The person of color victimized by this terrible crime is suing SF's DA directly. That's a new twist.
Just a little while ago woke whites wanted to end qualified immunity for police. Perhaps this case will end absolute immunity for prosecutors themselves. nlg-npap.org/absolute-immun…
The discourse has, so far, entertained the idea of police being sued for over-enforcement. We are now seeing prosecutors being sued for *under*-enforcement.
Setting emotions aside, these are (in a sense) type I and type II errors respectively, and both should be disincentivized.
The question is what mechanism should disincentivize these errors. Are lawsuits really surgical enough?
My guess is that we'll see more of these. And it may end up destabilizing the system from both directions.
Russian troops have been massing near the Ukrainian border for weeks. Negotiations not looking good. US carriers also apparently now positioned to deter China if something happens in Ukraine.
No idea what's going to happen or which reports are accurate. Monitoring with caution.
Some thoughts:
1) Fog of war applies. Who knows what reports are real? Military deception is a thing.
2) This is one of those things (possible simultaneous conflicts with Russia and China?) that you'd think would get more attention. Not that attention necessarily helps...
Also, if you're truly taking Gell-Mann amnesia into account, every article has to be put through the filter that media corporations are unreliable narrators.
But *if* they didn't butcher this quote, then Russia is saying negotiations are at a "dead end". bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
In both cases, the visceral and visible improvements are the direct consequence of powerful new ideas.
The philosophy around digital cash predated the gains by decades. As does that of transhumanism. They came together in the person of Hal Finney, who was an extropian.
"He’s always been optimistic about the future," says Hal Finney's wife, Fran. "Every new advance, he embraced it, every new technology. Hal relished life, and he made the most of everything." archive.is/gNLv5
It’s actually pretty important to have an agreed-upon quantitative framework for teasing out the relative contributions of luck vs skill vs hard work vs initial conditions.
Gets to core questions about what is inherited privilege vs actual accomplishment.
We recognize that athletes, mathematicians, models, and singers all have intrinsic talents.
Anyone can pick up a ball, pencil, mirror, or microphone and quickly see if they have comparable gifts.
This makes people accept nonuniform outcomes. No entitlement to a Super Bowl Ring.
For anything involving others, though — especially management or finance — many believe no skill is involved. It’s all lucky, lazy fat cats.
I don’t believe we can convince them they are wrong.
I believe we need to make them CEOs & investors too. Make it easy to try their luck.