Locked down again. Why? The virus is now significantly less harmful than before. And before, our bodies had zero defence. Now, 77% of us are vaccinated. So why are we here again? Is it because of anti-vaxxers? +
It's true that a minority of selfish zealots kept us from herd immunity. But that's the case in almost every country in the world.
No, we're in lockdown again because of bad government. +
Community spread could not be contained because we failed to focus testing, boosters and financial support on high-density housing and high-density workplaces. +
If our schools are unsafe, it's because government ignored demands to fix ventilation, decrease class sizes, prioritize teachers for vaccines and provide adequate PPE. +
And most crucially, hospitals are on the verge of collapse because they were permanently at near-full capacity even before COVID. +
Omicron is not the crisis. The frailty of our key institutions and bad governance at every level are the crisis.
We were in crisis before this all began, we just didn't know it yet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Daniel Shlafman of the well-known Montreal Shlafman family (Fairmount Bagels) died last month by his own hand after allegedly murdering a sex-worker. Six days later the same newspaper that reported the crime ran a glowing obituary for him... + montrealgazette.remembering.ca/obituary/danie…
How did this happen? Did the Gazette choose to honour and respect the Shlafman family at the expense of the well-being of the murdered woman's survivors? Would they have disrespected the victim like this if she had been Shalfman's wife, and not a sex worker? +
The answers I found to those questions suggest that this was no conscious editorial decision from the Gazette, but a vulnerability in the way many (most?) newspapers are run...
Last weekend, the biggest newspaper in Canada dedicated a 2-page spread in their A section to a takedown attempt on Desmond Cole.
Things got fucked-up even before it ran. Somebody leaked it to Jon Kay, who gleefully teased that The Star had explosive shit on Cole. (thread)
Sure enough, when the piece dropped it *looked* like heavy stuff. Heavy author: Royson James, The Star's most senior black voice. Heavy length, heavy art, heavy accusations. Such as... +
•Desmond "shattered" the Black community, which doesn't "like" him.
•Desmond has "blood on his hands" from launching "personal attacks."
•Desmond is a "vindictive, envious" "Judas," who "claims to love Black people" but who assaults his "own flesh and blood..." +
Maybe the most fascinating thing about the WE saga (to me anyhow!) is the path the Kielburgers took over the years from doing labor-left activism w unions, to delivering re-branding campaigns & PR services to multinational corporations w bad reputations. canadaland.com/podcast/chapte…
When Craig started at age 12, Canadian labor unions embraced & funded his cause. After all, jobs shipped overseas to child workers/slaves meant fewer manufacturing jobs here in Canada... Craig kinda began as an anti-globalization crusader!
WE 1.0 (Free The Children) was about boycotts & factory raids. Their cause was de facto political.
But over time and with Marc's influence, Craig absorbed the ethos of "social entrepreneurship" and began dropping the jargon of Silicon Valley tech moguls.
Rewinding to the start of it, think about how @AhmarSKhan worked for a public institution that glorified & normalized a bigot who routinely incited contempt for people who look like @AhmarSKhan. Don Cherry was at the top of the heap, a star, Khan at the very bottom...
Yet Khan spoke the truth about Cherry, succinctly and accurately. Saying true things in public is what journalists are supposed to do. The accuracy of his statement was affirmed by the CBC itself when, at long last, they shitcanned Don Cherry's racist ass.
WE buildings in Kenya dedicated to visiting donors were then rededicated after those donors left. A plaque would be installed for a visit then removed & replaced with a new plaque for the next. Multiple parties were led to believe they had "built" the same charity project. 2/x
The actual physical work done in Kenya by voluntourists would be destroyed so the next batch of tourists vould re-do it. We heard of other instances of this. 3/x