"Letter from a Birmingham Jail," Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., 1963:
"Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws." (1/9)
"One may well ask: 'How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?' The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws." (2/)
"One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that 'an unjust law is no law at all.'" (3/)
"Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law." (4/)
"To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust." (5/)
"All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority." (6/)
"Segregation, to use the terminology of the Jewish philosopher Martin Buber, substitutes an 'I-it' relationship for an 'I-thou' relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. Hence segregation...is morally wrong and sinful." (7/)
"Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Is not segregation an existential expression of man's tragic separation, his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness?" (8/)
"Thus it is that I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court, for it is morally right; and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances, for they are morally wrong." (9/9)
#mlk #MLKDay
Postscript: For more about the natural law so eloquently invoked by Dr. King, see this article: catholic.com/magazine/print…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Catholic Answers

Catholic Answers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @catholiccom

Jan 19
"If God has a plan, prayer is pointless."

This is true if our prayer is an attempt to make God change his mind or his will. That's contrary to sound philosophy and biblical faith: “I the Lord do not change” (Mal 3:6). So what IS the goal of intercessory prayer?🧵
A correct understanding of the nature of prayer teaches us that prayer does not change God’s will but accomplishes it. We might say that prayer attempts to fulfill the conditions of God’s will by which he has ordained that certain goods be given to us.
God has ordained that certain goods be granted on the condition that we pray. And so it's truly the case that if we don't pray, those goods won't be given. Nevertheless, this does not mean that prayer changes God’s mind or will.
Read 12 tweets
Jul 20, 2021
Has Pope Francis banned the traditional Latin Mass? Is there still an option for those who prefer the pre-Vatican-II liturgy? What informed the Pope's decision? Here's our overview of Traditionis Custodes and its immediate impact: catholic.com/magazine/onlin…
Under the provisions of Benedict XVI’s 2007 document Summorum Pontificum, the individual priest was the primary decision-maker concerning when Mass would be celebrated according to the older form. Under the new document, the bishop has this responsibility.
Although there are not as many opportunities to celebrate the traditional liturgy as when every individual priest could decide to perform it, there is no sudden end to its celebration.
Read 10 tweets
Jul 19, 2021
There is better historical evidence for the existence of Jesus Christ than there is for Plato, Julius Caesar, and Alexander the Great. If you doubt the existence of Jesus because "the New Testament was written decades after he existed," you also have to doubt the other three.
The best biographical source for Plato comes from Diogenes Laërtius' "Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers," written over 500 years after Plato’s death. The oldest extant copy dates from the late 11th century. Historians consider it a crucial source of history.
As for Julius Caesar: Two of the most important historical documents telling us about his life come from Suetonius and Plutarch, both of which were written more than 100 years after his death in 44 B.C. But the extant copies possessed today are even farther removed.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 5, 2021
"Easter is a pagan holiday. Its timing is based on the full moon and the spring equinox, and it’s named after the goddess Ishtar."

No matter how widespread this claim has become, it has no basis in history or reality. (THREAD) (1/10)
The word Easter is of English origin. Ishtar was worshipped in Mesopotamia (modern Iraq), not England, which is thousands of miles away. Despite sounding similar, the two words are unrelated. (2/)
This theory was based on an incorrect conclusion by St. Bede the Venerable about the etymological origins of the English month that coincides with spring and the celebration of Easter, Eosturmonath. (3/)
Read 11 tweets
Feb 18, 2021
Okay, in this thread we are posting early Church sources against abortion (A.D. 400 or earlier)👇
The Didache (A.D. 70)
The Letter of Barnabas (A.D. 74)
Read 16 tweets
Feb 1, 2021
The Contingency Argument for God's existence, in simple language (thread):

When we look at the world around us, we see many things that change. For example, at one time a man may be standing, but at another time he may be sitting. Yet he is the same man. (1/)
Philosophers express this fact by saying that the man's posture is contingent, i.e. that it could be different than it is. Humans are contingent beings because they could be different than they are at any given moment. The same is true of everything we see in the universe. (2/)
Living things like people, animals, and plants all grow and develop. Inanimate things like your car, phone, or computer may be turned on or off. Even rocks and gems can be cut, polished, or moved from one place to another. (3/)
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(