🧵[Thread] 1/ I have detected a Somalia-focused sockpuppet network spreading pro-UAE, anti-Qatar and anti-Turkish propaganda on Twitter and Reddit. However, their main efforts are criticizing Somalia President Farmajo, and supporting Prime Minister Roble 👉 #disinformation
2/ The network consists of around 30-40 sockpuppet accounts. Like other networks I have documented recently, many of the images feature attractive young millenial/gen z types with fairly professional headshots. They all use Twitter Web App, and tweet in Somali, English or Arabic
3/ Below is a typical sample of a lot of the content from the network. Anti-Farmajo, pro-Roble, pro-UAE, anti-Turkey, and anti-Qatar. The accounts all post banal or trivial influencer-type content between their political posts, for that instagrammable spice 🌶️ #disinformation
4/ I analysed around 3500 tweets from these accounts dating back to around April 2020. The most common word used by the accounts is 'Farmajo', indicating he is the main source of their focus. The accounts were particularly active around the Somali Elections began in late 2021
5/ The network has been active since around early 2020. The below graph shows how they initially focused on criticizing Qatar (pink) and Turkey's (purple) role in Somalia, but has shifted more to talking and criticizing Farmajo (orange). #disinformation
6/ An interesting aspect of this network is that it also active on the r/Somali and r/politics @Reddit . Below are identical images on Twitter and Reddit, but different names. As expected, they post similar content (anti-Farmajo articles/posts ) #disinformation#sockpuppets
7/ There are at least two more of the Somalian disinformation spreaders on Reddit, as you can see below. Some of them also have Facebook profiles (won't post screenshots) #disinformation
8/ Interestingly, after receiving a tip about this network (thanks for that), I looked into it about 3 days ago. Since that time, Twitter has suspended around 16 of the accounts. Actually, Twitter also suspended some of the network back in late 2021, during the elections
9/ However half of the network are still active. Interestingly, 20 of the accounts were easy to find because they blocked me (I had never interacted with them). I also suspected others that hadn't blocked me, many of these were later suspended -thus confirming my suspicions
10/ What's the goal of the network? Well based on a report by @CrisisGroup on 'Somalia and the Gulf Crisis', there was pressure on the Somali government to choose sides, Qatar/Turkey or UAE and co. The network here is clearly aligned with trying to crisisgroup.org/africa/horn-af…
11/ undermine Farmajo and attack the Qatar/Turkey relationship with Somalia. The general discourse is that Farmajo is corrupt, incompetent, disruptive, dishonest while Turkey supports terrorism or wishes to control Somalia. #disinformation#Somalia
11/ To sum up then. Twitter have suspended part of a Somali-focused networked that appears to be attacking Farmajo, Turkey, Qatar, while reflecting UAE foreign policy. The network resembles a similar network I identified a few days ago, but focused on the Muslim Brotherhood.
12/ Given the similar aesthetics, the fact many of them had pre-blocked me, I would say this is part of the same operation, which clearly has different 'files', some focusing in Arabic on muslim brotherhood, others focusing on Horn of Africa and the Somali language.
13/ Anyway, that's all for now, happy Wednesday all!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed.
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people.
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism.
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.
Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants.
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans.
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism.
🧵 'At least 1,800 bots on the social media site X are promoting the controversial choice of Azerbaijan, a major oil and gas producer, to host next month’s ...#COP29, according to a new analysis shared exclusively with The Washington Post".
2/ The analysis by Marc Owen Jones, an expert on disinformation at @NUQatar, focused on roughly 2,800 X accounts that collectively sent around 10,800 tweets, retweets and replies about the conference between Oct. 17 and Oct. 24.
3/ Detection
73% of all accounts active in sample created in the space of 3 quarters in 2024.
Conservative estimates suggest 66% (1876) accounts in the sample are fake (bots) based on activity over the past week