"Certainly I said that the present government is a tyrant. What else could I say? If I am convinced that this government is evil I cannot pray for its long life. . . .
(1/n).
Whatever attractive things may be done for those in bondage, slavery is after all slavery. I deem it my national, religious and human duty to liberate my country and my people from servitude.
(2/n).
The present government is a negation of the wish and will of millions of people. It justifies the barbarous general massacre of Jallianwalla Bagh. It does not consider it unjust that people should be made to crawl upon their bellies like beasts. . . .
(3/n) .
It does not desist from riding rough-shod over the Islamic Caliphate despite the persistent pleadings of 300 million human beings.
There is no city where I have not reiterated all the statements included in the two speeches filed against me.
(4/n).
. In fact I must admit that the previous speeches were even more definite, clear and categorical. In the speeches filed against me I had declared that the seed of freedom can never be nurtured until it is watered by violence and repression.
(5/n).
And the government has started watering it.When I ponder on the great and significant history of the convicts’ dock and find that the honour of standing in that place belongs to me today, my soul becomes steeped in thankfulness and praise of God."___ Maulana Abul Kalam Azad.
n/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Moghul kings to unify the country and usher in a new era of all-round progress. During the sixteenth and seventeenth century under the rule of the Moghul emperors, India once again reached the pinnacle of progress and prosperity.
(1/n).
The greatest of them was Akbar, who ruled in the latter half of the sixteenth century.
(2/n).
The great merit of Akbar was not only the political unification of the country, but what was perhaps more important, the working out of a new cultural synthesis — in order to reconcile the new stream of culture with the old — and evolve a new culture.
"Some people ask me why I am now praising Subhas Bose when I had opposed him while he was in India. I want to give a frank reply to this question. Subhas Bose and I were co-workers in the struggle for freedom for 25 years. He was younger to me by two or four years. .
(1/n).
Our relations with each other were marked by great affection. I used to treat him as my younger brother. It is an open secret that at times there were differences between us on political questions.
(2/n).
But I never for a moment doubted that he was a brave soldier in the struggle for freedom.I do not expect that there would be unanimity on every issue when we have achieved freedom. There will be always differences in the outlook of the people who belong to a healthy race.
(3/n).
"If the Hindu tyrannize over the Muslims, with what face will they talk of a World Federation? Those Hindus who, like, Dr Moonje and Shri #Savarkar, believe in the doctrine of the sword may seek to keep the Muslims under the Hindu domination. (1/n).
I do not represent that section. I represent the Congress".(2/n)___ Mahatma Gandhi on VD #Savarkar.
"Strange as it may appear, Mr. #Savarkar and Mr. Jinnah, instead of being opposed to each other on the one nation versus two nations issue, are in complete agreement about it. Both agree, not only agree but insist, that there are two nations in India (3/n).