In the summer of 2020, the life of a POTUS was endangered by lefty rioters so much so that he and family were rushed to the bunker.

If not for the Secret Service there (60 agents were wounded), it could have been a successful insurrection.

It was treated as a big joke.
The point above is that a mass trespassing event inflamed by trigger-happy cops doesn’t deserve any attention beyond understanding why PD was this brutal and why civil rights of political dissidents are getting crushed with impunity since then.

#PutinsAmerica.
It was a joke when POTUS Trump was bunkered due to political violence in 2020 that left 60+ USSS agents/officers wounded. I am not adapting any crazy language about a mass trespassing event that had barricade pushers and some who instinctively reacted to a brutal crackdown by PD.
Most comments about the mass trespassing event that was inflamed by a brutal police crackdown is in the context of people’s stance on Trump, but he is a selfish 🐓 💩 🐖 yet I still don’t want to be had by propaganda especially one that is used to crush people’s rights.

Simple.
Feds R still posting images of people who trespassed on Jan 6th or who pushed barricades. There was no such mobilization against those who wounded 60 USSS agents during the 2020 insurrection that forced POTUS into a bunker.

Lack of action there shows that 1/6 is fully political.
I haven’t seen Con Inc. or Never Trumpers worked up about the 2020 insurrection.

I genuinely have no idea why that incident is a joke! A POTUS was bunkered due to the violence!

What was the plan of those insurrectionists? Rush the WH and stop short of killing Trump?
No matter how smart and independent you think you are, my rhetoric in this thread is falling on deaf ears because you were not exposed to a year-long propaganda campaign regarding that 2020 incident the way where you were propagandized regarding January 6.

Not your fault BTW.
Today, 1/6/21 was called by Dems a

- Riot

- Attack

- Armed Insurrection

- Coup

- Invasion. Yes Invasion.

Lack of a unified term by the hypers of Jan 6th, illustrates that it was neither of the terms used but a mass trespassing event inflamed by a brutal PD crackdown.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yossi Gestetner

Yossi Gestetner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YossiGestetner

5 Jan
The minute you call it a “violent terrorist attack on the capitol,” you lose most of your standing when complaining about the DOJ, Dems and Media because they have diff views than you how to handle a “violent terrorist attack on the capitol.”

cc @ColumbiaBugle @KurtSchlichter
That is @tedcruz.

Cruz, the “fighter.”

He called now Jan 6th “a violent terrorist attack on the capitol.”

Hahaha.

GOP - Group of Putzes.

It’s not @LeaderMcConnell or @GOPLeader. It’s the fabric of the party.

cc @Cernovich @julie_kelly2
He didn’t mention BLM or the insurrection at the WH last year that forced a POTUS into the bunker and wounded 60 USSS staff.

The GOP is a systemic clown show.
Read 11 tweets
29 Dec 21
1/ Crazies told me 14 day lockdowns are insane. Current rule: 5 days are cool.

Crazies told me that asymptomatic people are not the main factor of spread. Current rule: Infected asymptomatic people can rock and roll
2/ Crazies told me there are false/immaterial positives with COVID-19. Current rule: No need for a negative test at the end of isolation because positives can show up as long as 12 weeks after infection.
3/ Crazies told me that we need to consider other factors of society during COVID-19. Current Fauci stance: Yes, that’s what we need to do which is why we cut the isolation time.
Read 5 tweets
28 Dec 21
1/

🔥 🔥 🔥

CDC data.

From Feb 2020 through Sept 2021 in the US among all ages there were 44,650 COVID cases per 100,000 people in the population and 280.7 deaths among those cases.

This is a death rate of 0.62% and is 6 times worse than the flu’s usual 0.1% fatality rate.
2/ COVID’s death rate is on an illness where people were told to wait it out at home except if they needed the hospital.

Do this for the flu and I doubt that its death rate will remain at 0.1% of cases.

Absent such COVID rules, who knows how lower COVID’s rate may have been.
3/ I am bringing this up because lockdowns were made in March 2020 with the assumption that COVID’s death rate is 1.0% - 3.0% of cases which would be 10-30 times worse than the flu. Yet the CDC’s data puts it at 6 x worse than the flu (despite the panicked changes to healthcare).
Read 4 tweets
27 Dec 21
Reminder that Pfizer’s COVID—19 vaccine “has been authorized for emergency use to prevent COVID-19 in ages 16+.”

That’s Pfizer’s own tweet from 7 months ago.

Again: “to prevent COVID-19.”

Will anyone at @CNBC ask Pfizer Boarf Member @ScottGottliebMD about this?
“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus STOPS with every vaccinated person.” - @maddow in late March of this year. (Source of this show is @NBCNews @MSNBC or whoever will try to get this shaming tweet down for “copyright.” It isn’t. I am giving due credit.)
“You are not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” - Biden in July.

(Source of this show is @CNN or whoever in that cooperation will try to get this shaming tweet down for “copyright.” It isn’t. I am giving due credit but real rules don’t matter around here.)
Read 6 tweets
27 Dec 21
1/ Thread. I know I am talking here mostly to the 4 walls, but as an exercise I’ll tweet these thoughts and if you are one of the few to read it, thank you.

We are often told to “trust the science,” but the science of trust is to earn it; you can’t force people to trust you.
2. In recent years, however, little has been done to earn the public’s trust. For starters, there is no THE science as science is a developing thing. What’s more, to claim “the science is settled” is strange as science as a topic is about constant study.

How can it be settled?
3/ Besides, if you have the numbers, show it. Why do you need to ask for people to trust it? Furthermore, many people “trust” “the” science, but they just distrust your policy solutions to the science and your motives behind ths policies that you want to impose on the public.
Read 41 tweets
27 Dec 21
Fauci, @@ScottGottliebMD and others keep saying that past infection gives some immunity but it’s better to also have the C19 shots.

Why can’t we have running data on natural immunity? Not half-baked, misrepresented studies. Raw, steady data.

cc @drsanjaygupta @andrewrsorkin
There is data on ICU and COVID-19 deaths based on vaccination status. Why not another column on whether the person already had COVID per a PCR (and how long ago 6, 9, 12, 15 months)? Why the blackout on such critical data especially that the vaccines don’t hold like Polio, MMR?
If C19 shots stopped the spread (as Biden claimed in July 2021), and if the shots held long, you can perhaps argue everyone should get the shots for the greater good as done to other diseases. But cases R now worse than pre-vaxx and shots are not a dead end, so (next tweet)
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(