A Regional protocol for ICU admittance recognise bias against Unvaccinated
Vaccination status overrides actual medical judgement (Constants' analysis), deriving "IMMEDIATELY" respiratory distressed patients to ICU, ONLY if they're UNVACCINATED
Source: reputed regional newspaper
Vaccination status overrides actual medical judgement (Constants' analysis), deriving "IMMEDIATELY" respiratory distressed patients to ICU, ONLY if they're UNVACCINATED
Source: reputed regional newspaper
https://twitter.com/CorrNotCausa/status/1481771356278636552
"As hospitalisations' profile is very diverse, [Regional HealthService] uses a vaccination status based protocol:
If patient is NOT Vaccinated we proceed more cautiously, cos we know it COULD lead to complications, as in early Pandemic, with bilateral pneumonia developing quickly
If patient is NOT Vaccinated we proceed more cautiously, cos we know it COULD lead to complications, as in early Pandemic, with bilateral pneumonia developing quickly
... and they could need immediate ICU access.
In the other hand, with patients with 1 or 2 does, PERSONNEL DECIDE ICU ADMITTANCE CONSIDERING CONCOMITANT PATHOLOGIES AND OXYGEN SATURATION"
So, if you're Unvaxed you're more likely to be preventively admitted in an ICU
In the other hand, with patients with 1 or 2 does, PERSONNEL DECIDE ICU ADMITTANCE CONSIDERING CONCOMITANT PATHOLOGIES AND OXYGEN SATURATION"
So, if you're Unvaxed you're more likely to be preventively admitted in an ICU
Some concomitant sickness and, of course, age, are much more important than vaccination status
Prioritizing vaccination status, and not the same constants' medical judgement is Covid Szienze
Probably well intentioned caution
Definitely introducing bias on data
Prioritizing vaccination status, and not the same constants' medical judgement is Covid Szienze
Probably well intentioned caution
Definitely introducing bias on data
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
