So I watched #encanto either the day it came out or the day after, but it was one of those situations where it was so chaotic in the house that I felt like I really wasn’t taking it in. So I watched it again in calmer circumstances. I think ultimately it’s a good but not…
… Great movie.
like remember in frozen where despite the existence of a nominal bad guy, the real conflict was just working out the differences between these two sisters and their love winning out? That was new and different…
#encanto is pretty much nothing but that. It really amounts to a family group therapy session. And because it’s not new, and because there’s pretty much nothing else happening, it’s not very good as a plot. A few other complaints include…
… that the protagonist, Mirabel, is a little too… I struggled to find a good word for it but “jaunty” is pretty close. Now this is mitigated by the movie suggesting she’s this way to make up for her lack of, more or less, super powers. The other problem…
… it is a matter of very personal taste. To me I don’t like the kinds of musicals, typically, that is just wall-to-wall singing. I want to see a certain amount of just plain normal talking and doing things between the songs. This isn’t very scientific but it’s got to…
… have a ratio that I like. The only reason why I don’t knock Hamilton more for that is because I know the history so well that I don’t need the normal talking parts to fill in the blanks. But when I watched it with my wife who isn’t as much of a history geek, I had to pause…
… constantly to explain to her what the hell is going on. so I suspect Hamilton doesn’t work very well as educational material.
#encanto doesn’t have wall-to-wall singing but it’s too close to that for my tastes. That all being said, I’ll give Disney praise for…
…this: it’s still not a carbon copy of anything. That’s something disney and Pixar animation doesn’t get enough credit for. I mean they are making the movies that 20 or 30 years from now we might see a “live action remake” of…
…while I think this movie leaned too hard into the family therapy angle that was part of frozen, I still don’t feel like they are copies of each other. And of course the animation and even the songs themselves are excellent. So worth a watch but not my favorite of recent years
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So it’s the night before #insurrectionmas and the democrats and the media will ritualistically tear their clothes trying to get Americans to care as much about it as they do.
They’ll never understand why we won’t.
Thread 1/
2/ Part of this is *they* were scared. I don’t deny it. I have long said that the most basic mistake many humans make is assuming everyone thinks like them, even when their experiences are not the same.
3/ so in a very human way, congressional Democrats and DC media think to themselves: “it was scary to me, therefore regular Americans must’ve been just as scared for us.”
But it wasn’t really the same for average Americans.
So I’ve been playing doom 64 on my PlayStation and I have to say I’ve been really enjoying it. I haven’t finished it yet but a few quick thoughts:
1. It is basically a game close in style to the original doom and doom 2. If you can’t handle graphics that are that primitive…
… this isn’t for you.
2. It is not a port of any doom game I know of. I have never seen these levels before, and there’s even a weapon I’ve never seen before. Hilariously when I picked it up the game said something like “what the &$@?! is that?” I laughed
3. The graphics are both better and worse at the same time.
3.a. The bad: your weapons never have animations for reloading. This is most noticeable with a super shotgun, bc you shoot, then hear a reload cycle, and until it’s done you can’t shoot again… But the gun doesn’t…
2/ Let’s go over the evidence. First there is pretty strong evidence that the parents bought the gun in essence for #EthanCrumbley, the shooter. But before you think they are guilty of some kind of gun charge let me remind you of what the Rittenhouse case should’ve taught you:
3/ it’s more complicated than that. Michigan law does not completely prohibit minors from having guns. They prohibit them from having guns *in public*— and there are numerous exceptions to that ban in public. So even if they were explicitly letting him posses the gun…
So she is suggesting that this was a straw purchase. I think that does elevate that above simply “you didn’t lock your gun up well enough.” Cc @PolitiBunny
Of course the problem is it isn’t a crime in Michigan for a minor to possess a gun—only to posses it in public and with other exceptions. Which I suppose that’s why they’re not charging them with some kind of straw purchase statute cc @PolitiBunny
Yeah, listening to the entire thing this seems really thin and it just smells like a prosecutor just trying to look like they’re doing *something.*!For instance there’s no evidence that some of the warning signs even was communicated to the parents. 1/
so I took some time to listen to the big oral arguments today, and you can too, below ⬇️
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organi...
A short thread 1/
2/ I am not quite as certain that Roe is finally gonna go away, but certainly I didn’t hear anything from any of the conservatives suggesting they wanted to uphold it. I heard a few try to ask if there was any way, if they were hearing this question for the first time today…
3/ … That viability or any other standard would make sense. And that’s where I think it got kind of comedic. Literally no one in the entire room understood why the Casey court focused on viability, and I suspect that lack of understanding might doom the right to abortion.
To the people upset today about the #RittenhouseVerdict let me suggest that you consider a possibility: are you sure you are right?
You base your perception of the case on certain facts. But are you certain those “facts” are actually true?
Thread
Lawyers learn to ask themselves constantly “how do I know this? And is my source of information correct?” Try that exercise for every fact you believe to be true.
For instance, you often hear that #KyleRittenhouse brought a gun across state lines.
Except there isn’t a scintilla of evidence that he did so. A Wisconsin resident stated that he gave him the gun after he arrived in Kenosha.
Sometimes a fact can also be true and distorted. You hear a constant drumbeat of “he crossed state lines.”