Almost six out of 10 (57 per cent) believe Boris Johnson lied to them about what Brexit would be like during the bitter referendum campaign of 2016.
More than half of those questioned (51 per cent) want a referendum on rejoining at some point, with 39 per cent saying it should come in the next five years, compared to just 32 per cent who say the issue should never be reopened.
When asked what effect Brexit had so far had on the UK’s interests generally, some 38 per cent said it had been damaging, against just 27 per cent who said it had improved matters.
Even among Leave voters, only 39 per cent said that Brexit had been good for the UK’s interests, with 34 per saying it had made no difference and 18 per cent saying it had been harmful.
Judging whether Brexit had worsened or improved a range of aspects of British life, in every case respondents answered in the negative.
A clear majority (59 per cent) said EU withdrawal had damaged relations with the UK’s European neighbours, compared to 14 per cent who said they had improved.
More than half (51 per cent) said Brexit had made it more difficult to access a range of goods and services, compared to 18 per cent who said availability had improved.
Some 45 per cent said the burden of bureaucracy on UK businesses and citizens had increased as a result of leaving the EU, while just 21 per cent believed it had reduced.
On the economy generally, 44 per cent said Brexit had been harmful and 24 per cent beneficial.
Even on Britain’s ability to control its own borders – one of the central promises of the Leave campaign – just 23 per cent said Brexit had helped, against 43 per cent who said it had made matters worse.
Some 41 per cent said the UK had become less united and 24 per cent more united as a result. And 39 per cent said Britain had less global influence, compared to 23 per cent who said it had more.
On every count, people said that the Remain campaign in the 2016 referendum gave a more accurate picture than Leave of what Brexit would be like.
57% said that they believed Mr Johnson lied more than he told the truth in the Brexit debate, against 26 % who thought the opposite.
the Remain position was judged more accurate than Leave on: the economy (Remain +7, Leave -5); the unity of the UK (Remain +14, Leave -7); disruption to everyday life (Remain +9, Leave -10); and the impact on Northern Ireland (Remain +10, Leave -19).
Despite these findings, the poll found the UK still split down the middle on Brexit, with 46% saying the decision to leave was right & 46% wrong. Some 10% of former Leave voters who now think it was the wrong decision were balanced by 13%Remain voters who now think it was right.
Anand Menon explains this by an attachment to sovereignty. I personally think voters believe the boil had to be lanced: the poison in the Conservative party which infected & divided the country made the issue of the EU relationship a permanent sore. Now at least the case -pro or
against- can be made with a lived experience of both being in & being out. It will be possible to compare 2 real situations as opposed to a real one against an imaginary utopia.
For the moment, despite the negative view of the results of Brexit, voters seem prepared to see how it pans out over the next few years. But at the very least the stark findings show that there should be only limited hostility to a closer relationship & regulatory alignment.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mafevema #CommonGround

Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mafevema

3 Jan
A real & present danger. The handmaid's tale narrative coming to life.
theguardian.com/us-news/2022/j…
Homer-Dixon says that a fascist US regime would seek to undermine Canada. I am in no doubt that, should this scenario happen, the Conservatives if still in government would ally with America & join forces to seek to destabilise the EU.
The dangers presented by the Brexiters are not only domestic. Close to & financially supported by the US extreme right, they are a threat to a weakened international order. Some leaders like Draghi or Macron - and hopefully Scholz- see this. Other are oblivious or (🇵🇱🇬🇧🇭🇺)
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec 21
These are the reasons @DJAHallam gives for asking Labour voters not to vote for Helen Morgan:
She is he says "obsessed with nazis". This is because she:
- told Patel to "tear up her Goebbels'manual" because of her approach to propaganda around refugees
- compared the PM's attempts to prorogue Parliament as acting like "what Hitler did in 1933" & a "shameless power grab"
- compared the situation of Jewish people fleeing war and persecution to the situation of the refugees doing the same today
I am rather impressed by Mrs Morgan
Note that before posting this article, he started by implying she was pro-nazis. The honest Mr Hallam.
Read 4 tweets
9 Dec 21
A deeply depressing letter sent by @DavidHallam in response to @guardian article urging Labour’s supporters to back the @LibDems in North Shropshire. It contains everything which makes people despair of British politics. 🧵
2/First the naked tribalism. Asking Labour voters to vote LD isn't asking them to vote "against their own party". A Tory loss (see @MartinKettle in the Guardian today) would deal a devastating blow to the Conservatives & would advance Labour's interests.
3/Conversely, a Conservative victory, particularly in the circumstances of this seat - Patterson's corruption, the Downing Street parties' scandal- will allow Johnson to reassert his "Teflon" authority on his MPs. How does this serve Labour's interests?
Read 12 tweets
1 Dec 21
And now in the New Stateman ( previously very opposed to a #ProgressiveAlliance). Not an editorial but...the movement is clear.
newstatesman.com/comment/2021/1…
The chorus of voices in favour of a #ProgressiveAlliance is louder every day. Yesterday Rafael Behr.
In @NewStatesman "To secure a majority of just one, Keir Starmer’s party needs to win 125 additional seats – an almost impossible task given its collapse in Scotland and the way its vote is concentrated in cities and university towns. Analysis suggests it would fall short
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec 21
Hello @SteveBakerHW @DavidDavisMP
I am told you are "libertarians". Care to comment about this unbelievable bill in a supposed democracy?
This is tantamount to a ban on peaceful protests. It is draconian & tyrannical ( to use a word you are fond of).

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
-ban protesters from attaching themselves to another person (linking arms), to an object (holding on when dragged), or to land.Punished by 51 weeks’ imprisonment.
-ban any obstruction in any way of major transport works from being carried out. Maximum sentence of 51 weeks.
So a man lying in front of a bulldozer as Johnson said he would at Heathrow. Residents in England protesting against HS2. Jail sentence
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(