Just tried to help a friend who runs a very small local business that has nothing to do with online marketing but uses a popular cloud-based website system to draft a GDPR-compliant data/privacy policy that makes sense. Almost impossible.
Of course, it's not the law that is to blame, but the cloud services provider, its invasive personal data processing plus third-party embeds that cannot be turned off, as well as the lack of GDPR enforcement against such services, which is why they still exist as they exist.
It's not the first time I've been struggling with such advice. Don't wanna name the system because I spent already enough time with it on a Sunday evening, but no, building a hand-crafted website or setting up a custom CMS is not an option for many.
Because of the lack of GDPR enforcement, many small 'data controllers' are in the same position as most users/consumers/citizens: they simply don't have a choice. Large corporations take them hostage by trying to shift responsibility to them, and thus, into nirvana.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Anstatt zu schauen, dass endlich keine private Nachhilfe mehr nötig ist, werden 500 Mio Kapital in eine Plattform gepumpt, die sich effizient zwischen Eltern und prekären "Tutoren" schiebt, und die Startup-Community jubiliert. Das is alles derart kaputt. brutkasten.com/gostudent-seri…
Von den €13/Stunde sollen die "Lehrer" dann noch selbst Steuern und Sozialversicherung bezahlen, und wie bei Plattform-Intermediären üblich, versucht GoStudent, sich möglichst von jeder Haftung "freistellen" zu lassen. gostudent.org/agb-tutoren
Adtech/data company "OpenX secretly collected location data and opened the door to privacy violations on a massive scale, including against children"
$2 million settlement b/c of COPPA and FTC Act violations, order to delete "all ad request data": ftc.gov/news-events/pr…
As of today, OpenX 'strongly recommends' app vendors to include the user's exact GPS location in RTB bid requests, and thus broadcasts it to many other data companies in an uncontrolled way.
The FTC's investigation, however, did not focus on harvesting and sharing GPS location data (which it should) but on a specific form of Wi-Fi location tracking.
According to the complaint, OpenX used a 'backdoor method' to circumvent Android permissions. ftc.gov/system/files/d…
Ian Brown on how interoperability could tackle platform power and required safeguards.
Thanks for including my concerns! Done wrong, mandating interoperability can lead to yet other cesspools of data exploitation for the benefit of both small+large businesses rather than people.
I'm much more sceptical about mandating interoperability (aka creating markets) as a fix for platform dominance in several areas. Where it makes sense, data protection law and 'consent' are too weak as safeguards. I think, hard limitations on freedom of contract are the only way.
While I support messenger interoperability, in the EU protected by rights charter article 7 (despite also not trivial), I'm much more sceptical about e.g. financial services.
I'm afraid open banking / PSD2 already led to something similar to 'FB apps for bank transaction data'.
"Collecting data not only from PCs or mobile phones but also from various home appliances ... will lead to a new digital innovation"
Nope, not from a tech company's marketing copy but from a *scientific* paper on personalized advertising 🙄 mdpi.com/2078-2489/12/1…
"psychological factors ... can be utilized to enhance existing personalization models ... Inferring the psychological characteristics of users and inserting them as input variables into a personalization model could significantly improve the results"
"personalized advertisement systems should not only collect… context-related attributes of the user (profile, history, social, time, location, connected devices, etc.) but also combine them with psychological factors that can positively affect the attitude towards ad acceptance"
In 2019, the UK data protection authority found that surveillance advertising is illegal at scale & millions are affected by GDPR violations myriads of companies commit every day. Now the regulator 'reinforces the need to address the concerns'. I mean #wtf ico.org.uk/media/about-th…
The 2019 report was very good, and today's 'opinion' once again contains a sharp analysis of massive non-compliance, which the ICO 'continues to see evidence of', including 'invalid consent', 'unlawful' data processing, and it's not even clear by whom.
But NOTHING happens!
"The Commissioner called for industry to make changes, but also recognised the need for a measured and considered approach due to… a commercially sensitive ecosystem"
Bullshit. The ICO undermines compliance, destroys trust into the GDPR and into information technology at large.
"Für FinTechs, InsurTechs, Plattformen, NeoBroker ... soll Deutschland einer der führenden Standorte … Es gilt, die mit den neuen Technologien, wie z. B. Blockchain, verbundenen Chancen zu nutzen" … "neue Dynamik … Finanzinnovationen, Kryptoassets und Geschäftsmodellen"
Puh.
Das Problem is nicht mal so sehr das sinnleere BS-Bingo, sondern dass hier ein breites Feld digitaler Geschäftsmodelle mit potenziell gewaltigen gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen ("Fintech", "Insurtech") zum Nebenschauplatz von mehr oder weniger zwielichtigem Trading-Zeug verkommt.
Wenn wir das, was aktuell unter "Fintech" und "Insurtech" gehandelt wird, nicht aktiv gesellschaftlich gestalten, bzw. wenn uns dazu nicht mehr einfällt als "wir brauchen eine neue Dynamik" und "effektive und zügige Genehmigungsverfahren", dann wird das ein Desaster mit Anlauf.