At some point we’ll have to confront the culture of ‘open secrets’ that everyone seems to know about and nobody ever publishes.
There’s been a recent explosion in stories about public figures that were brushed under the carpet for years. #MeToo was an obvious one. But it’s the tip of the iceberg.
Part of it is Britain’s ferocious libel laws. Part of it is the establishment’s existential drive to preserve its own power. But it is utterly corrosive.
Everyone in political or media circles has heard stories about major public figures involved in sex and drug scandals, among other serious misdemeanours. They are the currency of any social event. Omertà and the fear of litigation stops the chatter going anywhere else.
I’m not even a reporter and I’ve heard credible stories that would bring down major public figures in an instant. But I don’t have proof and I can’t do anything about it. And yet some people - lots of people, actually - do have proof.
Hundreds of people necessarily had proof of these lockdown parties for 18 months and sat on them, for one reason only: it was in their interests to do so. Others have proof of scandals we’ll never even know about.
But in the age of supposed transparency and accountability, ‘one rule for all’, that no longer feels sustainable. It may be in individuals’ personal interest not to blow the whistle on our leaders, but it’s emphatically not in the interest of the public.
The problem goes far beyond the entrenchment of an in and out crowd, where everyone in Westminster knows the scandals and the ‘little people’ never find out about them. It goes to the heart of how we are governed.
If we don’t do anything to change this culture, it will fester and metastasise, breeding the contempt of the people in power and the mistrust of the people they govern - and these scandals will never bloody end.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Lis

Jonathan Lis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonlis1

12 Jan
Johnson apologises. Says he’s learned there are things they didn’t get right. Went into the garden to ‘thank’ people. Believed it was a work event. Rarely seen him look so serious. I guess it’s because for the first time he’s dealing with his own fate and not other people’s #PMQs
It changes absolutely nothing. It wasn’t a work event. He knew it wasn’t. And a week later he threw all his political capital at saving Cummings in a desperate attempt to save his own skin.
🚨🚨🚨Starmer says the R word 🚨🚨🚨
Read 16 tweets
29 Dec 21
My new year’s resolution is not to turn the other cheek when established friends or romantic partners ghost me
This week I challenged a good friend who’d blanked me for months and the sheer arseholery of their reply made me laugh out loud
There’s a serious point. This is meant to be the age of not taking shit from people. And yet when someone close ghosts you you’re supposed to give a free pass. If you challenge them you become the problem - uncool, needy, crazy. It’s not OK. Normalise confronting bad behaviour!
Read 4 tweets
8 Dec 21
Johnson trying to take initiative by apologising for the clip and pretending he was ‘infuriated’ by it. Somehow doubt that will cut it. #PMQs
This, if anything, should make us even angrier. Johnson knew exactly what happened, and knew what he was doing when he spent all week lying through his teeth. He’s coming clean now because he got caught. The end.
Johnson saying people should focus on what’s happening with Covid now, as though this is a matter of historical interest. Starmer notes the current situation requires moral authority and the prime minister doesn’t have any.
Read 6 tweets
1 Dec 21
Starmer going on the Downing Street Christmas party last year. Johnson doesn’t deny it and deflects by asking a question about Starmer’s party this year. Starmer reads him the government’s own rules from the time. This could quickly get interesting. #PMQs
Johnson desperate to talk about the rules *right now*. He has not denied that he held a Christmas party last year, which was in direct contravention of his own lockdown rules.
Starmer twists the knife by pointing out his own MPs not following the current rules on masks. Ties it in with his ‘one rule for us, another for them’ line of attack. This could and should be a story. #PMQs
Read 4 tweets
29 Nov 21
I know the reshuffle has divided opinion but I think it’s been broadly positive. Cooper’s one of Labour’s only genuine big hitters and carries more gravitas than anyone in the government. Lammy as foreign sec a great fit. Nandy in the role she should have had from the start.
Of course Cooper is further to the right on immigration than many of us would like, but that’s where Labour is right now and Patel won’t stand a chance against her. But bizarre to relegate Thornberry and sideline Miliband. Labour needs all the star performers it can get.
Interesting too to look at some of the promotions lower down. Bridget Phillipson has been quietly devastating when attacking gov’s cruelty to children and should flourish at education. Streeting should be effective at health, but that job ought to have Allin-Khan’s name on it.
Read 4 tweets
12 Oct 21
The irony of the last five years is that Theresa May’s empty slogan is the one thing that was actually true and which the British government has never managed to accept: Brexit means Brexit
Neither May nor Johnson ever accepted that Brexit came with consequences: specifically, consequences the UK would itself choose as a direct result of its policies, and which it would then have to live with.
The Northern Ireland debate has been stuck in the same unsquarable circle for five years: that if you deliberately erect a regulatory and customs border with another trading entity, it must actually go somewhere.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(