مَن
Is used to refer to a being, we know this is only one being since the word is only used for that which has life, also later on comes يخسف again one being.
This is a relative noun, mentioned in 3 locations: من - يخسف - وإليه
But are they all one?!
فِي
This is called or referred to as a letter. It is used in many different ways:
-physical location or time في المدرسة
-figurative location or time في قناعة
-reason في هرة
-filling a hidden word في خير الله
-comparison متاع الدنيا في الآخرة
-replacing ب - إلى - مع - على
السماء
Samaa originally doesn’t mean sky, it simply means above you; physically & figuratively.
سماء بيتك سقفك
Essentially, anything not on land (or earth) is called Samaa.
This is why it is defined as what opposes the ground (earth)!
What most do not know is Sama is plural.
Now let’s bring everything together;
مَن فِي السماء
Literally: Who is in the Sky.
Actually: Who’s in His Highness. Meaning God.
Because as I mentioned: Sama does not mean sky only.
But if you take it as Sky, you are left with “Fi” as an issue!
To change “fi” you need external evidence! But there isn’t any!
Actually, to say it is “ala” you run into another problem which is which ala!
Let’s see what ala stand for!
على
A letter; used for:
-aboveness literally & figuratively. على الفلك أو على النار هدى
-with
-next to
-reason
-in
-agreement
-replacing ب
-addons
-extra
Now you run into more problems!
Did they just say ala to mean physical location?
On the contrary;
They said على not by space, distance, direction or proximity!
This Ala automatically negates the literal and physical approach altogether!
Which must mean those who used على meant it figuratively as in أحد على النار هدى
Or even metaphorically as ولهم علي ذنب

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with موقع المنهاجي الشافعي

موقع المنهاجي الشافعي Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Alminhaji

Jan 26
Bayhaqis creed:

وَفِي الْجُمْلَةِ يَجِبُ أَنْ يُعْلَمَ أَنَّ اسْتِوَاءَ اللَّهِ سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى لَيْسَ بِاسْتِوَاءِ اعْتِدَالٍ عَنِ اعْوِجَاجٍ وَلَا اسْتِقْرَارٍ فِي مَكَانٍ
In short one must know that Allahs Istiwa isn’t due to his imbalance, nor is he settling somewhere
وَلَا مُمَّاسَّةٍ لِشَيْءٍ مِنْ خَلْقِهِ، لَكِنَّهُ مُسْتَوٍ عَلَى عَرْشِهِ كَمَا أَخْبَرَ بِلَا كَيْفٍ بِلَا أَيْنَ
Read 23 tweets
Jan 26
قال أبو الهلال في الفروق: يخصص العلو في حقه - سبحانه - بعلوه على الخلق بالقدرة عليهم.
قال ابن فارس: وَأَمَّا الْعُلُوُّ فَالْعَظَمَةُ وَالتَّجَبُّرُ. يَقُولُونَ: عَلَا الْمَلِكُ فِي الْأَرْضِ عُلُوًّا.
وقال: وقال: وَيُقَالُ لِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ يَعْلُو: عَلَا يَعْلُو. فَإِنْ كَانَ فِي الرِّفْعَةِ وَالشَّرَفِ قِيلَ عَلِيَ يَعْلَى. وَمَنْ قَهَرَ أَمْرًا فَقَدِ اعْتَلَاهُ وَاسْتَعْلَى عَلَيْهِ وَبِهِ.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 25
قال التستري: قوله: بَلْ يَداهُ مَبْسُوطَتانِ يُنْفِقُ كَيْفَ يَشاءُ وقال: يعني حكمه وأمره ونهيه نافذ في ملكه.
قال الأخفش: {وقالت اليهود يد الله مغلولة غلّت أيديهم . فذكروا أنّها «العطيّة» و «النّعمة». وكذلك} {بل يداه مبسوطتان كما تقول: «إنّ لفلان عندي يدا» أي: نعمة. وقال} {أولي الأيدي والأبصار أي: أولي النّعم. وقد تكون «اليد» في وجوه، تقول: «بين يدي الدار» تعني: قدامها، وليست للدار يدان.
قال الطبري: يقول تعالى ذكره:"وقالت اليهود"، من بني إسرائيل="يد الله مغلولة"، يعنون: أن خير الله مُمْسَك وعطاؤه محبوس عن الاتساع عليهم
Read 6 tweets
Jan 25
Explaining The claim that Shahrastani claimed that Ashari broke Ijmaa!!!!
In order to understand what was he saying we have to start from the top!
He says:
ولقد كان الأمر في أول الزمان على قولين أحدهما: القدم والثاني:
الحدوث
Read 27 tweets
Jan 25
قال الشهرستاني: وأشدهم تقصيرا الكرامية الذين ينفر الطبع السليم
قال الشهرستاني: إما أن يحدث في ذاته كما صارت إليه الكرامية فيكون محلا للحوادث وذلك باطل.
قلت: وهذا قول الوهابية؛ أن كلامه محدث الآحاد!
the worst of the opinions is that of the Karramyyah, as people with clean mindsets and innocents dislike the Karramyyah
Read 4 tweets
Jan 25
1. Ibn ‘Yyash is weak! His statements aren’t revelation.
2. He didn’t say “Above” you added that!
3. By you saying “above” you have changed what he means!
4. We do say “fi assama” you don’t.
5. You lied at the end and said there are types of Jahmyyah, they all said everywhere
1. Hammads words are not revelation.
2. He didn’t say “above”.
3. To claim every “fi” means “above” show excessive lack of integrity!
4. We say “fi assama”
1. Abbads words are not revelation.
2. Thank you so much for this quote because it negates your whole premise and claim that is coming up! Where you lied and said some of the Jahmyyah don’t say he is everywhere!
This negates that very claim since Bishr was vocal on this one!
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(