Some thoughts on our history and our democracy - and our COLLECTIVE obligation to know the former as we defend the latter on this eve of January 6. Thread:
1/ There is a tension at the heart of our founding documents. We were founded by rebels who rejected one authority, then sought to build a country around a new authority they created.
2/ Our founding declaration takes it as a stated truth that it was "necessary to dissolve the political bands" that previously held them together. How would then then ask Americans to commit to a new set of bands?
3/ That matters because for our founders, the UNITED states was always an aspiration, but never a guarantee. Their first effort (the Articles of Confederation) failed to bind the states in a coherent union.
4/ That "spirit of 1776" was one of rebellion, not of acquiescence. When Daniel Shays didn't like his taxes he didn't wait for the next election; he led a rebellion.
5/ And so our founders had to come up with something to bind a country that didn't have a common race, tribe, religion or even language - none of the trappings that most countries used to create a national identity.
6/ Their genius in 1789 was our Constitution. The British would sing God Save the Queen. We Americans would take an Oath to defend our Constitution. It was a stroke of genius and has served us well for these 232+ years as the thing that unified us. A shared rule of law.
7/ It wasn't perfect. Heck, they'd already amended it 10 times by 1791. And it totally kicked the can on the slavery question. But it aspired to a United States and gave us the framework to preserve one.
8/ The Civil War would of course test that proposition again and compel more amendments. But in the end, there was - in Lincoln's famous words - just enough virtue in the nation to save it.
9/ The fact that it has adapted to the moment and survived this long, and that we have held together has inspired lots of other countries to copy our Constitutional democracy. But past performance is no guarantee of future results.
10/ And any country founded in rebellion always has a dangerous fuse that can be lit if some fraction of people can be persuaded that it is patriotic to take up arms against their government.
11/ This is the core question raised by January 6th. A free and fair election elected Joe Biden. The former guy, rather than upholding his oath to defend the constitution told people that it was time to rebel. Some listened, and the fuse was lit.
12/ Most of course did not. Because there is still enough virtue in the nation to save it. But there are a meaningful number of people, many currently still in high office who remain deeply hostile to the principles of our Constitution. To free elections. To democracy.
13/ If a foreign power had attacked the US Capitol seeking to overturn our Constitution we would have a bipartisan consensus to oppose. We know that because we did when the British attacked the Capitol in the War of 1812.*
14/ * In fairness, the Federalists were a little too pro-British on that front, but that support was the beginning of the end of their party. But I digress.
15/ So the question now for all of us who have taken that Oath to protect the Constitution from all enemies, foreign AND domestic will treat this attack in the same way. There can be no ambiguity on that question.
16/ But ultimately, we won't be saved by the 537 of us who hold federally elected office alone. It is on all of us as Americans. Do you love our democracy and our Constitution enough to defend it in this moment? I certainly do.
17/ Not with violence but with a commitment to strident civic engagement. In peaceful demonstrations, in organization and yes, at the ballot box. With the recognition that it is, in this moment a deeply partisan act to defend our democracy.
18/ That is a tragic thing to say about the party of Lincoln. But it cannot be ignored.
19/ But take comfort in the fact that there is still more than enough virtue in the nation to save it. Those anti-Constitutionalists wouldn't be fighting so hard if they thought their views could win in a free and fair election.
20/ Our democracy can, and will still work. It did when we went back onto the floor in the wee hours of January 7 to certify the results.

It will this time as well.

But only if we preserve it. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

16 Dec 21
This is not a "small circle of Republican lawmakers". It's the majority of the @HouseGOP, including their leadership. It is no hyperbole to say that if they get control, it is the end of US democracy as we know it. nytimes.com/2021/12/15/us/…
Remember, on December 10 2020 126 members of the @HouseGOP signed onto the amicus brief to the Supreme Court asking them to overturn the results in GA, MI, PA and WI. Those signers included McCarthy, Scalise, Brady. projects.propublica.org/represent/memb…
You don't get a delegation this big without prodding from leadership. They decided democracy was against their interest and worked to subvert it.
Read 6 tweets
15 Dec 21
Oil industry shills gonna shill. But what if I told you there was a way to lower the cost of fossil fuel by 100%? Efficiency, conservation renewables. And its all in the Build Back Better Act. Spare me your crocodile tears, shills. ogj.com/general-intere…
Here's the thing: no one in the oil and gas wants cheap oil and gas prices. And no one outside of the oil and gas industry wants to spend a penny more on keeping themselves warm and well lit than they have to.
Their hostility to Build Back Better isn't because they are suddenly advocating against their economic interests. Its because they know that every time we invest in a clean energy asset that's one more nail in their coffin. They can't compete on price once those assets are built.
Read 8 tweets
14 Dec 21
Do not lose sight of the fact that - notwithstanding their panicked calls to Meadows - the majority of the @HouseGOP voted to overturn the election just hours later and their media shills acquiesced.
There is a deep, anti-democratic rot that has infected their party. Most are traitors. The rest are cowards. It is a righteous and welcome thing in a democracy to disagree on policy. It is something else entirely to disagree on democracy itself.
@GOPLeader couldn't lead his way out of a paper bag. He will not save them. The media is too obsessed with both sides-ism to acknowledge the rot.
Read 6 tweets
9 Dec 21
A quick conversation about what happened in the House last night that distills the rot at the heart of the @GOP. If you think that sounds partisan. Read on, cause these are all facts...
1/ We spent 3 hours on the floor voting individually on 30 separate "suspensions". These are bills that our rules allow us to pass without the more formal process of debate and deliberation, but only provided we can secure 2/3rds on passage.
2/ To be clear, they are important bills. Administrative changes to procedures. Honoring those who served with the naming of public facilities. Clarifying research budgets. All, by definition, very bipartisan.
Read 12 tweets
7 Dec 21
Great to see supply chains debottlenecking, trade deficits narrowing and US business exports surging. Thank you @POTUS! cnbc.com/2021/12/07/us-…
BUT... watch this data. So much of our recent surge in natural gas and gasoline prices has been because of the surge in exports rather than increased domestic demand. Will be eager to see raw data and see if domestic supply is keeping up to avoid price inflation.
See this for some data on how gasoline exports have been putting upward pressure on prices at the pump in recent months.
Read 4 tweets
6 Dec 21
This is an excellent point from @ThePlumLineGS. Public figures can and do shape public opinion, but we give them a pass when we assume that "public will" is some immutable state of nature, for elected officials to follow. Some thoughts: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
1/ It sounds heretical for an elected official to say "we can change public opinion". And yet if we didn't believe that to be true then marketing wouldn't exist. Everyone who's ever sold something had to first convince people they needed it.
2/ Ask yourself what toothpaste you prefer, then ask yourself on what rational basis you decided that [whitening] / [ADA approved] / [insert brand] / [minty fresh] is the logical choice. You made a decision, then you rationalized it.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(