#SupremeCourt to hear plea filed by Bhartiya Janta Party MLA's challenging the resolution passed by the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly suspending the BJP MLA's for a period of one year over alleged misbehavior with the presiding officer.
Sr ADV C Aryama Sundaram submitted that "How far a judicial review can be applied for the quantum of the punishment."
Justice AM Khanwilkar- there is no question of judicial review, there is a limit given.
Anything beyond that would be unconstitutional.
J Khanwilkar- If the legislature was to provide beyond this period, would it not hit the Act made by parliament or the constitution. #BJP #maharashtraassembly
J Khanwilkar- I would invite your attention to para 29 of the Sharma's Judgment, because one this statement is given effect to then the argument of it being statutory doesn't matter. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
J Khanwilkar- we don't have to go into the debate of whether it is statutory or not.
Sundaram- The rules are the procedure, the speaker cannot go beyond 53 that is obvious.
J Khanwilkar- Substantive matter is not procedure, substantive matter is how much punishment can be given.
Sundaram- Rules are not concerned with the powers of the legislature, rules are concerned about the previlage committee. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
J Khanwilkar- There is no absolute power, it is bound by the constitution and the law made by parliament. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
Sundaram- Rules are not made by parliament.
194 will not apply unless I can show your Lordships. The substance would have been if the speaker would have acted but here the legislative assembly acted. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
Sundaram- The point that I would like to mention is the power....Milords I was shocked that there have been several suspensions from the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
J Khanwilkar- because that has not been tested, ultimately it is the Supreme Court which is Supreme to interpret the Constitution. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
Sundaram- The power of suspension has to follow if it is given
J Khanwilkar- The argument that you are making was considered in Bolton's case in 1986 and was rejected.
J Khanwilkar- The point when you say it has to be rational, it has to be in proportion. Anything beyond would be irrational. This specific issue has never arisen before.
Sundaram- That is why Mr Dave was suggesting to transfer this to Constitution bench. #maharashtraassembly
J Khanwilkar- It's not like that every case where constitution is being discussed goes to Constitutional bench. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
J Khanwilkar- The citizen cannot put forward the argument that they are unrepresented because of the act of their member. But they can certainly say that when his duly elected member is not disqualified but not allowed to sit beyond a period of 6 months. #maharashtraassembly#BJP
Sundaram- If the conduct lowers the dignity of the house then it's not that he may be removed for a session, he may be suspended. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
Justice Dinesh Maharashtra- Finally this doesn't bar a member to be re elected, but your action to bar for a year....
J Khanwilkar- Your decision of 1 year becomes irrational, the statutory provision..151 when seat become vacant election must be conducted. #BJP
Sundaram- not in all cases.
J Khanwilkar- That is the rule...
J CT Ravikumar- If one is suspended then election is not conducted, but when one is expelled then the election commission comes into play and people are represented. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
J Ravikumar- But if someone is suspended for 1 year or two years what would be the fate of our democracy.
J Khanwilkar- This is all interconnected, it is about democratic value, it's not about the rights of one individual. If we uphold this, there can be other situation we can't visualise. Legislature doesn't not have untravelled power. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
Sundaram- Referring to Judgments.
J Khanwilkar- all this is in connection with suspension.
Sundaram- Is it only a remedial power and if it is limited remedy, does that become irrational? This is what I referring. #maharashtraassembly #BJP
J Khanwilkar- The essential is to control the dignity of the assembly for the day or for the session, once the session is over it cannot be indefinite.
Sundara-lm- We'll go back to proportionality, the power of the legislature to suspend a member is available and that power itself not be open to judicial review. #MaharashtraAssembly #BJP
Sundaram- If I have the power to punish, the constitution and the legislature defines what the punishment would be it is the power of the assembly to decide. #MaharashtraAssembly #BJP
Sundaram- In Raja Rampal case, you cannot say that the constituency is affected and that is why you cannot do this. He is still the representative of the constituency but the bar is to participate in house. #MaharashtraAssembly #BJP
J Khanwilkar- Suppose in the last session the parliament or assembly says expelled for 2 years?
Sundaram- No Milords it cannot be done.
J Khanwilkar- If not in this case than in same way how can a suspension go beyond a session.
J Khanwilkar- The constituency can not be left unrepresented for such a long time, that is the point that we want to deal with, we have no direct judgment except Balton.
Sundaram- Judicial review arises in various activities, judicial review of judicial order, of administration action, legislation I'm each of which the scope of judicial review is different. #MaharashtraAssembly #BJP
Sundaram- I'm bringing up which is different from all these the Lordships are taking a statute when we are testing the judicial review in here is a unique situation, its a judicial review of whether the members of legislative has performed their duty or not. #MaharashtraAssembly
J Khanwilkar- That is for the court to decide whether something is just or unjust, legislative cannot decide that.
Just In:
[Lakhimpur Kheri Violence case] Final arguments concluded on Ashish Mishra's bail plea in Allahabad High Court today. #lakhimpurkheri
Mishra's counsel argued that Mishra was not driving the Thar which had allegedly killed protestors and he was only seen running away from crime scene.
"There is no evidence on record to impose any criminal liability on my client, he is being connected unnecessarily," he said.
One correction application was filed at the last moment. Though Mishra's counsel argued that as the court had decided to reserve the order before it, let separate orders be passed.
However, court allowed the application and directed the main bail plea to be corrected by tonight.
#SupremeCourt hearing plea seeking traditional cremation for members of the parsi community who succumbed to #COVID19.
J Chandrachud- What happened in this matter?
SG Tushar Mehta- We have filed our affidavit, this may not be allowed scientifically.
Sr ADV Fali S Nariman appearing for petitioner submits that we have mentioned their own rules, it can bee considered keeping that in view, some decent burial of bodies.
SG Mehta- I'm not adversarial at all, we'll consider.
J Chandrachud suggests to convene a meeting and decide.
Nariman- We'll get in touch with SG whenever he is available we'll sit together and decide.
SG Mehta- we'll convene whenever Mr Nariman is available it has to be that way.
Does the exception to Section 375 of Indian Penal Code discriminate against married women?
Delhi High Court to hear plea(s) challenging the constitutionality of the exception viz. Marital Rape. #Maritallaws#maritalrape
Union seeks some time to work out a consultative process, Judge says it would like to hear the case.
Union then says a comprehensive re-look is required in the case and it should not be half-hearted. #maritalrape
I suggest let the amicus make submissions, it would equip the Union too: Union (SG Tushar Mehta)
Judge says let the amcus finish. “These counsel are busy counsel!”
Adv Sachin Patil for Maharashtra informed that our work is in progress. We have identified around 3000 children, we are making all our honest effort, whereas, the data on the portal is not real time data. #COVID19