How are China's wolf warrior diplomats and state media covering the Ukraine crisis on Twitter?
✅Boosting Kremlin talking points casting the UK's recent warning as "disinformation"
✅Highlighting schisms in Europe, NATO
✅Dunking on US
Examples, just from today 👇
China's state media and diplomats are boosting Putin's attempts to discredit the British Government's warning that Russia plans to install a pro-Kremlin leader in Ukraine.
Beijing's wolf warriors are hammering the idea that the current crisis is "blowing holes" in the European project and NATO alliance and suggesting that the US is not an effective, respected leader.
Here are more examples, again just in the last 24 hours, highlighting differences among NATO allies on how to approach the crisis.
This is in line with the "divide and discredit" strategy the Kremlin has been running for weeks, which I recently described for @BrookingsFP 👇
And then, of course, Beijing is using the crisis to troll the United States, framing the State Department as ineffective and American people as bumbling.
We saw a similar approach in Beijing's coverage of the other crisis in the region: Kazakhstan.
As I've argued for @TWQgw, I don't believe China and Russia are formally coordinating, but they share certain near-term goals (denting the global prestige of the US; weakening the EU, NATO, transatlantic alliance) and therefore promote similar narratives.
For @BrookingsInst's #TechSTream, @vwirtschafter and I document the spread of the Kremlin's preferred narrative of the NordStream sabotage (the US did it) spread across popular political podcasts in the US
Russian state-controlled media's response to the #PandoraPapers attempts to discredit allegations against individuals linked to the Kremlin and suggests Washington had a hand in the leak.
Russian state media have been amplifying some of the project’s most troubling findings — including the US' emergence as a leading destination for sheltering dark money — while simultaneously trafficking in conspiracies about the origin of the leaks.
State-controlled media have repeatedly boosted skepticism over the absence of US officials in the docs, suggesting Western leaders might've been “screened out” from the data and that “recurring peculiarities” point to “Washington’s hand behind” the disclosures.
Unclear whether its centrally orchestrated or organic, but there are several examples of Chinese officials retweeting suspicious accounts, as Bret Schafer notes here: foreignpolicy.com/2021/07/09/chi…
.@SecureDemocracy looked at more than 35K vaccine-related messages from Russian, Chinese, and Iranian diplomats, government officials, and state media outlets on Twitter, YouTube, and state-sponsored news websites get a handle on their narratives.
What did we find? THREAD
FIRST: While there were few instances of any studied country promoting verifiably false info about vaccines, reports of safety concerns related to certain Western vaccines were often sensationalized while key contextual info was omitted or downplayed.
For EX: Iran’s Fars News Agency tweeted that the Pfizer vaccine “kill[ed] six people in America,” omitting (and never correcting) that:
- 4 of the 6 ppl who died had received a placebo
- authorities determined no causal connection b/w vaccines and the deaths of the other 2