Millions of litres of intravenous fluids are administered around the world every day. For patients who are acutely ill, small differences in mortality attributable to fluid choice would have profound global public health importance
We included 5037 patients from 53 ICUs in Australia & New Zealand. The primary end point was 90 day mortality. Day 90 mortality was 21.8% and 22% for balanced crystalloid and saline respectively (P=0.90).
The proportion of patients treated with new RRT was similar by treatment group (12.7% and 12.9% for balanced crystalloid & saline patients respectively.)
Our study participants received study fluids for longer & in greater volume than earlier trials. We achieved separation in key biochemical parameters that are hypothesized to mediate the adverse effects of saline.
While the study was stopped before reaching the intended recruitment target, we crossed a conservative stopping boundary that means it is extremely unlikely we would have observed a mortality effect of the size we had hypothesised if we had completed the trial.
We included 11 studies and 2 conference abstracts for a total of 35,884 trial participants. We adjudicated six studies with 34,450 participants as having a low risk of bias in all domains
Here is the summary of trials with low risk of bias:
A Bayesian meta-analysis for the low-risk-of-bias studies indicates an 89.5% probability that on average balanced crystalloids are associated with lower mortality compared with saline.
Given that balanced crystalloids and saline are widely available, and clinicians regularly need to choose between them, this analysis has important implications for practice
Balanced crystalloids are probably the best choice for fluid resuscitation in most critically ill patients
There is an important caveat because data suggest the possibility of harm with balanced crystalloids in patients with traumatic brain injury. Whether this risk extends to patients with other acute brain pathologies is unclear.
A patient-level meta-analysis should allow further evaluation of potential differential treatment effects in subpopulations (including patients with brain injuries). However, for now, balanced crystalloids are the logical choice for acutely ill adults without TBI.
I am pleased & proud to see the #PLUStrial published in @NEJM today. It is my 10th @NEJM paper! Here’s my list of @NEJM papers and what I think they mean for clinical practice
#1: The #HEATtrial (Dec 2015) showed that using paracetamol to treat fever in ICU patients with suspected infections did not affect the number of ICU-free days. Mortality rates were similar in paracetamol & placebo-treated patients: nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
These data provide reassurance that if paracetamol is administered to treat fever in the setting of an infection or given for another reason to a patient who happens to have fever & infection, such as for analgesia, harm is unlikely to result.
We conducted an international, randomized, open-label, cluster crossover, registry-embedded trial to compare strategies of stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated adults implemented at the level of the ICU jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality up to 90 days. Secondary outcomes were clinically significant upper GI bleeding, C. difficile infection, ICU and hospital length of stay.
Results of the #TARGETtrial, the largest critical care nutrition trial ever undertaken, are now online @NEJM nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
What we did, what we found, and what it means follows…
Please RT to help translate this new knowledge.
Thanks to funding from @HRCNewZealand & @NHMRC we randomised 4000 participants from 46 Australian and New Zealand ICUs in less than a year and a half!
Adults mechanically ventilated & expected to require enteral nutrition in ICU beyond the calendar day after randomisation were assigned to energy dense enteral nutrition (1.5kcal/mL) or standard care enteral nutrition (1.0kcal/mL) at a dose of 1mL/kg/hr based on ideal body weight