The Yamato class are best remembered for their massive guns and thick armor. Speed is the last thing on anyone's mind when discussing these dreadnoughts.
However, Japanese designers put considerable thought into the speed of the class.
The most famous feature was the bulbous bow.
Contrary to popular belief, the bulbous bow was not a Japanese invention. However, they did introduce what was the most radical design yet, one that offered superior performance to her contemporaries.
The effect on performance was significant. At top speed, the bulbous bow reduced the amount of power needed by about 8% or 12,000 shp. Meaning that without the Bow, the Yamato class would need roughly 162,000shp to reach her maximum speed.
The Yamato hull was also highly optimized for speed.
Japan conducted extensive testing on various hull designs. These tests involved everything from tank models to full size tests using the then demilitilarized Hiei.
The result was the interesting coke bottle hull shape.
Despite the wide beam of 128' (38.9m), the hull form allowed water to easily move around the hulll.
This reduced the amount of power needed to push so much ship through the water.
Even the stern was optimized for efficiency. The hull gradually tapered towards the stern before suddenly ending in an almost miniature transom stern. This was also heavily tested and based on full scale trials.
(Credit to Yamato Museum)
Even the rudder design was chosen in the bid for performance.
Japanese designers opted for twin rudders in an inline arrangement (A trick used by other navies as well) to help reduce water resistance.
(Ditto)
The result of all this development was an impressive top speed exceeding 27 knots. This was equal to or just under that achieved by all of her contemporaries at the time of her entry into service. Impressive considering Yamato displaced about 30k tons more.
Sadly, due to the destruction of records. We won't know exactly how fast the class could reach. By forcing the engines, she might have picked up an extra knot or two of top speed.
Still, let it be said that the Yamato class was a masterpiece of Japanese naval design. Truly no expense or effort was spared to squeeze every drop of performance from the hull.
So let's assume that the US Navy did produce it's Lexington class battlecruisers in their original configuration.
How might they have influenced the US Navy during the interwar years and into World War 2?
There likely would have been no Alaska class cruisers for one.
With six large capital ships to patrol the sea lanes, there would be less impetus for the development of the large cruiser proposals in the 1930s.
As a side note, this might have even caused Germany to hesitate on the Deutschland class.
The Renown class/HMS Hood were known to be the major threats to the class due to their speed and power. Having the threat of the Lexington class in the Atlantic would be added to this.
On the post about the Yamato class and torpedoes, someone had pointed out that they always seemed to take on roughly 3,000 tons of flooding after they were initially torpedoed by aircraft or submarines.
Perfect because I wanted to talk about a design flaw in the Yamato design.
Japanese designers went above and beyond in the design of the Yamato class, stretching their capabilities to the limit to produce a very advanced warship.
Notably, the Yamato class used plenty of full scale testing in its design. This was especially true for the armor design.
Gunnery tests against Tosa showed that large calibre shells retained enough momentum to travel for some distance underwater, allowing them to bypass the main armor belt entirely by going under it.
If you think Bismarck supporters are crazy with the "It took an entire British fleet to sink it", Let me introduce you to the Japanese equivalent when discussing the Yamato class.
This picture is tossed around way more than it should, being inaccurate and without proper context
The problem I have with this picture, and the loss of the Yamato class for that matter, is that people don't understand the progression of damage.
They almost seem to assume that the ship's were perfectly fine until that final hit that sent them under.
The fact of the matter is that US Navy aircraft continued hitting the battleships long after they were done and sinking. Some of those bombs and torpedoes were gratuitous at best.
Instead, the proper question is what straw was it that broke the camel's back?
In turns of protection, tumblehome was also effective in countering gunfire at close ranges (approaching horizontally). So much so that the US Navy designed a battleship that returned to a tumblehome hull reminiscent of a civil war ironclad.
However, gunnery ranges ultimately increased so that shells approached at steeper angles. Here, they negated the slope of tumblehome hulls.
This meant that armor that inclined outwards was superior.
The unsung heroes among the United States cruisers during the Second World War were the Brooklyn class light cruisers.
The impact of these cruisers extends far beyond their service. Their very design influenced all future cruisers of the US Navy.
The Brooklyn class cruiser introduced the long flushdeck style hull (increasing structural strength and stiffness) that would be used on future heavy and light cruisers.
The safer location of the stern was chosen to carry aircraft and their equipment (rather than amidships).
Other features were also introduced for cruiser designs. The propulsion system was arranged into the unit system. The final two ships of the class would even introduce the 5"/38 guns in twin mounts.