So it’s the night before #insurrectionmas and the democrats and the media will ritualistically tear their clothes trying to get Americans to care as much about it as they do.
They’ll never understand why we won’t.
Thread 1/
2/ Part of this is *they* were scared. I don’t deny it. I have long said that the most basic mistake many humans make is assuming everyone thinks like them, even when their experiences are not the same.
3/ so in a very human way, congressional Democrats and DC media think to themselves: “it was scary to me, therefore regular Americans must’ve been just as scared for us.”
But it wasn’t really the same for average Americans.
4/ so that’s the first factor that blunts the reaction of most ordinary Americans.
A second reason is they will blame these riots on complaints about an allegedly stolen election. And then they will remember the Democrats claiming that Bush stole the election in 2000.
5/ Ordinary Americans will remember that @jaketapper, who is very mad at people for questioning the integrity of elections, wrote a whole book about the controversy in 2000 and arguing the election was stolen from Al Gore.
6/ they will flip over to MSNBC and see them complaining about R’s making false charges that the voting machines were not taking a true tally of the votes & we will remember how their former host, @KeithOlbermann, used to claim that Bush stole the 2004 election the same way
7/ They will remember years and years of Democrats claiming that the Russians stole the election from Hillary Clinton and how after years of investigation they came up with nothing. Democrats and the media will pretend that it is dangerous to undermine elections…
8/ …but we will remember all the times they did the same thing. Not to mention other “big lies” that plainly have inspired riots—one false accusation of police racism after another. They will do their best to brutally suppress anyone who questions an election from the right…
9/ …while continuing to tell their own big lies with impunity. And that’s another reason why ordinary Americans won’t care as much as they want them to.
And some of us remember how other riots happened, & Democrats’ reaction ranged from indifferent to encouraging the violence.
10/ those people were scared, too, and Democrats didn’t care very much about that. And it’s hard to care for people who don’t visibly care about you. Their lives mattered and their property, but not so much to democrats.
11/ and then some of us remember that this wasn’t the only time rioters attacked a federal government building. In May of 2020, rioters attacked the White House. President Trump reportedly had to hide in an emergency shelter in the basement.
12/ As you watch these people ritualistically tear their clothes tomorrow, ask yourself if any of these people expressed any sympathy for the fear Donald Trump might’ve felt.
They didn’t.
in fact, they mocked him for hiding.
13/ again, it’s hard to feel sympathy for people who are so callous to the suffering of others.
“Oh, but that’s different!” they might say, “this was an attack as they were carrying out an official function of government: the determination of who might be the next president.”
14/ now look, violence against elected officials is worse than when it is committed against regular people. Consider Lincoln’s assassination: millions of people voted for him and every single one of those votes were canceled out by an actor with a pistol
(not Alec Baldwin).
15/ jokes aside, that’s an offense against self-government.
But this proposed distinction isn’t really going to help their argument that #January6th was significantly worse.
first, the White House is the site of many important federal decisions.
16/ for instance, what if in the middle of that chaos, as Donald Trump hid from these rioters, China decided it was the perfect time to invade Taiwan? The American people deserve president able to do his job, and the rioters might have been depriving us of that.
17/ Second, it would be hard to argue that ratifying the results of the election was just as important as the formal handover of power. And yet you didn’t see Democrats just as angry about the riots that happened during Trump’s inauguration.
So tomorrow, the media and democrats might drive past Black Lives Matter Plaza, a landmark in DC dedicated to the movement that inspired riots for over a year washington.org/visit-dc/black…
19/ They will try to convince us that this riot was somehow worse than all the others that they didn’t care very much about. They will want you to care a whole lot about the riot that scared them. But most Americans won’t, bc they recognize how selective their concern really is
20/ that’s the final reason why average Americans won’t care nearly as much.
Not to mention that at Capitol Hill they will turn this in essence into a holiday for them while average Americans will be busy at work
21/ all of this is talking about how ordinary Americans are likely to react but the irony is the Democrats could have used this as a moment to connect with Americans. They could have pretended to see all rioting suddenly with new eyes.
22/ they could have gone to their constituents and said “I’m sorry for not caring so much about the riots in your communities. It wasn’t until I was scared for my safety that it became real to me. I’m sorry and let us now dedicate ourselves to stopping all political violence.”
23/ I’m not sure if it would’ve made Americans care more about the #insurrection, but it might’ve helped them with their real goal: getting more Democrats elected. And, by accident, they might’ve helped this country get to a better place.
24/ as it is they will tear their shirts tomorrow, metaphorically, but they’ll never get most Americans to care about it like they want them to. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So I’ve been playing doom 64 on my PlayStation and I have to say I’ve been really enjoying it. I haven’t finished it yet but a few quick thoughts:
1. It is basically a game close in style to the original doom and doom 2. If you can’t handle graphics that are that primitive…
… this isn’t for you.
2. It is not a port of any doom game I know of. I have never seen these levels before, and there’s even a weapon I’ve never seen before. Hilariously when I picked it up the game said something like “what the &$@?! is that?” I laughed
3. The graphics are both better and worse at the same time.
3.a. The bad: your weapons never have animations for reloading. This is most noticeable with a super shotgun, bc you shoot, then hear a reload cycle, and until it’s done you can’t shoot again… But the gun doesn’t…
So I watched #encanto either the day it came out or the day after, but it was one of those situations where it was so chaotic in the house that I felt like I really wasn’t taking it in. So I watched it again in calmer circumstances. I think ultimately it’s a good but not…
… Great movie.
like remember in frozen where despite the existence of a nominal bad guy, the real conflict was just working out the differences between these two sisters and their love winning out? That was new and different…
#encanto is pretty much nothing but that. It really amounts to a family group therapy session. And because it’s not new, and because there’s pretty much nothing else happening, it’s not very good as a plot. A few other complaints include…
2/ Let’s go over the evidence. First there is pretty strong evidence that the parents bought the gun in essence for #EthanCrumbley, the shooter. But before you think they are guilty of some kind of gun charge let me remind you of what the Rittenhouse case should’ve taught you:
3/ it’s more complicated than that. Michigan law does not completely prohibit minors from having guns. They prohibit them from having guns *in public*— and there are numerous exceptions to that ban in public. So even if they were explicitly letting him posses the gun…
So she is suggesting that this was a straw purchase. I think that does elevate that above simply “you didn’t lock your gun up well enough.” Cc @PolitiBunny
Of course the problem is it isn’t a crime in Michigan for a minor to possess a gun—only to posses it in public and with other exceptions. Which I suppose that’s why they’re not charging them with some kind of straw purchase statute cc @PolitiBunny
Yeah, listening to the entire thing this seems really thin and it just smells like a prosecutor just trying to look like they’re doing *something.*!For instance there’s no evidence that some of the warning signs even was communicated to the parents. 1/
so I took some time to listen to the big oral arguments today, and you can too, below ⬇️
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organi...
A short thread 1/
2/ I am not quite as certain that Roe is finally gonna go away, but certainly I didn’t hear anything from any of the conservatives suggesting they wanted to uphold it. I heard a few try to ask if there was any way, if they were hearing this question for the first time today…
3/ … That viability or any other standard would make sense. And that’s where I think it got kind of comedic. Literally no one in the entire room understood why the Casey court focused on viability, and I suspect that lack of understanding might doom the right to abortion.
To the people upset today about the #RittenhouseVerdict let me suggest that you consider a possibility: are you sure you are right?
You base your perception of the case on certain facts. But are you certain those “facts” are actually true?
Thread
Lawyers learn to ask themselves constantly “how do I know this? And is my source of information correct?” Try that exercise for every fact you believe to be true.
For instance, you often hear that #KyleRittenhouse brought a gun across state lines.
Except there isn’t a scintilla of evidence that he did so. A Wisconsin resident stated that he gave him the gun after he arrived in Kenosha.
Sometimes a fact can also be true and distorted. You hear a constant drumbeat of “he crossed state lines.”