Helen Redmond Profile picture
Jan 19 12 tweets 3 min read
A 🧵on dual use. What is "dual use?" When it comes to quitting combustible tobacco - cigarettes - a person continues to smoke but ALSO vapes. We see dual use with people who take methadone or buprenorphine & continue to use illicit opioids (use on top)
But dual use is also seen in other attempts at behavior change. Ever try to eat more healthy? You eat brown rice but still go to Burger King on the regular. You get double cheese burgers with bacon, DON'T hold the🍟! But you like brown rice, too
What's going on? Change takes time especially for smokers who have engaged in the behavior for decades. 🚬are old, familiar friends. It's hard for some smokers to make the switch to vaping on the first, second or third try. For a period of time there will be dual use. So what?
In harm reduction we say "Any Positive Change." That a person is trying to switch to a safer nicotine product but hasn't been 💯 percent successful yet is still a very positive change. It takes time. Again, the burger & brown rice
And there is often the issue of ambivalence. The notion that I want to stop smoking and switch but I don't. Ambivalence is normal, we all experience it when attempting behavior change.
Add to the mix the Stages of Change. The reality is some people are not ready, willing or able to stop smoking & switch, they are in the stage of precontemplation. That's okay according to the 2 dope kings, James Prochaska & Carlo DiClemente
This is REAL & we all go thru these stages, some faster than others. We all know someone who made the switch in days, months or years.
There are also structural drivers that impact the ability to make change easier or more difficult: race, class, mental health & socioeconomic status, housing instability, social/familial support, health insurance, employment, disability, etc.
In the vaping/nicotine wars, tobacco controllers and vape haters are increasingly seizing on "dual use" to argue that vapes are not effective, that people keep smoking & they cannot switch. Interestingly they don't say this about people who use the patch but continue to 🚬
In fact, smoking cigarettes & continuing to use the patch are recommended. This promoting of "dual use" as a problem when it comes to vaping is hypocritical. Public health agencies should support smokers switching to a clearly safer nicotine product no matter how long it takes
BECAUSE: E-cigarettes were more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine-replacement therapy, when both products were accompanied by behavioral support nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Tobacco harm reductionist have patience & empathy for dual users: the burger 🍔 & brown🍚We support smokers trying to make the switch to ANY safer nicotine product. ANY POSITIVE CHANGE!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Helen Redmond

Helen Redmond Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aftariak

Mar 2, 2020
Yo @ben_stockton in your piece on IQOS, Professor Johanna Cohen is described as the "director of the Institute for Global Tobacco Control at John Hopkins University."
You neglect to mention that Dr. Cohen is "Bloomberg Professor of Disease Prevention at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health." That is how she is described on the Hopkins website. Why leave out the Bloomberg designations? #justsaying
You have this disclaimer in the piece: "The Bureau’s Smoke Screen project, scrutinizing the tobacco industry which kills millions a year, is funded by an NGO, Vital Strategies, which is in turn funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies."
Read 8 tweets
Nov 5, 2019
There is no group of people that public health has stigmatized more than smokers. For decades they have produced materials that shame & blame smokers, tell them they are stupid, are going to die painful deaths, it's their fault they got cancer. It is astonishing.
Here is a video from the DYSDOH "Cigarettes are eating you alive." From the CDC youtube.com/user/NYSDOH Another from the CDC They are lurid, disrespectful, sickening.
Public health promotes and supports graphic, disgusting, vomitous photos on cigarette packages that show a profound lack of empathy for smokers. And the stomach-turning photos don't convince smokers to quit!
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(