7/ None of these security breaches happened in Parliament. All happened in the government.
In fact, when the CRA breach occurred, Parliament IT sent an email saying Parliament’s systems were secure & unaffected b/c they’re architected differently from gov’t systems.
9/ It’s the government that undermined national security by allowing Chinese military scientist Feihu Yan of the People's Liberation Army's Academy of Military Medical Science access to work in the lab - not Parliament.
10/ Other gov’ts have had national security breaches, but none as egregious as:
- allowing a Chinese military scientist access to a top gov’t lab handling the world’s deadliest viruses & then
- allowing that research to be transferred to China.
12/ These breaches will continue until Parliament asserts itself & holds the government accountable for its national security and intelligence activities - by establishing a committee of Parliament that has access to highly classified national security documents.
15/ While there is the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), despite its name, it’s not a committee of Parliament but a committee of the PMO. It’s the fox in charge of the henhouse.
17/ The ISC consists of 9 members appointed by Parliament. The chair is elected by its members. The members are subject to Section 1(1)(b) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 and are routinely given access to highly classified material in carrying out their duties.
18/ The US Congress has committees in both the House of Representatives and the Senate that oversee US government national security and intelligence activities, committees which have access to highly classified documents.
19/ Last spring, the PM used NSICOP as an excuse not to handover the Winnipeg lab docs as ordered by Parliament.
In doing so, he confirmed our worst fears about the committee being used as a Potemkin village to shield the gov’t from real accountability & oversight.
20/ That’s why Conservatives are boycotting NSICOP until a bill is introduced to reform the committee into a committee of Parliament, with the full powers that committees in other democracies have to oversee the government’s national security & intelligence activities.
21/ That’s also why Conservatives continue to pursue the government to handover the Winnipeg lab documents to Parliament, not some ad hoc committee outside Parliament.
2/ “Nearly every SARS case since the original epidemic has been due to lab leaks — six incidents in three countries, including twice in a single month from a lab in Beijing. In one instance, the mother of a lab worker died.”
3/ “In 2007, foot-and-mouth disease, which can devastate livestock and caused a massive crisis in Britain in 2001, escaped from a drainage pipe leak at an English lab with the highest biosafety rating, BSL-4.”
1/ The House of Commons and its committee ordered the Trudeau government, four separate times, to hand over documents related to breaches at its Winnipeg lab.
These orders come from powers granted to the House of Commons under Section 18 of the Constitution Act, 1867.
2/ On June 16th, House of Commons Speaker Anthony Rota ruled on this matter.
His ruling made clear that Section 18 of the Constitution Act, 1867 gives the House of Commons the power to order the government to hand over the Winnipeg lab docs.
3/ The government has disobeyed these four orders, and is now going to extraordinary lengths to cover things up by going to the Federal Court to prevent the release of the documents.
Here's why the Prime Minister is wrong when he says the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) is the right place to review the breaches of national security at the government's National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg.
2/ NSICOP was created by Bill C-22 in the 42nd Parliament.
Unlike the UK's Intelligence and Security Committee, it's not a committee of parliament, but a committee of parliamentarians. In fact, it's a committee of the executive branch and accountable to the PM.
2/ Trouver un moyen de faire avancer le projet KXL. Préciser que le pétrole canadien est produit selon les normes environnementales les plus élevées au monde. Indiquer clairement notre point de vue: ce serait une perte sur le plan environnemental et pour notre reprise économique.
3/ Dans ce contexte, demander l’appui du Président pour explorer la possibilité d’une stratégie énergétique nord-américaine qui inclurait les énergies traditionnelles -pétrole, gaz- et les nouvelles formes d’énergie renouvelable, ainsi que les réseaux de transport d’électricité.
2/ Find a way for the KXL project to move forward. Make clear that Canadian oil is produced to the highest environmental standards in the world. Clearly indicate Canada's view that this cancellation is a loss for Canada's environmental plan and our economic recovery.
3/ In that context, ask for the President’s support to explore the possibility of an integrated North American energy strategy that would include traditional forms of energy, such as oil and gas, and newer forms of renewable energy, as well as electrical transmission grids.
1/ I strongly oppose any reinstatement of hate speech in the Canadian Human Rights Act. It would be too big a restriction on free speech in a free & democratic society.
I seconded & voted for Bill C-304, which removed hate speech from the Act.