New York Times concocts dishonest, incoherent sentence to avoid recognizing the simple fact of anti-Israel bias at the U.N.
1. The U.N. last year adopted more resolutions targeting Israel than on Iran, Syria & North Korea combined. Bias here isn't a "perception" but a fact. /...
1. The U.N. last year adopted more resolutions targeting Israel than on Iran, Syria & North Korea combined. Bias here isn't a "perception" but a fact. /...
2. Dishonest because even if they refuse to report bias as a fact, and will only tell us what "Israelis perceive," then get it right: Israelis perceive that the U.N. is biased against Israel and Jews, in favor of terrorists and dictators; not "for Palestinian aspirations." /...
3. Incoherent sentence because if the first part reports as a fact that diplomatic victories for Israel are unusual, then it makes no sense to elaborate on and support this fact in the second part with a mere "Israeli perception." /...
4. @nytimes, here are some facts:
• UNGA adopted 14 resolutions on Israel last year, and 5 on rest of the world combined
• UNHRC has one agenda item on the world (Item 4) and one on Israel alone (Item 7)
• UNESCO condemns only 1 country: Israel
Source: unwatch.org/database
• UNGA adopted 14 resolutions on Israel last year, and 5 on rest of the world combined
• UNHRC has one agenda item on the world (Item 4) and one on Israel alone (Item 7)
• UNESCO condemns only 1 country: Israel
Source: unwatch.org/database
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
