And there we have it: Russia apparently resolves to undertake a formal intervention to prop up an incumbent government in the FSU. If this goes ahead, it will be a first.
Yes, Russia intervened to prop up Lukashenka, but not formally — and not this overtly. Russia also intervened in Georgia, Moldova, Karabakh and Tajikistan in the early 1990s, but under very diffident circumstances.
If this does run through the CSTO, it will be interesting to see how many of Russia’s CSTO allies contribute troops — Armenia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.
When the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968, it leaned heavily on Warsaw Pact troops. The CSTO doesn’t have that capacity.
It’s also worth wondering how big this intervention will really be. Moscow may be calculating that a small but visible show of force will shift the emotional tide. If that fails, though, Moscow will need to escalate — with no guarantee of success.
I’m not here to make any predictions, but whatever your take on this, it’s hard to see any of this as good news.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(2) People who are experts on other countries -- say, Russia, Ukraine or Belarus -- may have smart and thoughtful things to say, but that doesn't make them experts on Kazakhstan.
(3) Comparisons to other countries -- Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, etc -- can be instructive and enlightening, but they need to be structured in order to be useful. We need to know what we're comparing and why, if we want to use the comparison wisely.
And before anyone starts with the “Putin isn’t a socialist” argument, you’re right — he isn’t.
But neither were the Soviet leaders Putin knew best. By the time Brezhnev came to power, it was about power, not socialism.
Brezhnev presided over the creation of essentially oligarchic control of the economy (a term scholars were using in the early 80s, _not_ a retcon). See Robert Tucker, Val Bunce and others writing in the 1980s.
This is a bad headline — but it’s even worse policy. TL;DR on a quick thread: The US (and Europe) should open doors to Russian citizens vaccinated with Sputnik-V. washingtonpost.com/world/2021/09/…
First, on the headline: the US isn’t actually closing the door on Russians or anyone else. It’s opening the door to people vaccinated with WHO-approved vaccines (more or less) — a list that doesn’t include any of the vaccines available in Russia.
But while not opening the door isn’t the same as closing it, Russians could be forgiven for seeing the difference as somewhat trifling.
Now, I can already hear the howls from some on here: “Who cares!” We should all care.
A friend recently dropped off an old @CarnegieRussia brochure, and while it’s from well before my time at the CMC, I couldn’t help but share the nostalgia! (Russia hands may find this amusing. Or not. Caveat emptor.)
First things first: Alexei Arbatov never changes. Ever.
So, just over 24-hours into Russia's three-day electoral bonanza, and it's going more or less as you might have expected. TL;DR: The Kremlin's not taking its chances.
A few observations follow, with the caveat that info is thus far limited, and there are still 2 days to go.
/1
First: There are widespread reports of what can best be described as shenanigans. These don't have the feel of a massive, centrally coordinated falsification campaign, but they do feel like a massive uncoordinated falsification wave. Pick your poison.
/2
In this context - and before proceeding - it's worth re-re-upping a point re-upped by @Ben_H_Noble in @MoscowTimes: Russian authoritarianism often operates through decentralized proactive compliance, rather than centralized control and coercion.
/3
The Russian government has just declared @BardCollege an undesirable organization. Anyone - teacher or student - who has any dealings with Bard is now subject to criminal prosecution in Russia. Frankly, I’m at a loss for words.
Bard has been foundational in the development of liberal arts education in Russia - and by liberal, I mean pedagogically, not politically. Its collaborations with St Petersburg State Uni have operated under the aegis of no less a figure than Alexei Kudrin.
In other words, this isn’t a small deal. This is a very, very big deal, and it will cause every western university that has any partnerships with Russia to step back and think.