are those in which artists incite love from fans; to-date, there has just been no ways to capitalize on that on the internet.
Web3 applications lack some traditional sources of defensibility, but have a new powerful one: tokens.
Let’s explore “token network effects” ⬇️
There are roughly two stages in building a new network:
1 - Bootstrapping & attracting new users (the cold start)
2 - Retaining users & maintaining network effects
Tokens are helpful for both stages, but for the purposes of this thread I’ll be focusing on (2).
Defensibility in web2 comes from proprietary data network effects. Each application is a walled garden, and a bigger user base translates into more utility vs. competitors.
The social network with most data, content, users, etc. is more valuable.
In marketplaces, transaction frequency & building user habits is more important than having the highest overall GMV.
Let's consider NFTs on Solana vs Ethereum through this lens, by comparing @MagicEden_NFT vs. @opensea:
In the last 30 days:
- Magic Eden GMV is ~1/10th of Opensea ($216M vs. $1.9B)
- But 2x as many transactions are happening on Magic Eden vs. Opensea: 2.27M vs. 1M
- 1/2 as many users for Magic Eden: 107K vs. 228K
(this is 2 months after Magic Eden launched, btw!)
This means each user on Magic Eden is transacting 4x as much as Opensea users.
Magic Eden users are doing ~20 txns/month, vs. OS users are doing about 4.4 🤯