US, NATO & Russia have not moved closer to a diplomatic solution. This Russian military buildup is unprecedented and even includes Belarus. A massive offensive is coming. How could this play out?
Read my full take w/ @DomCruzBus: foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukrai…
1/
There are many possible scenarios. Something short of an offensive might include recognition or annexation of the occupied Donbas. In a limited operation, Russia could seize more of the Donbas & major cities like Mariupol or Odessa, and establish a “land bridge” to Crimea. 2/
But these options would be unlikely to force diplomatic capitulation. They would entail costly urban warfare & long-term occupation of Ukr w/ insurgency. The Kremlin wouldn’t regain influence or control over Ukr domestic & foreign policy, and Ukr wouldn’t become a failed state.3/
A likely scenario is combined land, air, and sea power striking from all axes of attack. Long-range fire capabilities would target decision-making organs, critical infrastructure, and morale targets. Rus troops in Belarus would threaten Kyiv and hasten capitulation. 4/
Rather than occupation or establishing a puppet state, the goal would be punitive strikes to annihilate Ukr military capabilities & paralyze the government, then withdraw upon favorable settlement or sufficient punishment. Ukraine & West would have to pick up the pieces. 5/
What can the US do? Deliver on the unprecedented consequences that the Biden administration has promised. Rally bipartisan support for @SenatorMenendez Defending Ukrainian Sovereignty Act. Add new measures to target the wealth of Putin’s circle of kleptocrats. 6/
Continue expediting US-made arms transfers from allies. Join the UK, publicly airlift military equipment to Ukraine. Consider advanced capabilities which could still have initial operational capability. Provide real-time intelligence to Ukraine. Support a potential insurgency. 7/
Deploy additional EFPs along the eastern flank to reassure NATO allies. Engage w/ Sweden and Finland. Prepare to open humanitarian corridors to accommodate refugee flows from an expanded conflict. Plan on burden sharing to assist asylum seekers in US, UK, and EU. 8/
US must still be careful to avoid a bilateral military confrontation with Russia, but the Kremlin’s attempts to dismantle European security and roll back international treaties & agreements cannot go unpunished. 9/
Bottom line: There's still more to do to at least try to preempt another major theater war in Europe. Even if there are doubts about the offensive, given the seismic geopolitical shockwaves of war, prudence dictate more action to prevent, prepare, & respond to RUS aggression. 10/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now what? Diplomacy looks to be a dead-end & the U.S. & West have done little on deterrence. Russia's offensive against Ukraine will be the largest in Europe since World War II & there is nothing effective being done to avert it. Start working contingencies & arm Ukraine.
The USG should have started with an engagement (diplomacy) & pressure track. When paired, the pressure track would aid the possibility of dissuading the coming Russian offensive. Instead, the West went all-in on diplomacy, absent a display of hard power. It was destined to fail.
The pressure track, still has a small, possibly of being effective. The intent is to avoid the kind of war that is likely to drag the U.S. into a conflict (e.g. World War II). What to do: 1) Send troops to Eastern Europe to reassure allies and help with refugees coming from Ukr.
Supporting Ukraine is smart strategy. A prosperous Ukraine can compel change in Russia and upend the convergence of America’s two most dangerous adversaries. I explain the logic via this @NYTOpinionnytimes.com/2021/12/10/opi…
A prosperous Ukraine buttressed by American support makes an authoritarian Russia unviable in the long term.
Ukraine’s success would upend Russia’s irredentist aspirations for empire and highlight the Kremlin’s failures, just as West Germany’s achievements once did in comparison to the totalitarian East German state during the Cold War.
“As for what the country wants, it must surely include general officers who haven’t surrendered their moral autonomy to the political administration of the day”
“Generals that have thought deeply about what their obligation to the nation really entails…
Understanding it demands intellectual and moral rigor. I would guess that these are the qualities that America expects of its generals.”
“Resignation won’t atone for lives lost, or the debacle that American involvement in Afghanistan became, but it would at least demonstrate that these men understand the ethics of their profession. It would help calibrate the moral compass of thousands of officers beneath them.”
From Steve Katz, @steveLkatz
“In the just war tradition, describing a Sisyphean strategy and then attempting to execute it is an immoral act. However, even in this circumstance, senior officers are still empowered with moral agency and a choice:”
“they can either stay in command and accept some of the moral liability in waging an unjust war or they can request to be re-assigned, resign, or retire to avoid this moral stain. Over the course of the war, no generals pursued the latter option.”
If we want our institutions to be our guardrails rather than relying on a constant supply of individual saviors, we should hold our leaders accountable.
Read this article, then let me know what you think.
The JCS has more than a half-dozen 4-star military officers, each with several decades of service and dedication to defending the constitution against all enemies foreign & domestic. I am befuddled by the notion that only Milley was standing between a madman and Armageddon.
The safe option isn’t always the right one. Capitol Police Officers such as Harry Dunn have found themselves in the crosshairs of radical, vindictive fanatics because they gave a truthful account their experiences on Jan. 6. I know a bit about this experience.
By once more proving that Here, Right Matters, Officer Dunn has been subjected to an all too familiar smear campaign that privileges personal aggrandizement and gross negligence above the need for justice and accountability in our democracy.
I have tried my best to offer words of support to anyone facing this dilemma. Your close circle is far more important than any background noise, no matter how heinous. "Focus on the good; don't let the bad get you down, and you'll be fine."usatoday.com/story/news/pol…