Oh, how could Rachel Maddow possibly defend herself against this granite-skulled entitlement meatsuit and his lethal Word Salad Six-Shooter
CAWTHORN: As a conservative, I insist that Trump won the election, COVID is no worse than the flu, and anyone who claims differently has been brainwashed by the liberal media
D: Jesus, please shut up
CAWTHORN: And the worst thing is that LIBERALS WANT TO SILENCE US
D: Can we?
R: So you admit it?
D: Yes; when people repeatedly tell dangerous lies & are impervious to any facts that would persuade a rational person otherwise, the next best option is for them to stop polluting the discourse with bullshit
R: LIBERALS WANT TO SILENCE US
D: Yes
R: NEVER!
R: Aren’t you forgetting about the First Amendment?
D: I’m not saying the government should punish you or anything, but that doesn’t mean Rachel Maddow is obligated to indulge you when you repeatedly & unapologetically lie
R: But how am I supposed to trigger the liberals now
R: You liberals got Trump thrown off of Twitter
D: Yep
R: And Marjorie Taylor Greene
D: Yep
R: I’ll bet you’d be happy if all of us anti-vax MAGA patriots who refuse to listen to a single thing you say were banned from social media forever
D: Pretty much
R: But how are you liberals supposed to survive inside your information bubble where you’re prevented from ever hearing what Tucker Carlson viewers & Daily Wire readers think about Joe Biden & the CDC
D: That sounds wonderful
R: For your own good, we refuse to let that happen
R: You just don’t care about ideological diversity
D: That’s because “ideological diversity” is a term conservatives invented to imply that people with terrible ideas are entitled to proportional representation
R: Well, what if we shut you out of Parler?
D: I think we’d be OK
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We’re acting like we know who the enemy is because Donald Trump told us in no uncertain terms that he refused to accept the results of the election unless he was declared the winner.
No generalizations liberals make about conservatives should overshadow this undeniable truth.
There was no “good faith disagreement” about the Presidential election. It was a coordinated propaganda campaign stemming directly from the former President and his allies in conservative media.
They lied to their followers, shamelessly and repeatedly.
I’m not sure what good it does for us to know that most GOP voters support policies that few, if any, of their preferred elected officials have any intention of implementing. Whereas virtually no Democratic politicians support the extreme policies they use to taint our side.
So I’m genuinely undecided about Merrick Garland right now. I’ve got pro- and anti-Garland voices in my feed, and believe there are legitimate arguments on both sides.
(1/x)
Of course, Democrats have to make their case above ground and by the book. And it’s probably naïve to think that we can land the big fish without convicting many, many intermediate perps along the way.
However.
(2/x)
It is also naïve to suggest court outcomes are objective, or that they are immune to external factors such as urgency, or the perception thereof.
In layman’s terms: the longer this drags out, the less likely that anything will happen to Trump.
Note: These are rhetorical questions, so I assure you that it is absolutely not necessary to respond with your answers. And it’s not as if my Notifications need any more traffic.
JANUARY 6
We commemorate the anniversary of January 6, 2021 because:
(D) the followers of a sitting U.S. President violently attempted to obstruct election certification
(R) brave patriots took to the streets in a valiant effort to restore their true leader to the seat of power
IMPEACHMENT
There are circumstances under which the U.S. Congress has little choice but to impeach a sitting President. That time is when:
(D) he abuses the tremendous power at his disposal
(R) we have a Congressional majority and we fucking feel like it
Welcome to life in 2022, where the lion’s share of what passes for political discourse consists of Explaining Extremely Obvious Things to People Who Refuse to Listen
- Despite what many angry and misinformed people will tell you, Twitter is a private platform with the right to enforce their own standards as they see fit. Nobody is entitled to post here. And being deplatformed is not equivalent to being silenced.
- If Twitter warns you not to say certain things on their platform, and you deliberately and repeatedly choose to say them anyway, you are not a victim. Rather, you have willfully contributed to your own deplatforming from Twitter.
60% of the country believes that the best plan for the pandemic involves social distancing, masks, and vaccines.
The other 40% believes that mask restrictions & vaccine mandates are tools of the Deep State to curtail our freedoms, because they are Out of Their Fucking Minds.
60% of the country believes that there is nothing wrong with public schools acknowledging the existence of institutional racism.
The other 40% think CRT is a Democrat-driven plot to brainwash children into hating white people, because they are Out of Their Fucking Minds.