1 The Kharīda has deep significance to me for another reason.
When I was ~ 16, a relative began expressing doubts about God. We all go through stages of rational maturation in our faith, but his words frightened me. I was concerned and wanted to help him…
2 I think many can relate to the emotions involved in a relative expressing doubts or having a full-blown faith crisis. In cases where the doubts are a by-product of dysfunctional formative bonds, they may even lash out at family members, seeing them as part of the “God problem”
3 So, being the nerd I was, I wrote a small treatise in which I used rational proofs to substantiate the existence of God and to establish several of His Attributes. Prior to that, I had no expose to kalām. I just employed my mind to prove what my heart was absolutely certain of.
4 I wasn’t interested in debate, nor was I indignant, I was genuinely scared for him. He was interested in debate. My treatise did hold it’s own, though. It wasn’t until years later that I discovered that what I’d written was almost exactly upon the pattern of the mutakallimīn…
5 So, my introduction to kalām wasn’t through my mind, but through my heart, my fear for someone I loved, my hope of convincing them of the truth. I think we often lose this spirit in our modern scholarly endeavors. Brainy is much more celebrated than beneficent…
6 In reading scholars of the past - even as I marvel at their genius - I think we often fail to see their vantage of deep conviction and concern. They were high, bringing others up, not low, raising themselves. This is why their works contain such a strong spiritual secret…
7…a secret we rarely grasp. I think the divine mystery lies in their sincerity, or what I call the “intention behind the intention”, or the unified scholarly objective. The Islamic tradition has always been unique is it’s integration of all human faculties toward one sacred end.
8 I previously spoke of the tiers of rational engagement in the Islamic tradition being linked to adherence and submission. The mind is a powerful tool, but it can turn its blade on you. Without the dual facets of heart and mind, working in continuum, spiritual blood is shed.
9 In the Kharīda, itself, we find this embedded integration. When I first read it, I recalled my relative and the treatise I wrote. I saw how Imām Dardīr did what I had tried to do, but so much better. I felt instinctively connected to him. May Allah’s choicest mercy envelop him.
10 So, when you read these works and you marvel at the mind behind them, know, that the heart that you can’t see was even greater. Know, that these giants drew upon a strength that is beyond any mind. This, my friends, is why we show highest reverence, adab, to our Tradition.
May Allah’s infinite peace & blessings be upon Rasūlullāh, his pure progeny & folk, along with his gleaming companions, illuminated inheritors and all his loyal followers until the Last Day.
Yes, of course. There are always people interested in debate. Relax, there is a disagreement among scholars on the permissibility of using rational proofs to substantiate the Attributes of God.
Then, the other half are thinking…
“Didn’t you say kalām is not your cup of tea?”
The loyal lover of fiqh answers…
“الضرورات تبيح المحظورات”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 In surveying Hanafī fiqh books, one finds that jurists were aware of changes in custom, even rapid ones. See two (of many) examples in which Imām Marghīnānī cites “variance of time period” as direct cause for the switching of custom-based rulings.
2 This, in itself, isn’t new. What I found to be interesting, though, is that – on many occasions – this turn over occurred within the lifetimes of the three Imāms themselves. In a span of < 30 years, customs changed and the Imāms rapidly adjusted their rulings accordingly.
3 Considering the current state of ijtihādī stagnation, this level of juristic agility among the Imāms teaches us lessons.
The Imāms
a. weren’t distant from real life
b. exhibited juristic agility in the face of changing trends
c. their fiqh wasn’t rigid, but evolving
While reading -
Delete fluff. Retain main points
Reformat categories with bullets
Color text that sets off a new topic
When you’re done with the book -
Congratulations, you’ve just created a mukhtasar
2 If, during abridgment, you add your own marginalia, explaining terms or concepts that require knowledge from other ‘ulūm or you cross-reference with other works on the subject,
double congrats — you’ve just created a hāshiya that wants to grow up and become a sharh.
3 A key feature of my teaching strategy is guiding students to *produce something* while studying.
This entails benefits such as:
a. note taking skills
b. distillation of main concepts
c. facilitating memorization
d. book mapping
e. prototype authoring
f. student collaboration
Simple tip. Nothing fancy-philosophical, super-sophisticated, or ultra-empirical. Simple but impactful, real.
When reading an Islamic book, orient yourself to search for deeds to add to your practice. Append a sticky note to the inner cover and record them as you go.
1/
When finished, return to your list. Make a plan to practice each item. Some might be long-term goals and some might be immediate habit-goals.
Don’t move onto another book until you’ve actualized your list. Keep the note in the book as a reminder the next time you open it.
2/
This is the real way to acquire sacred knowledge, because what you *know* isn’t what you’ve read, but what has become a part of you. This is true in many fields of study, but no more so than in Islamic studies.
The study of Islam isn’t academic, it’s transformative.
3/
Students of the Hanafi School often come to observe, with time, that the usūl, qawā’id, and dawābit of the madhhab are (in many cases) derived directly or indirectly from the Quran and Sunna. This is a magnificent aspect of the Hanafi thought system.
I gather these examples.
There are so many examples in which the Imāms tried squeezing as much ‘fiqh-juice’ from the Hadīth corpus as possible.
They’d derive whole principles from matters to which we’d scarcely give second thought.
I never ceased to be amazed by the depth of their reading of the Sunna.
Abu Hanīfa didn’t just take the contents of the Prophet’s actions as evidence but even their mode.
It’s so important to recognize how these Imāms employed their intellect. The Sunna wasn’t just texts to them. It was a comprehensive whole.