@SuitableAlias Here’s the better analogy.
A company has brought a product to market called vax-bestos. They claim it insulates and prevents fires. Benefits that will clearly save lives in the short term. The FDA approved this product based on short term studies.
A company has brought a product to market called vax-bestos. They claim it insulates and prevents fires. Benefits that will clearly save lives in the short term. The FDA approved this product based on short term studies.
@SuitableAlias As a result, this product has been put in buildings everywhere. One expert has concerns that there is potential that vax-bestos could cause cancer but since there are no long term studies it is impossible to know if this line voice is correct.
@SuitableAlias Instead of allowing this lone voice, an unquestioned expert in carcinology, the central authorities (Twitter) decide it is too dangerous in the short term to let people die of fires or cold and, since this sole voice may create skepticism leading to death, they ban him.
@SuitableAlias Another guy who self describes as an expert in nothing (Scott) who chose to fill his buildings with vax-bestos, thinks the central authorities decision based on short ter data is conclusive so he champions their determination, mocks those who disagree and applauds the banning.
@SuitableAlias You will never guess who the vax-bestos champion, Scott, blames once he gets cancer later in life…
Don’t be a Scott
Don’t be a Scott
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
