"We will continue to take action"
"We are responding quickly to these reckless Covid-19 breaches"
"Those who continue to flout rules are putting others at serious risk"
"#LondonTogether"
Definitively my favourite.
"Anyone who chooses to flout the rules, and are consciously making decisions which put lives at risk – should expect to have enforcement taken against them."
Funny that I see no mention of Sue Gray's inquiry.
A 100 people gathering to party
"It is deeply concerning and irritating that people are still willing to break the rules and put the health of Londoners at risk."
Now compare and contrast
"This illegal gathering was an insult to those hospitalised with COVID, our NHS staff and everyone staying at home to protect them. Now just give your heartfelt apologies and the police won't enforce the rules to save lives."
Reminder: These people also set an illegal VIP lane to fill their pals' pockets in exchange of dearly needed overpriced and faulty equipment, putting lives at risk, and are now moving to ban your right to protest and gerrymander elections.
Have a good day (while you still can)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Anyone knows if there's a link btw Matthew Elliott (Leave campaigner) & Steven John Elliott (ex-director of SFW Ltd/compagny that provided EU Ref result collation software, who resigned on July 21 in 2016)?
Common name so prob coincidence, just curious
@carolecadwalla @peterjukes
You don’t stand against evil because evil is directed at people you deem worth your support
You stand against evil because evil must be stopped, end of
Please stop saying Ukraine's skirt is too short and focus on stopping the agressor *that happens to be the issue here*
“But escalation”, you say?
(Sigh) #BreakingNews: Ukraine has no intention to invade Russia.
NATO has no intention to invade Russia.
The only thing “endangering Russia” is its shattered imperialist pride at being unable to crash a much smaller country.
Supporting that helps no one
Ukrainians ain’t stupid.
They have exactly 0 interest or will to attack Russian civilians.
They just want Russia out.
On the other hand, Putin blowing up more of his own (as he did to get an ironclad grip on power) to convince them to become canon fodder may be on the table.
Now not saying it’s going to happen but we do know Russia is fine with bombing Ukrainian churches, and the “war against Christianity” rhetoric has been planted already by Western assets like Kremlin Klaxon -er, I meant Tucker Carlson
As the Russian army has been severely hit lately -an info that the Kremlin couldn’t keep from the public-, such an operation to force holy mobilisation on uncooperative Russians while trying to propaganda the West into stopping (finally) useful weapons delivery would be Putinable
In any case it’s obvious this “truce” is nothing but a military operation, the only question being how the details of it.
If they wanted peace, they’d go home.
Imagine your reaction if, after your athlete wins the Olympics, the organising country tells you it cannot play your national anthem as it doesn't have it, and ask if the one from the neighbour country (that invaded and perpetrated genocide on you) is fine...
Watching this, I suddenly realised @komarnyckyj, do you know how I got Ukraine on the map?
Not in school, not in the news..
In Rythmic gymnastics
Катерина Серебрянська, Олена Вітриченко, all the ones who followed...
(And well that's how I got Belarus was a specific culture too)