Al Coda: I did not expect this to blow up but it confirm the fact that white Calvinists refuse to see themselves as a culture. If I said, "Black church culture," people nod. But to say "modern white Calvinist culture" the response is about why I hate white people or Calvinism.
This is what happens when you're the dominant culture in a cocoon and the center of your own conversations. Everything you do/think is the standard. Standards are exempt from analysis and critique. "White evangelicalism" is a culture. It's not a theology. It can generate data.
Many parts of White Calvinist culture really does believe it is the standard by which to judge all other forms of Christianity.
To talk about "white Calvinism" is not say anything about the theology of the Reformed tradition but the culture of the people who think they own it. Whenever evangelicals say, "the church" I always know they don't mean John 17, which includes Catholics, Orthodox, Lutherans, etc.
I was raised in a traditional UMC, black church context and then became Presbyterian. I was never a part of evangelical culture. I honestly don't know why a confessional Presbyterian wants to be identified with evangelical culture. I don't get it. The OPC seems to better at this.
However, if you'd like to know my *actual* views on theology, race, etc. I have several books (that obviously based on the many of the assumptions I'm hearing) people have never read). So, start here: amazon.com/Something-Seem…
My views on politics and theology are here (don't @ me about the price. I don't get to choose where I publish books and they were the only ones that wanted it at the time): amazon.com/Political-Econ…
Race and evangelical culture (which I research for a living like one researches rural tribes in Papua New Guinea is here (read the appendix): amazon.com/Aliens-Promise…
The most disappointing response was the dismissiveness that this is some version of wokeness. That this discussion is some kind of emotional attack on the "constituencies" in evangelical culture; as if the search and pursuit of truth isn't the goal.
The goal is preaching to and supporting the tribe. Oddly, you'd think that a historian of the South would be more sympathetic to why these discussions of the lived experiences of blacks within the history of American Calvinism and evangelicalism are important & isn't wokeness.
Finally, from the many responses, it's obvious to me that the 1965-2020 was an incredibly painful experience for so many people raised in evangelical and white Calvinist contexts. I get it. I have the medical bills to prove it. Don't blame the Trinity for the mistakes of mortals.
This all started for me 1998, when I saw a then PCA pastor defending the Antebellum South against a PC-USA minister. At the end, Steve Wilkins said that it's time to "take up once again The Cause of The South." He got a standing ovation. I collapsed. c-span.org/video/?101481-…
I thought, if this is the PCA why did no one at RUF tell my that being in the PCA meant believing the South was right during the Civil War. The next blow was teaching at Covenant Seminary & received a tsunami of racial slurs, 2004-2011. No leader publicly rebuked them. No one.
"For at least 6 YEARS I have been repeatedly, and regularly called "nigger," "Anthony Bradley, the Negro Prince of the PCA," "The Token Negro and Filthy Pervert and a Stain on the Bedsheets of Life," "Anthony Bradley, the Affirmative Action Ph.D," krusekronicle.com/kruse_kronicle…
This is why Miles Smith concern whether or not scholars like me "like their constituencies" actually proves my point. He doesn't take this conversation seriously. And why would he? The constituency never called him "a nigger" or the "Negro Prince of the PCA." He can't understand.
The way Du Mez has been treated reminded me of the way I was treated and if anyone's actually read my views in print assuming that I'm "woke" is the dumbest conclusion ever or that I've "acceded to the zeitgeist and sprinkled a little Jesus on top."~Smith. Such ignorant nonsense.
Many of you have decided to leave the communities that treated you terribly. That's fine. I decided to stay, which many think is pretty stupid of me. I've recently taken flack for leaving the black community "to take care of white people's kids." Do what's best for you & move on.
For all you who sent encouraging comments and were kind enough RT and offer encouragement, I want to offer a heartfelt "Thank You." You all were a great encouragement to begin 2022!! Love y'all!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The main cause of the vitriol against Du Mez et al is that the TGC, SBC, DG, 9 Marks, Acts 29, Calvinist etc. world never saw itself as a sociological object of critique. There is now an entire academic world focussed on their failures & Reformed men are losing their minds.
The TGC/DG/etc. world is a Christian culture lacking epistemic humility and discourages self-critique. Internal critics are called “anti-gospel.” They built an entire platform based on critiquing *everyone* but themselves & taught an entire generation of pastors to do the same.
Modern white Calvinists, in their arrogance, conflated their religious culture with “the gospel” itself. To critique their religious culture is somehow equivalent to critiquing Jesus, the gospel, the Bible, etc. It’s unreal!
Not a racial justice issue but an issue of disadvantage. My story: (1) I left the black church to attend a PCA seminary. Many of my classmates had their home PCA churches cover some tuition. That was impossible for me. I took out loans. (2) Then, I went to Westminster seminary
which at the time gave no money for PhD students. I watched my classmates have PCA churches pay for their entire PhD program. I didn't have those connections. I took out loans. Of that group, I'm the only full-time professor. Some minorities are at a profound disadvantage...
in terms of education in Reformed, evangelical, PWI spaces. While we're told, "we're so glad you're here. I watched all of the well connected white guys leave school with no debt. I can name two guys that had wealthy white guys write one check for their entire grad education.
Male pastors tend to have low testosterone. This may explain a lot about why so many avoid conflict and may be threatened by higher T men & strong women. Data: "Men in less competitive fields--ministers and farmers--tend to have low testosterone." amazon.com/Heroes-Rogues-…
This may also explain much about the transition in the 1840s from the sons of industrial class sending sons to seminary to the sons of farmers, Southern slave-holding agricultural class, etc. sending sons to seminary. Southerners generally chose Princeton Seminary.
Low T men are less likely to take risks, etc. Also, "[r]esearch has also found that anticipatory stress can reduce testosterone levels in men...men with low testosterone levels tend to have more anxiety and irritability." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Whenever a fraternity gets suspended it’s confirmation that society has abandoned young men & left them on their own to figure out what it means to be an adult. Faculty presence alone would put an end to fraternity suspensions. google.com/amp/s/www.wate…
Why do expect a generation of high school guys and college men to act like they have father-figures as mentors forming their virtue,
& inviting them to greatness, when they have literally been abandoned by a culture that thinks it’s sexist to have unique spaces where boys are taught by wise elders how to men who use their strengths to sacrifice for others? Instead if investing in them, we give up on them.🤷🏾♂️
The Ockenga/Henry/Graham(OHC) evangelical era is officially over (1942-2022). It will not survive the current fissures of race (CRT, anti-racism) & politics (tribalism). It was already on life-support, then Trump happened followed by George Floyd's murder. It was a good run.
I've surveyed a few articles on the current evangelical divisions and they all focus on the wrong issues. How the gospel is defined is *not* the issue, nor merely views of politics, etc. What really matters is how sin and evil are defined. In other words, "what's the problem?"
American Protestantism was doomed from the beginning because of a lack of consensus about the meaning of sin. Is sin primarily an individual issue (demanding substitutionary atonement) or systemic/structural (demanding social justice)?
I am fascinated by the political ideology expressed here and what this signals about the currents in evangelicalism. Is it the role of government to force companies to have leave policies? Or should workers only work at companies that do have such policies?
Also interesting: the sociology of these policies. When children were born adjacent to grandparents, the policies weren't needed as much. When extended family networks disintegrated in a careerist culture, gov't policies were proposed to replace what family networks used to do.
There's incredibly good data on this: the key person who contributes to infant thriving is grandmothers. When you chose not live near grandmothers, there are more demands for family leave. I find this sociology fascinating. No grandmothers, no society. smithsonianmag.com/science-nature…