2/ Now here the comparison USA - Sweden. Shown are age specific mortality rates for the group 15-64 years.
The 2021 excess in US is drastic. Sweden: under mortality. Also last year Sweden did fine on 15-64. Covid did not do this. Hysteria did. Stop it now!
3/ So let's also show the same age group 15-64 for the great pandemic year 2020 and show how Sweden "failed" (to kill the young) while USA was following the pope of science, Dr. Fauci.
Can you see it? Nothing in Sweden.
4/ The explanation is given here, in 2020 already.
2020: Evidence based hypothesis and prediction
2021: USA went failed and Sweden is shining.
This is how hypothesis, experiment, validation works.
Problem: the chosen window of averaging is a strong factor when aggregating. Aggregations are generally bad as mentioned many times. They destroy information.
1/ After checking, that mortality.org is actually showing the age standardized mortality rates under "death rate, total", we can work with their all age value.
Germany: disaster. The lockdowns finally worked. The other way around. Record excess. And continuously over the weeks. This is what politicians and hysteria did. Not the virus.
Austria lockdown master: disaster. The lockdowns finally worked. The other way around. Record excess. And continuously over the weeks. This is what politicians and hysteria did. Not the virus.
1/ I actually don't like working with VAERS. One would need a data-prep tool, which CDC has, but me not (out of scope to develop). Still, I took a look.
The issues with lot IDs and VEARS deaths/AE are:
-Age confounded (average administered dates).
-Different batch sizes.
2/ We immediately see the high age of most deaths and related batches. We do have confounding to resolve. Deaths, both C19 and vaxx, is an elderly business and includes a lot of comorbidities in both cases. The young don't die in relevant numbers from Covid not vaxx.
3/ One thing that looks strange are the low death batches / weeks in many cases for the very old groups. It should follow an exponential life table to my view. There should be no points in the red circled area (high age, low deaths).
@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen They can't explain it. But it's quite easy. The excess is dominated by 85+. Those are fragile people, and having had 2 years lockdowns and panic is not healthy. In Sweden this group is doing fine, as living a social life as mammals are supposed to live. See here.
@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen Both SWE and NL have vaxx levels of 95% in this group. It's irrelevant for the excess. No vaxx can make a damage at this level like NL. It's the lockdown, fear and isolation. Prisoners don't live long. If we continue, we can probably reduce life expectancy by 10 years.
@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen This excess is also in the 75-84 cohort in NL. Also 93% vaxxed in both countries. Nothing in SWE. It's the lockdown. Isolation and fear is unhealthy for social mammal life. Destroys resilience. I bet it's all cardiovascular and respiratory. @rubenivangaalen@KoudijsHenk