On Jan 14, protests against a proposed steel plant in Odisha turned violent. About 1,000 protestors were lathicharged in #Dhinkia village, injuring at least 30. But this isn’t the first time they have faced police action. A thread on what led to the violent incident 1/12
Village residents who had gathered to inspect their betel leaf plantations – their main source of livelihood – were stopped by the police. A steel plant by Jindal Steel Works (JSW) is proposed where these plantations currently stand 2/12
The police have reportedly blocked public access to the plantations since Dec 2021 and when people protested, the police allegedly resorted to force, beating up even women and children. They arrested members and the leader of the Jindal Pratirodh Sangram Samiti (JPSS) 3/12
Dhinkia residents have been opposing the #JSWsteel plant since it received forest clearance in May 2011 and are determined to not give up their land for any project. We have tracked the conflict in detail: landconflictwatch.org/conflicts/posc… 4/12
A public hearing held on Dec 20, 2019 was called a ‘farce’ as many of the project-affected village residents did not participate in the meeting. The Dhinkia palli sabha (village council) also passed a resolution against the project that year 5/12
The project, however, is yet to receive an environmental clearance from the @moefcc. The JPSS claims that the Odisha government has gone ahead without the clearance to “cut trees, destroy plantations and acquire land” 6/12
Meanwhile, individual and community forest rights claims filed by the people have been pending for over 12 years, despite the govt setting up three committees to look into the implementation of forest rights under the @ForestRightsAct 7/12
Multiple human rights violations have been reported as well. In the past, the police have arrested protesters on fake charges and reportedly resorted to violence 3-4 times since Dec 2021. Many people have been forced into hiding to prevent these arrests 8/12
The JPSS has reached out to civil society groups and political parties for support. It has also petitioned the Odisha Human Rights Commission to visit the site and conduct a high-level inquiry into the #humanrights violations 9/12
On Jan 16, representatives of civil society organisations wrote a letter to CM @Naveen_Odisha, highlighting the ‘ongoing crackdown’ and calling for ‘urgent intervention’ 10/12
The JSW project isn’t the first struggle of the Dhinkia residents. Earlier, they had strongly objected to the steel project by South Korean company, POSCO, which required 4,000 acres of land. Fearing displacement and loss of livelihood, the people opposed it for 12 years 11/12
Following the stiff resistance and failing to get an environmental clearance, POSCO was forced to withdraw the project in 2016. Will JSW’s steel plant project meet the same fate? 12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Land Conflict Watch

Land Conflict Watch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LandConflicts

Feb 9, 2021
Several infrastructure and tourism projects have come up in the fragile Himalayas, drawing concerns from locals and environmentalists. In the wake of the #UttarakhandDisaster here are some land conflicts from our database. 1/9
The Vishnuprayag Hydro-electric Project in Chamoli, which was damaged on Sunday during the disaster, has faced severe opposition from locals who are still fighting to safeguard van panchayat rights over common land. 2/9 landconflictwatch.org/conflicts/peop…
In 2020, the centre allowed resorts and commercial buildings to come up in the eco-sensitive Bhagirathi river valley in #Uttarakhand. These made the region vulnerable to disasters, experts say. 3/9
landconflictwatch.org/conflicts/eco-…
Read 9 tweets
Oct 22, 2019
Thread: The Centre introduced a new land acquisition law in 2013 to protect the rights of land owners. But three states—K'taka, Maharashtra & TN—continued to use archaic state laws to acquire land for high-profile projects. How did they do this? Read on. (1/16)
In 2013, the Congress-led UPA government introduced the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (LARR) Act. The Act provides better compensation to land owners and makes it mandatory to seek their consent before acquiring their land. (2/16)
Land acquisition is a ‘Concurrent List’ subject under the Constitution, which means both the Centre and states can pass their own laws. However, all state laws on land acquisition became null and void the moment the LARR Act was passed. (3/16)
Read 16 tweets
Sep 13, 2019
#Thread: Thousands of families in MP fear submergence of their homes after the Centre has forced the filling up of the Sardar Sarovar Dam to its full capacity. The Centre was aware of families living in the submergence area. Some pictures to show the ground reality. 1/9
Since 2014, the Centre has claimed that all families in the submergence zone have been rehabilitated. However, a letter from the chief secretary of Madhya Pradesh to the Narmada Control Authority in May 2019 said that at least 6k families still live in the submergence area. 2/9
The Centre ignored this & approved the Gujarat govt’s request to fill the dam to test its capacity. As the dam started to fill up and flood villages, the MP govt set up camps to assess the no. of people awaiting rehabilitation while the local authorities evacuated the people. 3/9
Read 10 tweets
Aug 16, 2019
The repeal of Art 35A on August 5 has scrapped special land rights granted to the residents of Jammu & #Kashmir. Here’s a thread on some other legal provisions to protect ‘original’ citizens’ rights over land in the rest of India and how these provisions are under attack. 1/17
Article 35A, a by-product of Article 370 that gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, stated that permanent residents of the state would be conferred with special rights over the acquisition of immovable property in the state. 2/17
On August 5, 2019, Article 35A of the Constitution was abrogated on the grounds of it being “discriminatory against non-permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir” and to “enable economic development” in the area. Now, non-residents have access to land and property in J&K. 3/17
Read 17 tweets
Feb 21, 2019
This is a thread on what rejection of #forestrightsact claims means on the ground, based on our data documentation. Feel free to use it, get in touch for more info. 1/9
The Supreme Court, on February 13, 2019, had ordered the forced eviction of more than 1,000,000 tribal and other forest-dwelling households from forestlands. 2/9
The court has asked state governments to carry out evictions where claims of Forest Rights Act have been rejected. 3/9
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(