One path-dependent fact of history is that the covid mar 2020 dump regrettably flushed out a lot of true believers, cryptonatives, who were long for halving. On the way up, crypto caught a bid from macro funds looking for a higher beta play to monetary conditions.
I'm in the camp that with or without covid crypto was gonna go up anyway--the covid flush-out simply changed the makeup of the participants. The BTC/SPX correlation increased substantially.
What we're seeing now is an unraveling of macro fund positions as taper comes closer.
This is healthy, and much needed for the market. One of the biggest reasons I was bearish in Nov was bc I could sense that this type of participant would be taking profit every 5k higher on BTC anyway. Would be too facile for market to give them a cozy exit.
So who's left after this? 1) individuals /families looking to store value on high time frames 2) individuals looking for greater economic freedom and opportunity in an on-chain world 3) investors looking to deploy in the fastest growing secular trend of the last decade
This capitulation + transfer of risk back to the market was very important for crypto. I expect much lower spx/crypto correlations going forward. It's not a coincidence that the coiners macro boomers own the least of are holding up the best now (near, atom, ftm)
At current levels
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I left w the takeaway that they were likely right that crypto is much more than about just storing value, but skeptical that BCH was the answer to that. It got me quite interested in ETH bc I felt BCH/ETH epistemology was similar but the ETH community was more growth-oriented
I think there's a world where BCH was a friendly fork (maybe branded as an airdrop or canary network like ksm:dot) and history would be v different today
Also think the fighting hurt BTC culture a lot too by radicalizing the views of those who won
Bitcoin's raison d'etre is a decentralized network whose rules are difficult to change. What it sacrifices in utility, it gains in provenance and the security of knowing that all others who partake are similarly aligned.
This appeals to families+ppl valuing sovereignty.
It solves the question of "what would an asset that I can buy and hold for 30yrs w a large % of net worth look like." Leaning on utility as value prop weakens this solution. Many companies thought of as indispensable one decade ago are worthless now.
Crypto VCs do not buy Bitcoin in their vehicles mainly bc their LPs do not want them to, since paying 2/20 on BTC is gross. In turn, VCs posit that what they're doing will generate excess returns. This is natural.
Web3 + Bitcoin are synergistic technologies in a new world order.
@lightcrypto is one of the legends, we would not have made it in 2018/2019 if not for his sagacity
We were born in the darkness, you are summer children
Bearish whales still own 10x more coins than you, they save the entire mkt during bear
He is also the only guy (maybe also @GiganticRebirth ) sounding any kind of alarm over tremendous froth in certain sectors
Spot longs w money you can afford to lose are fine; do not put yourself in a position to get wiped out as things continue, make sure you stay in your seat
90% of my top signal list that I wrote down in q1 2019 while it was still fresh in my memory are now hit
No interest in calling tops for clout or having you sell bottoms for psyops, enough wealth for many lifetimes already
I'll always be grateful to the Ethereum ecosystem for the opportunities its granted us since we started. I was getting triggered by a small subset of ppl, and need to respect that they do not represent the larger community.
Do want to remind ppl that in 2019 the pt of DeFi was to bank the unbanked. And that in 2016 many Ethereans criticized Bitcoin for $0.05 fees. Fast fwd to now and huge amts of users are shut out, their funds stuck onchain, etc. Monthly user count similar to 2017.
For me the biggest counterpoint to "everything bubble" is we are in secular K-shape recovery. What they don't teach in school is DCF analysis has some assumptions about the structure of businesses themselves; that they grow in initial phase and then stop at a terminal growth rate
If you think about it, DCF analysis will force you into buying every value trap bc its cash flows look cheap. Conversely it forces you to miss every good network effect asset, bc its growth rate eclipses all reasonable estimates by reasonable analysts, including bulls
We are entering the golden era of investing in network effects, of which sound money / smart contract protocols + applications / mimetic revolutions (NFT, metaverse, memes) are the most clear opportunities