If you need to write a summary of a book chapter (you’ll definitely need to do this in your book proposal, you might also want to do it in your book’s introduction) here are the 6 elements I suggest including:
1. Working title of the chapter. If you’re at the proposal stage, don’t worry about the title changing later, it’s fine.

2. Topic of the chapter - a few words to answer the question “what’s this chapter about?”
3. The argument you make about the chapter’s topic, or if it’s more of a context/history chapter, what main point you want readers to understand. Don’t assume the chapter topic speaks for itself — ppl want to know *why* they should read the chapter & the arg tells them why
4. The objects you analyze in the chapter and the methods you use. What this looks like will vary by field. It might be the sources you drew on, the texts you read, the people you talked to, the data set you’re using as evidence, etc.
The next two things are often left out, but including them will make your book seem very well conceived and organized (i.e. editors, peer reviewers, and your ultimate readers will appreciate them a lot if you can work them in)
5. The relationship between the chapter’s main point/argument and your book’s overall thesis. If you can explain this, it’ll solidify the sense that the chapter is a *necessary* component of the book and worth the reader’s time
6. The chapter’s relation to other chapters / its place in the overall arc of the book. This can be a sentence or less. It might be some transitional words at the start of the summary explaining how we’re progressing/shifting from the previous chapter
You can do all of this (1–6) in a paragraph, maybe 2 paras if you want to expand a bit on the evidence/analysis part. For a proposal, expanding is probably a good idea, to make the book feel fleshed out, esp for those who won’t get a chance to read the whole manuscript
If it takes you more than a paragraph or two to explain what’s in a chapter and what purpose it’s serving in your book, that might suggest you have material for more than one chapter on your hands, or that you need to think a bit more about how the parts of yr book fit together
There’s more on how to write an annotated table of contents in The Book Proposal Book, of course. 🤓 See Chapter 7. Bookproposalbook.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laura Portwood-Stacer, Jeopardy Champ (she/her)

Laura Portwood-Stacer, Jeopardy Champ (she/her) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lportwoodstacer

28 Apr
A really common piece of advice given to scholars when talking about their research (whether in a book proposal or other context) is to answer the "so what?" question. I kind of hate that formulation and here's why:
So many of the scholars I work with are writing abt the history & experiences of real people. Often they're people from communities that have been marginalized bc of racism, nationalism, etc. To read that scholar's book proposal and say "so what?" would be, IMO, deeply insulting
I try to force myself to find another way to get at the issue. It's not "so what?" because of course the information this scholar has uncovered and synthesized is important and matters to them and to a lot of other people too.
Read 5 tweets
19 Apr
Waiting on peer reviews might be the most torturous part of publishing a scholarly book. Here are a few things you should know about them to prepare yourself if you’re waiting for yours to come in right now:
Your editor may or may not frame the reviews for you. Sometimes they do, sometimes they just send them. If at all possible, try to have a phone convo with your ed abt the reviews so you can get real talk on what they think of them and what they think is most impt to address
Remember that the reviewers don’t have the final say on anything. They make recommendations, not decisions. Your response—explaining how you’ll address criticisms if there are any—goes a long way in the publication decision (which, again, is not made by the reviewers)
Read 12 tweets
18 Apr
The title “Editor” has become central to my professional identity over the past several years but I recently took it out of my bio on here bc I think I’m in a bit of an existential shift and focusing on other ways to support academic/scholarly authors, at least for right now
I think I’ll write a newsletter soon on the differences between editing, consulting, and coaching, and what you as an author might be looking for that would lead you to one of those types of helpers
I still do editing for many of my clients. But I think I want new people to understand that I can help in other ways. My old friends on here can still call me an editor ☺️
Read 4 tweets
17 Apr
I know people (rightly) have other things on their mind at the moment, but if you’d like to hold space for writing your scholarly book proposal this summer, my Book Proposal Accelerator will run from June 4 to July 22. Enrollment opens May 1 at courses.manuscriptworks.com
My newsletter this week answers some questions about it, but I’ll thread them here too newsletter.manuscriptworks.com/p/answers-to-y…
Will the Accelerator be offered again after this June–July session? Question: Will the Accelera...
Read 10 tweets
26 Feb
How to choose a publisher when you think your book could fit at multiple places?

One thing to think abt is the audiences you’re most keen to reach. Which press has the best reputation among the people you *most* want to read your book?
The people you care most about reaching might be people in your home field or subfield. For ex, if you’re going up for tenure & need to “make an impact” in the field of your home dept, you might decide to pick the press that looks best to yr senior colleagues. But—
Maybe you’ve written an interdisciplinary book and you’re already pretty well connected & visible in one of the fields yr intervening in. In that case maybe go for a press that has the visibility & marketing channels in the field you’re less known in but want to be respected in
Read 6 tweets
22 Feb
It's totally normal for academic book writers to struggle w/ organizing their material into chapters that make sense and propel readers thru the book. It's tricky when yr trying to revise a diss & maybe equally tricky when yr on a 2nd book w/o a pre-existing structure in place
What isn't super compelling, structurally, is dividing the book up into 4-5 case studies & just showing how yr main argument or concept plays out in each case. Why wd a reader spend sustained time w/ yr bk if they can get the gist from just 1 chapter? Here's how to do it better:
The 4-5 case studies or research sites/objects isn't the problem. It's that each successive one should show the reader something new, something that enhances or complicates the concept or thesis introduced in the first chapter
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(