1/15
Why is torsemide my preferred loop diuretic when treating heart failure?

As a follow-up to a recent tweetorial on furosemide and gut edema, let me offer a 3-part ode to torsemide.
2/
It's worth noting up-front that torsemide is NOT the most commonly used loop diuretic.

In a study of 274,515 patients diagnosed with heart failure, the discharge loop diuretics were:

➤ Furosemide 87%
➤ Bumetanide 3%
➤ Torsemide 0.4%
➤ Combo 10%

t.ly/7qZo
3/
A more recent poll (conducted today!) confirms the dominance of furosemide.

So there is a lot of work needed to convert folks to torsemide. My argument has 3 parts.

4/
A 2001 open-label RCT looked at torsemide vs furosemide in 234 patients hospitalized with a history of heart failure. At 1 year, ≥1 readmission occurred in:

➤ 17% on torsemide
➤ 32% on furosemide

Torsemide patients were also less fatigued.

t.ly/yzDI
5/
TORIC was an open-label, non-randomized, post-marketing surveillance trial of 1377 patients with heart failure. Those who received torsemide had...

➤ ↓ mortality
➤ Improved heart failure class

...when compared with other loop diuretics.

t.ly/cgcg
6/
Meta-analysis of RCTs supports reductions in readmission but not mortality.

t.ly/OYQe
7/
The ongoing TRANSFORM-HF should provide a more definitive answer.

This study is randomizing patients hospitalized with heart failure to torsemide or furosemide prior to discharge. It aims to enroll 6000 patients and be completed by August 2022.

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03…
8/
Assuming the evidence favors torsemide, what explains the difference? At least 2 things may be contributing:

(1) Torsemide has preferred pharmacokinetics/dynamics
(2) Torsemide may be more than just a loop diuretic
9/
Here is a comparison of three common loop diuretics.

Items in green are "wins" for a particular diuretic.
10/
There are a few key differences favoring torsemide:

➤ More reliable oral bioavailability
➤ Longer duration of action, allowing for daily dosing

Also, if one factors in daily versus BID dosing, the cost of torsemide is no different than furosemide.

t.ly/IDtk
11/
There is evidence suggesting that torsemide blocks aldosterone receptors. Supporting this is a study showing...

↑ Plasma renin
↑ Aldosterone

...in those receiving torsemide, but not those receiving furosemide.

t.ly/Bklq
12/
Aldosterone antagonism may explain another finding of the study in tweet 5. Here's how many patients required potassium supplementations:

➤ Torsemide 3%
➤ Other loop diuretics 30%

t.ly/cgcg
13/
Aldosterone may play a role in myocardial fibrosis. If torsemide blocks aldosterone activity it may also have anti-fibrotic effects.

This is supported by a study showing a ↓ in serum carboxyl-terminal peptide of procollagen type I with torsemide.

t.ly/Vg6f
14/
Collectively, there is good support for the idea that torsemide does more than simply promote natriuresis/diuresis.

Whether these additional effects lead to observed differences in patient-centered outcomes isn't as clear.
15/15 SUMMARY
⚡️Available evidence favors torsemide over furosemide
⚡️Torsemide has better pharmacokinetics and a longer duration of action
⚡️Torsemide may be more than a loop diuretic!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Breu

Tony Breu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tony_breu

31 Dec 21
1/17
[Why] is furosemide susceptible to malabsorption from "gut edema"?

When a patient with heart failure is hospitalized with congestion I often hear "let's use IV furosemide; they're probably not absorbing the PO."

It's a comment unique to furosemide.

But is it accurate?
2/
In order to understand what happens in heart failure, we must first understand what happens under normal conditions.

🔑Furosemide absorption is in the small intestine and stomach
🔑Some data suggest greater absorption in the duodenum than stomach

t.ly/JjdK
3/
Regarding oral bioavailability:

🔑 It is highly variable (ranging from 11-100%) even in those without heart failure
🔑 This variability is both between patients and within the same patient

t.ly/a0CU
Read 18 tweets
27 Nov 21
1/13
Why does adrenal insufficiency (particularly adrenal crisis) lead to hypotension?

I don't think of glucocorticoids as "pressors" and yet when they're lacking patients are at great risk for shock.

Let's have a look.
2/
Hypotension has long been associated with adrenal insufficiency.

For example, one report of 108 cases of Addison's Disease (i.e., primary adrenal insufficiency) found that:

⚡️88% of patients presented with hypotension

PDF: t.ly/aDzv
3/
In primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI), hypotension is partly due to volume depletion related to mineralocorticoid deficiency.

But even in PAI the hemodynamic profile isn't simply ↓cardiac output from ↓venous return (i.e., volume depletion).

PDF: t.ly/Ooej
Read 13 tweets
31 Oct 21
1/15
Why are statins administered at night?

In this tweetorial I'll discuss the mechanistic and historical reasons for the frequently used QHS dosing schedule. And why it's often unnecessary.

But before we get there, I'm curious: when do you prescribe/order/take statins?
2/
Early studies suggested that evening administration of statins led to a greater reduction in cholesterol when compared with morning dosing.

Two notes on the linked study:
➤It is small
➤The differences in LDL reduction weren't as clear

PDF: t.ly/6wfc Image
3/
As a result of this early data, the package insert for lovastatin, the first FDA-approved statin, suggested evening dosing.

And the landmark 4S trial did the same, administered simvastatin in the evening.

Insert: t.ly/GsOy
4S: t.ly/9mqS ImageImage
Read 15 tweets
14 Aug 21
As I noted in a recent tweetorial, Raymond Pearl reported a lower frequency of cancer in those with evidence of tuberculosis.

This finding led Pearl and others to treat patients with tuberculin.

Unfortunately, Pearl's original study methods suffered from bias.
More specifically, Pearl's study sample contained an overrepresentation of exposed controls (i.e., control subjects who had died from tuberculosis).

This led to an incorrect conclusion that tuberculosis is associated with decreased rates of cancer.
Pearl published a "retraction" in Science.

While arguing that "any serious student of the matter" would agree that TB and cancer are rarely found together in the same person, he admits that concluding a mechanistic connection "may have been erroneous".

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17777405/
Read 5 tweets
14 Aug 21
1/16
Why do we use a vaccine (BCG) to treat an unrelated malignancy (bladder cancer)?

Can infections really prevent/treat cancer?

Let's find out.
2/
This story begins in 1813 when Arsène-Hippolyte Vautier reported that patients suffering from gas gangrene experienced a decrease in the size of their malignant tumors.

An explanation (or even the causative bacterium!) wasn't immediately apparent.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28202530/
Read 19 tweets
26 Jul 21
1/15
Why does clostridium difficile infection (CDI) cause marked leukocytosis?

Many of you have likely seen a new WBC >20k and wondered "could this patient have CDI?"

Are you right to wonder? If so, why?
2/
To start, is there a connection?

One of the earliest studies examined patients with WBC >30k. They reported the following rates of CDI:

🔹20% of all cases (excluding those with heme malignancy)
🔹34% of patients with an infectious etiology

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12032893/
3/
In another study included 60 patients with unexplained leukocytosis (WBC >15k) and found:

⚡️58% had CDI⚡️

And: leukocytosis preceded recorded symptoms of colitis in half of the patients.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14599633/
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(