THREAD: Could the current energy crisis be even worse than the 1970s oil price shock? Given the legendary status of that event it might seem like a preposterous question. But we’ve crunched the numbers on this and they’re not pretty…
Before we get to the data it’s perhaps worth splitting up the 1970s comparison into two parts: first, the financial impact on households.
Second, the impact on the wider economy: shutdowns, three days weeks and so on. Let’s deal with household finances first.
It so happens the UK has an excellent set of statistics on what the “average” household spends its money on each year. £588 a week Everything from restaurants, culture, food/drink, mortgage payments, council tax, income tax and, of course energy bills: a quick guided tour here:
Now that energy bill slice may not look big but bear in mind if it goes up to £2k this spring that's up from £25 a week to £38 a week.
If, as is plausible given where wholesale prices are, the formula puts it at £2.4k in autumn, that's £46.
If u assume other spending rises in line with nominal GDP (I've used OBR forecasts) then that £38 a week would equate to 5.6% of total spending.
That £46 (in the event of the price cap going all the way to £2.4k) would be 6.8% of total spending.
How high is that vs history?
Happily we have a LONG run of data on this. Not all of it is on the @ONS website but I've managed to get hold of family spending numbers going back to 1970.
Look at spending on domestic energy up til recently: rises quite high in the 70s and 80s. Drops lower in the 90s/2000s
Now let's add on the numbers if the price cap goes up to £2,000. The proportion of household spending going on heat/power is suddenly up to the highest since the late 1980s, 1987 to be precise.
If the price cap were to rise to £2.4k later this year then the proportion UK households spend on heat and power would be the highest ON RECORD. Higher even than the 1970s. So it's not preposterous to compare this: in many ways the domestic impact could be worse than the 70s
How "unprecedented" are these numbers? Not 100% sure. In general energy prices came down quite a lot in the 1950s and 1960s.
Then again, I've seen some papers suggesting that even in the 1930s the avg amount people paid for energy was well below this: jstor.org/stable/23015065
Of course, there's no such thing as an "average" household, and the impact will be far greater on low income households for whom energy already constituted a bigger share. So while the top tenth may see bills up from c.3% of total to 4%, for the bottom 10% it's up to 13% or more
Now, as we established above, the 70s crisis wasn't just about domestic bills. In many senses it was about the nature of industry: factories were shuttered, power was rationed, 3 day week etc. Could that happen again?
This seems less likely, but not for an altogether encouraging reason. The key is this chart. Back in the 60s and 70s, more than 40% of people worked in the energy/manufacturing sectors. They were at the core of the economy so everyone NOTICED if they were curtailed...
Roll on to the 2000s and barely a tenth of people work in the kinds of sectors which have high energy usage and might therefore be curtailed. Even if there are shutdowns they're unlikely to have the same cultural impact as back in the 1970s
This doesn't mean there won't be an industrial impact. But in the same way as we've offshored our manufacturing the industrial energy impact is offshored too.
Factories in China are already shutting down (part Covid, part energy).
Which portends more supply chain problems ahead
Consider that this is all coming at the same time as payroll taxes and interest rates are going up. And the @bankofengland is raising interest rates too. All told, discretionary items accounting for nearly 40% of household spending (the red bits) are on the way up. Big squeeze.
Full news story: families facing the biggest energy squeeze on record as prices begin to bite news.sky.com/story/energy-c…
Here, in video form, is my analysis on the impact higher energy prices could have on household bills in the coming months. In short: this could be an even worse squeeze than following the famous energy crises in 70s/80s. Produced by @aoifeyourell
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: UK benchmark inflation rate rises to highest level since 1992. Consumer Prices Index hit 5.4% in Dec, up from 5.1% in Nov and way above @bankofengland 2% target ons.gov.uk/economy/inflat…
Two questions: first, how high will CPI get in the coming months? @bankofengland said 6% but many economists think 7%.
Second, how soon does BoE raise int rates again? Could be as soon as next meeting in Feb (prob up from 0.25% to 0.5% so still v v low by historical standards)
The point here (and this can't be emphasised enough) is that this 30yr high in inflation is happening BEFORE the impact of a record increase in energy bills which, as I ran through in this thread last night, will squeeze households even further
Back in 2014 the UK population was projected to be closing in on 75m by 2040.
Latest projections, released today, suggest we’ll have barely more than 70m people by then.
This is a big change.
Some will argue it’s good news. Others bad.
Either way, it’s enormously consequential.
According to the latest official population projections, the UK’s total fertility rate is now 1.59 (long term average of children per woman).
Down from 1.78 in 2018. BIG drop taking it down from comfortably above the OECD avg to below it (tho OECD avg will prob also fall too).
Blimey.
While overall UK population is projected to rise for the foreseeable future, @ONS projections say the Scottish population has now nearly peaked and will be falling quite rapidly by the middle of the century.
Whether this turns out to be right or not, it’s quite a chart.
How many people have died in this country since the beginning of the pandemic?
How does the toll compare with history?
And was 2021 any “better” for mortality than 2020?
Now that we have nearly all the data from 2021 it’s time for an update🧵
Let’s begin with the official death toll, as portrayed on the @UKHSAgov.uk dashboard.
This recently passed 150k and while the numbers are much lower day-by-day than in previous periods, the seven day avg hasn’t dropped below 100 since August. Ugh
But the official toll (150k) is not the only one.
There’s also the ONS toll, based on the no of death certificates where Covid is mentioned: 175k
This overstates it since 10%ish are primarily from other causes.
Then there’s excess deaths (deaths from all causes vs 5yr avg): 151k
It is the great paradox of addressing climate change: in order to go green we may have to do MORE dirty things: burning fossil fuels, digging stuff out of the ground.
The thing we want to escape is the very thing we need to help us escape.
We are not talking enough about this! 🧵
Let’s start by pondering a couple of recent contentious decisions: the first was the decision to shelve the Cambo oilfield in the Shetlands. Shell recently pulled out. The project may not go ahead reuters.com/business/energ…
There are engineering reasons why Cambo might not have made sense: it’s quite distant/deep and the crude is quite “heavy” meaning you need to heat it, and hence expend a lot of energy/carbon to get it to shore. But there was also much political opposition huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/everythi…
When omicron appeared we knew v little save for some of its genomic features and fact that it was spreading fast in S Africa.
Ensuing weeks have been unsettling because the virus has spread faster than our ability to understand key features - eg virility & vaccine resistance
Up until quite recently there has been a consistent message from public health officials:
a) we know boosters work. So much so that, says @SajidJavid, 3x doses will soon be considered a "full course" eg not two
b) there's "no evidence" omicron is necessarily milder/less virulent
A quick tour through the Covid data as of the latest number. Slightly more bad news than good, but that doesn’t mean there’s no good. Let’s start with the overall UK picture. That 106k number a new daily record. And possibly not the last.
The good news is that for the time being the divergence between cases and admissions remains evident for the UK as a whole. Look at the red line vs the black line and look how different that relationship was last winter (eg before vaccines). Amazing really…
But you get a better sense of what’s going on by looking not at UK but at London, where most case growth is. This chart (hat-tip to @PaulMainwood for the concept) shows where we are vs the winter wave. On bright side, the blue/red lines aren’t going up in lockstep with cases.