If you’re looking for an exemplary book introduction, I suggest Kristina Wilson’s Mid-Century Modernism and the American Body: Race, Gender, and the Politics of Power in Design. Impeccably organized + states the book’s arguments & interventions so clearly. press.princeton.edu/books/hardcove…
(I’ve had nothing to do with this book. I just bought it for my own pleasure reading and happened to really appreciate the intro as a developmental editor)
The summary of chapters toward the end is a particularly wonderful model to follow, if you’re trying to figure out how to do this for your own intro chapter or your book proposal. Wilson tells us what each chapter’s argument is and the archive of evidence from which it’s built…
… without getting too far into the weeds of actual analysis or giving away the specific findings. I know that I’m interested in the chapter and that it serves the books overarching these, but I’m still eager to read the chapter and learn more
That last tweet shd say “book’s overarching thesis” oops
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ve been knitting for 20 yrs but my output has gone way up in the last 2. Partly bc of being home more, not having babies who need constant hands-on attn anymore & I’ve noticed more and more that I consciously turn to it to soothe anxiety. Anyway here’s what I made in 2021:
If you need to write a summary of a book chapter (you’ll definitely need to do this in your book proposal, you might also want to do it in your book’s introduction) here are the 6 elements I suggest including:
1. Working title of the chapter. If you’re at the proposal stage, don’t worry about the title changing later, it’s fine.
2. Topic of the chapter - a few words to answer the question “what’s this chapter about?”
3. The argument you make about the chapter’s topic, or if it’s more of a context/history chapter, what main point you want readers to understand. Don’t assume the chapter topic speaks for itself — ppl want to know *why* they should read the chapter & the arg tells them why
A really common piece of advice given to scholars when talking about their research (whether in a book proposal or other context) is to answer the "so what?" question. I kind of hate that formulation and here's why:
So many of the scholars I work with are writing abt the history & experiences of real people. Often they're people from communities that have been marginalized bc of racism, nationalism, etc. To read that scholar's book proposal and say "so what?" would be, IMO, deeply insulting
I try to force myself to find another way to get at the issue. It's not "so what?" because of course the information this scholar has uncovered and synthesized is important and matters to them and to a lot of other people too.
Waiting on peer reviews might be the most torturous part of publishing a scholarly book. Here are a few things you should know about them to prepare yourself if you’re waiting for yours to come in right now:
Your editor may or may not frame the reviews for you. Sometimes they do, sometimes they just send them. If at all possible, try to have a phone convo with your ed abt the reviews so you can get real talk on what they think of them and what they think is most impt to address
Remember that the reviewers don’t have the final say on anything. They make recommendations, not decisions. Your response—explaining how you’ll address criticisms if there are any—goes a long way in the publication decision (which, again, is not made by the reviewers)
The title “Editor” has become central to my professional identity over the past several years but I recently took it out of my bio on here bc I think I’m in a bit of an existential shift and focusing on other ways to support academic/scholarly authors, at least for right now
I think I’ll write a newsletter soon on the differences between editing, consulting, and coaching, and what you as an author might be looking for that would lead you to one of those types of helpers
I still do editing for many of my clients. But I think I want new people to understand that I can help in other ways. My old friends on here can still call me an editor ☺️