Drove 8 hrs to Ohio listening to Led Zeppelin (albums, live, solo) all the way there. Then listened to Led Zeppelin (etc.) all the way back. Fantastic drive.
Then the missus caught me "listening to music in my head" (Baptists don't dance) as I'm putting away the dishes we put in the dishwasher before we left. Missus: "You're 'listening' to Led Zeppelin in your head, aren't you?" ME: "..."
Still listening to Led Zeppelin. One goes through cycles, and a going thru a LZ one is always great.
Rock has its four Gospels: Beatles, Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, & The Who. Bob Dylan would be Paul.
I've noted before that I bought The Complete Studio Recordings (and a mess of Pink Floyd) with my high school graduation.
My next door neighbors were teenagers in the 1970s and introduced me to many great groups (LZ, The Who, Yes, Jethro Tull, ELP, & Pink Floyd - Yes, I said at the time, "Which ones Pink?" It took me another year to realize the depth of their laughter.
The missus was a huge fan of David Bowie (who I only began to listen to in well into college). Her favorite album is London Town by Wings, which became a top ten favorite of mine years later. Thought: It be nice if the cherubim "guarding" Yahweh's throne are McCartney & Laine.
Anyway, I was thinking this weekend how I became aware of LZ. Not from my neighbors as I initially recalled. And not waking up the middle of the night on Xmas Eve in my grandmother's house (1993) where she's watching an advertisement for "The Complete Studio Recordings" ...
Actually, it happened in the late 1980s. After church on Sunday evening, The Song Remains the Same film came on TV. 😳
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm reading a book (2019) in which this quote from an Amos Young (Fuller Seminary) appears:
I'll find out from whence it came later. This is very close to Croasmun's view of Sin (2016) and uses the exact same language as that of emergent entities. This is also my hypothetical view of the Powers.
In just a year, I've discovered two reputable, mainstream, conservative scholars who've reached a theological "conclusion" I reached in 2015. It appears more than one person is independently reading the biblical material & arriving at the same basic conclusions. That's positive.
1 Timothy is to Ephesus. Note 2:8-11, Paul uses plurals men (v.8) & women (vv.9-10), switches to the singular (woman) in v.11, suggesting he may be refer to a specific case. Unlike English, Greek doesn’t need a definite article to be definite, so it can read “the woman.” 1/15
The Greek words for woman & man here can mean "wife" & "husband" depending on the context. The word for “exercise authority” in v. 12 is αὐθεντεῖν, which, then meant “bully," "domineer." It’s not the usual word for "authority over" (see 1 Cor 6:12; 7:4; note Luke 22:25f). 2/15
Now, “to teach” … Paul began his letter w/ concerns about people teaching strange doctrines or “heterodoxy” (1:3). He’ll use this word again in 6:3. He also mentions “doctrines of demons” in 4:1. So it’s possible Paul is referring to false teachings in 2:12. 3/15
Interesting thought. Malachi was written around the time of Ezra-Neh. The latter is anti-climactic, legalistic, covenant-thwarting, & ineffective. Based on Torah commitment, Ezra commands the Jews to divorce their pagan wives & send away kids (Ezra 10). Mal 2 says God hates this.
Ezra-Neh is a post-Exilic reaction to the errors that led to Exile, but the ancient Jews were fulfilling Torah in the wrong spirit, which was oppressing women, children, & foreigners. They were making the same mistakes of the pre-Exilic Israelites but from the opposite direction.
This supports my reading of Paul (and Jesus) that many ancient Jews had turned Torah into an idol, which necessarily (as with all idolatry) led to oppression.
The book of Job teaches that not all those who suffer are either punished or abandoned by God. Jesus taught on this subject (John 9:2; Luke 13:1-6) in his lead up to the cross. In Luke 13, when commenting upon Pilate’s evil, he warns about what could happen to the entire nation.
In Jesus’ prophetic work, he called Israel to abandon its ethnocentric violence. He saw Israel’s revolutionary approach towards Rome leading to destruction. In one way, his crucifixion was an enacted parable, representing Rome’s eventual destruction of ancient Israel.
Jesus says as much in Luke 23:28-31, quoting the Hosea 10:8 prediction of the Israel’s destruction by Assyria (v. 30; see also Rev 6:16) and basically saying, “If they do this to one who is innocent (Luke 23:4, 14, 22, 47), what will they do to the truly guilty?” (v. 31).
Have any of the figures associated with CBN or the Founders raised a cry about ESS, or any way close to the prophetic doom they herald about CRT and women preachers? 1/4
I'm not suggesting they go after Bruce Ware (they shouldn't!). For 1,700 yrs, Christianity said doctrines about God's nature are of highest importance for which councils, creeds, & excommunications are necessary. But the self-appointed defenders of orthodoxy have no interest. 2/4
My point is that these "defenders" are not behaving in ways that Christians have always said defenders of orthodoxy should react when faced with matter such as ESS. Why is that? 3/4
As expressed in Rom 13, government is a power created by God to fight, punish, & hold back evil, particularly thru violence (though not to defeat it). Government executes vengeance b/c it receives that authority from God (Rom 12:19; Heb 10:30; Deut 32:35). 1/12
Initially, God did not want Israel to have a king (1 Sam 8:7). He was to be the king over Israel while the other nations had their gods (Deut 32:8 LXX, DSS). But sin and Israel's accompanying desire to be like other nations brought this about. 2/12
In permitting a king, God warned Israel of the corruption & oppression that would follow (1 Sam 8:11-18). Noting a king would be Israel's choice (Deut 17:15; 28:36), God set rules to limit the power of the king to oppress (17:14-20). 3/12