1. (thread) Ambassador, that I should get you quoting Nehru is an achievement!😀My tweets were on the role & legacy of our forces during the Great Wars, quite separate from the views of any political leaders at the time. (more)
2. But seeing that we are now cherry-picking quotes of political leaders, do share your thoughts on Savarkar who, in Dec 1940, encouraged Hindu men to join various branches of the British Armed forces en masse. Do you believe Savarkar endorsed `mercenary' Indian soldiers?
3. Does PM Modi consider these men to be 'mercenaries' when he travels to war memorials around the world to honour them? Was it wrong for our national anthem to be played out when the PM visited Neuve Chapelle in France?
4. Was it wrong for Mr. Modi to have said, ''India remembers our brave soldiers who fought in WW-1. This was a war in which India was not directly involved yet our soldiers fought world over, just for the cause of peace.''
5. Did he trivialise the role of these men by calling them `mercenaries?' No.
6. Did VP Naidu on a visit to a war memorial in France not say, ''The sons and daughters of India have always stood on the side of righteousness even when confronting the toughest adversities ... '' (more)
7. '' ... and have fought gallantly and laid down their lives to uphold and promote these cherished ideals, in the far-flung corners of the world.'' Did he diminish their role by calling them `mercenaries?'
8. Since the word `mercenary' appears to strike such a chord, should we refer to the 39 Gorkha battalions serving in seven Gorkha regiments in the Indian Army as `mercenaries?'
9. They are a part of a shared colonial legacy, are citizens of Nepal and yet an integral part of core of the Indian Army ...
10. Should we refer to the Special Frontier Force, composed of Tibetan Refugees a `mercenary' force since they fight for our Army, are paid by our government but still owe allegiance to the Dalai Lama? The same men who recently gave the Chinese hell on the Kailash Ranges?
11. Overlooking our martial heritage, conflating a colonial past to a few words - `mercenary,' `colonial apologist' or `cannon fodder' are part of an attempt to re-write a key part of our history. The facts remain despite this effort.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/3. Per France24, the Indian Army, as guests of honour at Bastille Day in Paris, 2009, ''were in uniforms inspired by those of the former British Empire.'' (more)
2/3 Meanwhile, Vice President Naidu visited a war memorial in France in 2018 honouring Indian soldiers and said, ''The war memorial is a testimony to the valour and sacrifice of Indian soldiers.'' Clearly no effort at whitewashing the role of Indians in World War-1 (more).
3/3 - And yet, this belated effort now on twitter at attempting to play down our military's colonial heritage. As Ambassador to France, did you not visit the memorial at Neuve-Chappel?
1. India's fight against fascism in WW-2 was a battle against a genocidal force that represented the greatest evil known to humanity. The cause was an international one in which 87,000+ Indians were killed in an effort endorsed by our freedom fighters.
2. India fielded the largest volunteer force in history - men who returned 4000 war decorations and 18 Victoria Crosses for gallantry. To simply refer to these men as cannon fodder without looking at their spectacular military successes is unfair.
3. Feeling nostalgic about military traditions that have defined the Indian Army for generations is NOT synonymous with justifying colonialism. History is not always black and white. One needs to accept its strands. Doing so doesn't make us weaker.
1.Ignorant to pass off India Gate & the names inscribed as merely `a symbol of our colonial past.' More than 74,000 Indians were killed in WW-1, one of the largest volunteer forces in history. The legacy of the Indian Army, one of the greatest anywhere, stems from its past.
2. The bedrock of the Indian Army are its traditions. Its regiments have a strong colonial past - they are seeped in tradition. To ignore that past, & to simplify this proud legacy to Indians in WW-1 having fought `someone else's war' is crude revisionism.
3. Generations of Indians - officers and men - have followed in the footsteps of their forefathers - men who fought in the Great Wars. They were inspired by the stories of these men and their valour.
1/4 [Thread with images] Putting images of the new Chinese bridge across the Pangong through some filters/adjustments. First, the original images. 📸: @Maxar
1. SOURCES: Chopper crash of Gen Bipin Rawat was the result of Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) in cloudy weather conditions. (CFIT is defined in aviation as being caused by pilot error.) IATA definition in next tweet:
2. IATA (International Air Transport Association) - CFIT refers to accidents in which there was an in-flight collision with terrain, water, or obstacle, without indication of loss of control. (MORE)
3. IATA: The critical distinction in these types of accidents is the fact that the aircraft is under the control of the flight crew.